diff mbox series

[RESEND] igbvf: Fix rx_buffer_len

Message ID 20230124043915.12952-1-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com (mailing list archive)
State Awaiting Upstream
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [RESEND] igbvf: Fix rx_buffer_len | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix warning Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 1 blamed authors not CCed: alexander.h.duyck@intel.com; 1 maintainers not CCed: alexander.h.duyck@intel.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Akihiko Odaki Jan. 24, 2023, 4:39 a.m. UTC
When rx_buffer_len is not aligned by 1024, igbvf sets the aligned size
to SRRCTL while the buffer is allocated with the unaligned size. This
allows the device to write more data than rx_buffer_len, resulting in
memory corruption. Align rx_buffer_len itself so that the buffer will
be allocated with the aligned size.

The condition to split RX packet header, which uses rx_buffer_len, is
also modified so that it doesn't change the behavior for the same
actual (unaligned) packet size. Actually the new condition is not
identical with the old one as it will no longer request splitting when
the actual packet size is exactly 2048, but that should be negligible.

Fixes: d4e0fe01a38a ("igbvf: add new driver to support 82576 virtual functions")
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Paul Menzel Jan. 24, 2023, 10:49 a.m. UTC | #1
Dear Akihiko,


Thank you for your patch.

Am 24.01.23 um 05:39 schrieb Akihiko Odaki:

Maybe improve the commit message summary to be more specific:

igbvf: Align rx_buffer_len to fix memory corrption

> When rx_buffer_len is not aligned by 1024, igbvf sets the aligned size
> to SRRCTL while the buffer is allocated with the unaligned size. This
> allows the device to write more data than rx_buffer_len, resulting in
> memory corruption. Align rx_buffer_len itself so that the buffer will
> be allocated with the aligned size.
> 
> The condition to split RX packet header, which uses rx_buffer_len, is
> also modified so that it doesn't change the behavior for the same
> actual (unaligned) packet size. Actually the new condition is not
> identical with the old one as it will no longer request splitting when
> the actual packet size is exactly 2048, but that should be negligible.

Is there an easy way to reproduce it?


Kind regards,

Paul


> Fixes: d4e0fe01a38a ("igbvf: add new driver to support 82576 virtual functions")
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c | 9 +++++----
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
> index 3a32809510fc..b6bca78198fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
> @@ -1341,10 +1341,9 @@ static void igbvf_setup_srrctl(struct igbvf_adapter *adapter)
>   	srrctl |= E1000_SRRCTL_DROP_EN;
>   
>   	/* Setup buffer sizes */
> -	srrctl |= ALIGN(adapter->rx_buffer_len, 1024) >>
> -		  E1000_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_SHIFT;
> +	srrctl |= adapter->rx_buffer_len >> E1000_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_SHIFT;
>   
> -	if (adapter->rx_buffer_len < 2048) {
> +	if (adapter->rx_buffer_len <= 2048) {
>   		adapter->rx_ps_hdr_size = 0;
>   		srrctl |= E1000_SRRCTL_DESCTYPE_ADV_ONEBUF;
>   	} else {
> @@ -1625,7 +1624,7 @@ static int igbvf_sw_init(struct igbvf_adapter *adapter)
>   	struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev;
>   	s32 rc;
>   
> -	adapter->rx_buffer_len = ETH_FRAME_LEN + VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
> +	adapter->rx_buffer_len = ALIGN(ETH_FRAME_LEN + VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN, 1024);
>   	adapter->rx_ps_hdr_size = 0;
>   	adapter->max_frame_size = netdev->mtu + ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
>   	adapter->min_frame_size = ETH_ZLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
> @@ -2429,6 +2428,8 @@ static int igbvf_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
>   		adapter->rx_buffer_len = ETH_FRAME_LEN + VLAN_HLEN +
>   					 ETH_FCS_LEN;
>   
> +	adapter->rx_buffer_len = ALIGN(adapter->rx_buffer_len, 1024);
> +
>   	netdev_dbg(netdev, "changing MTU from %d to %d\n",
>   		   netdev->mtu, new_mtu);
>   	netdev->mtu = new_mtu;
Akihiko Odaki Jan. 25, 2023, 4:04 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2023/01/24 19:49, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Akihiko,
> 
> 
> Thank you for your patch.
> 
> Am 24.01.23 um 05:39 schrieb Akihiko Odaki:
> 
> Maybe improve the commit message summary to be more specific:
> 
> igbvf: Align rx_buffer_len to fix memory corrption
> 
>> When rx_buffer_len is not aligned by 1024, igbvf sets the aligned size
>> to SRRCTL while the buffer is allocated with the unaligned size. This
>> allows the device to write more data than rx_buffer_len, resulting in
>> memory corruption. Align rx_buffer_len itself so that the buffer will
>> be allocated with the aligned size.
>>
>> The condition to split RX packet header, which uses rx_buffer_len, is
>> also modified so that it doesn't change the behavior for the same
>> actual (unaligned) packet size. Actually the new condition is not
>> identical with the old one as it will no longer request splitting when
>> the actual packet size is exactly 2048, but that should be negligible.
> 
> Is there an easy way to reproduce it?
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul
> 
> 

I withdraw this patch. While igbvf sets a value greater than the actual 
buffer size to SRRCTL.BSIZEPKT, such a long packet should be dropped 
according to VMOLR.RLPML.

