diff mbox series

[bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Use __failure macro in task kfunc testsuite

Message ID 20230120021844.3048244-1-void@manifault.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 7525daeefc8c20902bac63f89603096c76808fe0
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Use __failure macro in task kfunc testsuite | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 4 maintainers not CCed: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org shuah@kernel.org yhs@fb.com mykolal@fb.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 213 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

David Vernet Jan. 20, 2023, 2:18 a.m. UTC 
In commit 537c3f66eac1 ("selftests/bpf: add generic BPF program
tester-loader"), a new mechanism was added to the BPF selftest framework
to allow testsuites to use macros to define expected failing testcases.
This allows any testsuite which tests verification failure to remove a
good amount of boilerplate code. This patch updates the task_kfunc
selftest suite to use these new macros.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c     | 71 +------------------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c  | 18 +++++
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

Comments

Yonghong Song Jan. 20, 2023, 7:06 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 1/19/23 6:18 PM, David Vernet wrote:
> In commit 537c3f66eac1 ("selftests/bpf: add generic BPF program
> tester-loader"), a new mechanism was added to the BPF selftest framework
> to allow testsuites to use macros to define expected failing testcases.
> This allows any testsuite which tests verification failure to remove a
> good amount of boilerplate code. This patch updates the task_kfunc
> selftest suite to use these new macros.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Jan. 23, 2023, 7:40 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:18:44 -0600 you wrote:
> In commit 537c3f66eac1 ("selftests/bpf: add generic BPF program
> tester-loader"), a new mechanism was added to the BPF selftest framework
> to allow testsuites to use macros to define expected failing testcases.
> This allows any testsuite which tests verification failure to remove a
> good amount of boilerplate code. This patch updates the task_kfunc
> selftest suite to use these new macros.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Use __failure macro in task kfunc testsuite
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7525daeefc8c

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c
index 18848c31e36f..f79fa5bc9a8d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c
@@ -9,9 +9,6 @@ 
 #include "task_kfunc_failure.skel.h"
 #include "task_kfunc_success.skel.h"
 
-static size_t log_buf_sz = 1 << 20; /* 1 MB */
-static char obj_log_buf[1048576];
-
 static struct task_kfunc_success *open_load_task_kfunc_skel(void)
 {
 	struct task_kfunc_success *skel;
@@ -83,67 +80,6 @@  static const char * const success_tests[] = {
 	"test_task_from_pid_invalid",
 };
 
-static struct {
-	const char *prog_name;
-	const char *expected_err_msg;
-} failure_tests[] = {
-	{"task_kfunc_acquire_untrusted", "R1 must be referenced or trusted"},
-	{"task_kfunc_acquire_fp", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"},
-	{"task_kfunc_acquire_unsafe_kretprobe", "reg type unsupported for arg#0 function"},
-	{"task_kfunc_acquire_trusted_walked", "R1 must be referenced or trusted"},
-	{"task_kfunc_acquire_null", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"},
-	{"task_kfunc_acquire_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"},
-	{"task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_param", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"},
-	{"task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_acquired", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"},
-	{"task_kfunc_get_null", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"},
-	{"task_kfunc_xchg_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"},
-	{"task_kfunc_get_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"},
-	{"task_kfunc_release_untrusted", "arg#0 is untrusted_ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket"},
-	{"task_kfunc_release_fp", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"},
-	{"task_kfunc_release_null", "arg#0 is ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket"},
-	{"task_kfunc_release_unacquired", "release kernel function bpf_task_release expects"},
-	{"task_kfunc_from_pid_no_null_check", "arg#0 is ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket"},
-	{"task_kfunc_from_lsm_task_free", "reg type unsupported for arg#0 function"},
-};
-
-static void verify_fail(const char *prog_name, const char *expected_err_msg)
-{
-	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
-	struct task_kfunc_failure *skel;
-	int err, i;
-
-	opts.kernel_log_buf = obj_log_buf;
-	opts.kernel_log_size = log_buf_sz;
-	opts.kernel_log_level = 1;
-
-	skel = task_kfunc_failure__open_opts(&opts);
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "task_kfunc_failure__open_opts"))
-		goto cleanup;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(failure_tests); i++) {
-		struct bpf_program *prog;
-		const char *curr_name = failure_tests[i].prog_name;
-
-		prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, curr_name);
-		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name"))
-			goto cleanup;
-
-		bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, !strcmp(curr_name, prog_name));
-	}
-
-	err = task_kfunc_failure__load(skel);
-	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "unexpected load success"))
-		goto cleanup;
-
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(obj_log_buf, expected_err_msg), "expected_err_msg")) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "Expected err_msg: %s\n", expected_err_msg);
-		fprintf(stderr, "Verifier output: %s\n", obj_log_buf);
-	}
-
-cleanup:
-	task_kfunc_failure__destroy(skel);
-}
-
 void test_task_kfunc(void)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -155,10 +91,5 @@  void test_task_kfunc(void)
 		run_success_test(success_tests[i]);
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(failure_tests); i++) {
-		if (!test__start_subtest(failure_tests[i].prog_name))
-			continue;
-
-		verify_fail(failure_tests[i].prog_name, failure_tests[i].expected_err_msg);
-	}
+	RUN_TESTS(task_kfunc_failure);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
index 1b47b94dbca0..e6950d6a9cf0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ 
 #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
 #include "task_kfunc_common.h"
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
@@ -27,6 +28,7 @@  static struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value *insert_lookup_task(struct task_struct *ta
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("R1 must be referenced or trusted")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_untrusted, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *acquired;
@@ -44,6 +46,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_untrusted, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_f
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_fp, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *acquired, *stack_task = (struct task_struct *)&clone_flags;
@@ -56,6 +59,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_fp, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("kretprobe/free_task")
+__failure __msg("reg type unsupported for arg#0 function")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_unsafe_kretprobe, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *acquired;
@@ -68,6 +72,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_unsafe_kretprobe, struct task_struct *task, u64
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("R1 must be referenced or trusted")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_trusted_walked, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *acquired;
@@ -81,6 +86,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_trusted_walked, struct task_struct *task, u64 cl
 
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *acquired;
@@ -95,6 +101,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("Unreleased reference")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *acquired;
@@ -107,6 +114,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("arg#0 expected pointer to map value")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_param, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *kptr;
@@ -122,6 +130,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_param, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("arg#0 expected pointer to map value")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_acquired, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *kptr, *acquired;
@@ -140,6 +149,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_acquired, struct task_struct *task, u64 clo
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("arg#0 expected pointer to map value")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *kptr;
@@ -155,6 +165,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("Unreleased reference")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_xchg_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *kptr;
@@ -174,6 +185,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_xchg_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_fla
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("Unreleased reference")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *kptr;
@@ -193,6 +205,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flag
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("arg#0 is untrusted_ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_untrusted, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value *v;
@@ -208,6 +221,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_untrusted, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_f
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_fp, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *acquired = (struct task_struct *)&clone_flags;
@@ -219,6 +233,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_fp, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("arg#0 is ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value local, *v;
@@ -251,6 +266,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("release kernel function bpf_task_release expects")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_unacquired, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	/* Cannot release trusted task pointer which was not acquired. */
@@ -260,6 +276,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_unacquired, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_
 }
 
 SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("arg#0 is ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_from_pid_no_null_check, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *acquired;
@@ -273,6 +290,7 @@  int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_from_pid_no_null_check, struct task_struct *task, u64 cl
 }
 
 SEC("lsm/task_free")
+__failure __msg("reg type unsupported for arg#0 function")
 int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_from_lsm_task_free, struct task_struct *task)
 {
 	struct task_struct *acquired;