| Message ID | 20230122170724.21868-5-shentey@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ACPI controller cleanup | expand |
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 18:07:21 +0100 Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> wrote: > Cosmetic change emphasizing ... how 3/7 makes it more confusing > that always the actual address of the gpe0 > block is returned. > > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> > --- > hw/acpi/ich9.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/ich9.c b/hw/acpi/ich9.c > index f8af238974..40a20e01ea 100644 > --- a/hw/acpi/ich9.c > +++ b/hw/acpi/ich9.c > @@ -348,7 +348,9 @@ static void ich9_pm_get_gpe0_blk(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, > void *opaque, Error **errp) > { > ICH9LPCPMRegs *pm = opaque; > - uint64_t value = pm->io.addr + ICH9_PMIO_GPE0_STS; > + uint64_t value = pm->io.addr + pm->io_gpe.addr; do not poke inside of MemoryRegion, right API to use here if you really want to get it from memory region would be memory_region_find && MemoryRegionSection::offset_within_address_space magic I'd just drop 3/7 and this patch > + > + assert(&pm->io == pm->io_gpe.container); > > visit_type_uint64(v, name, &value, errp); > }
diff --git a/hw/acpi/ich9.c b/hw/acpi/ich9.c index f8af238974..40a20e01ea 100644 --- a/hw/acpi/ich9.c +++ b/hw/acpi/ich9.c @@ -348,7 +348,9 @@ static void ich9_pm_get_gpe0_blk(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, void *opaque, Error **errp) { ICH9LPCPMRegs *pm = opaque; - uint64_t value = pm->io.addr + ICH9_PMIO_GPE0_STS; + uint64_t value = pm->io.addr + pm->io_gpe.addr; + + assert(&pm->io == pm->io_gpe.container); visit_type_uint64(v, name, &value, errp); }
Cosmetic change emphasizing that always the actual address of the gpe0 block is returned. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> --- hw/acpi/ich9.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)