Regards,
Akihiko Odaki

>> Fixes: d4e0fe01a38a ("igbvf: add new driver to support 82576 virtual 
>> functions")
>> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c | 9 +++++----
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c 
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
>> index 3a32809510fc..b6bca78198fa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
>> @@ -1341,10 +1341,9 @@ static void igbvf_setup_srrctl(struct 
>> igbvf_adapter *adapter)
>>       srrctl |= E1000_SRRCTL_DROP_EN;
>>       /* Setup buffer sizes */
>> -    srrctl |= ALIGN(adapter->rx_buffer_len, 1024) >>
>> -          E1000_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_SHIFT;
>> +    srrctl |= adapter->rx_buffer_len >> E1000_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_SHIFT;
>> -    if (adapter->rx_buffer_len < 2048) {
>> +    if (adapter->rx_buffer_len <= 2048) {
>>           adapter->rx_ps_hdr_size = 0;
>>           srrctl |= E1000_SRRCTL_DESCTYPE_ADV_ONEBUF;
>>       } else {
>> @@ -1625,7 +1624,7 @@ static int igbvf_sw_init(struct igbvf_adapter 
>> *adapter)
>>       struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev;
>>       s32 rc;
>> -    adapter->rx_buffer_len = ETH_FRAME_LEN + VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
>> +    adapter->rx_buffer_len = ALIGN(ETH_FRAME_LEN + VLAN_HLEN + 
>> ETH_FCS_LEN, 1024);
>>       adapter->rx_ps_hdr_size = 0;
>>       adapter->max_frame_size = netdev->mtu + ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
>>       adapter->min_frame_size = ETH_ZLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
>> @@ -2429,6 +2428,8 @@ static int igbvf_change_mtu(struct net_device 
>> *netdev, int new_mtu)
>>           adapter->rx_buffer_len = ETH_FRAME_LEN + VLAN_HLEN +
>>                        ETH_FCS_LEN;
>> +    adapter->rx_buffer_len = ALIGN(adapter->rx_buffer_len, 1024);
>> +
>>       netdev_dbg(netdev, "changing MTU from %d to %d\n",
>>              netdev->mtu, new_mtu);
>>       netdev->mtu = new_mtu;
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
index 3a32809510fc..b6bca78198fa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
@@ -1341,10 +1341,9 @@  static void igbvf_setup_srrctl(struct igbvf_adapter *adapter)
 	srrctl |= E1000_SRRCTL_DROP_EN;
 
 	/* Setup buffer sizes */
-	srrctl |= ALIGN(adapter->rx_buffer_len, 1024) >>
-		  E1000_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_SHIFT;
+	srrctl |= adapter->rx_buffer_len >> E1000_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_SHIFT;
 
-	if (adapter->rx_buffer_len < 2048) {
+	if (adapter->rx_buffer_len <= 2048) {
 		adapter->rx_ps_hdr_size = 0;
 		srrctl |= E1000_SRRCTL_DESCTYPE_ADV_ONEBUF;
 	} else {
@@ -1625,7 +1624,7 @@  static int igbvf_sw_init(struct igbvf_adapter *adapter)
 	struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev;
 	s32 rc;
 
-	adapter->rx_buffer_len = ETH_FRAME_LEN + VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
+	adapter->rx_buffer_len = ALIGN(ETH_FRAME_LEN + VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN, 1024);
 	adapter->rx_ps_hdr_size = 0;
 	adapter->max_frame_size = netdev->mtu + ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
 	adapter->min_frame_size = ETH_ZLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
@@ -2429,6 +2428,8 @@  static int igbvf_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
 		adapter->rx_buffer_len = ETH_FRAME_LEN + VLAN_HLEN +
 					 ETH_FCS_LEN;
 
+	adapter->rx_buffer_len = ALIGN(adapter->rx_buffer_len, 1024);
+
 	netdev_dbg(netdev, "changing MTU from %d to %d\n",
 		   netdev->mtu, new_mtu);
 	netdev->mtu = new_mtu;