Message ID | 20230120224627.4053418-24-quic_eberman@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Drivers for gunyah hypervisor | expand |
* Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com> [2023-01-20 14:46:22]: > +static inline bool gh_vm_io_handler_matches(struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr, u64 addr, > + u64 len, u64 data) > +{ > + u64 mask = BIT_ULL(io_hdlr->len * BITS_PER_BYTE) - 1; > + > + if (io_hdlr->addr != addr) Isn't this test redundant (given that caller would have performed same test)? > + return false; > + > + if (!io_hdlr->datamatch) > + return true; > + > + if (io_hdlr->len != len) > + return false; > + > + return (data & mask) == (io_hdlr->data & mask); > +} > + > +static struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *gh_vm_mgr_find_io_hdlr(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, u64 addr, > + u64 len, u64 data) > +{ > + struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr = NULL; > + struct rb_node *root = NULL; > + > + root = ghvm->mmio_handler_root.rb_node; > + while (root) { > + io_hdlr = rb_entry(root, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler, node); > + if (addr < io_hdlr->addr) > + root = root->rb_left; > + else if (addr > io_hdlr->addr) > + root = root->rb_right; > + else if (gh_vm_io_handler_matches(io_hdlr, addr, len, data)) In case of handler not matching, don't we need to modify root? Otherwise we can be stuck in infinite loop here AFAICS. > + return io_hdlr; > + } > + return NULL; > +} // snip > +int gh_vm_mgr_add_io_handler(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr) > +{ > + struct rb_node **root, *parent = NULL; > + > + if (io_hdlr->datamatch && > + (!io_hdlr->len || io_hdlr->len > (sizeof(io_hdlr->data) * BITS_PER_BYTE))) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + root = &ghvm->mmio_handler_root.rb_node; > + while (*root) { > + struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *curr = rb_entry(*root, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler, > + node); > + > + parent = *root; > + if (io_hdlr->addr < curr->addr) > + root = &((*root)->rb_left); > + else if (io_hdlr->addr > curr->addr) > + root = &((*root)->rb_right); > + else We should allow two io_handlers on the same addr, but with different data matches I think. > + return -EEXIST; > + } > + > + rb_link_node(&io_hdlr->node, parent, root); > + rb_insert_color(&io_hdlr->node, &ghvm->mmio_handler_root); > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_vm_mgr_add_io_handler);
On 2/6/2023 2:46 AM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > * Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com> [2023-01-20 14:46:22]: > >> +static inline bool gh_vm_io_handler_matches(struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr, u64 addr, >> + u64 len, u64 data) >> +{ >> + u64 mask = BIT_ULL(io_hdlr->len * BITS_PER_BYTE) - 1; >> + >> + if (io_hdlr->addr != addr) > > Isn't this test redundant (given that caller would have performed same test)? > Done. >> + return false; >> + >> + if (!io_hdlr->datamatch) >> + return true; >> + >> + if (io_hdlr->len != len) >> + return false; >> + >> + return (data & mask) == (io_hdlr->data & mask); >> +} >> + >> +static struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *gh_vm_mgr_find_io_hdlr(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, u64 addr, >> + u64 len, u64 data) >> +{ >> + struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr = NULL; >> + struct rb_node *root = NULL; >> + >> + root = ghvm->mmio_handler_root.rb_node; >> + while (root) { >> + io_hdlr = rb_entry(root, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler, node); >> + if (addr < io_hdlr->addr) >> + root = root->rb_left; >> + else if (addr > io_hdlr->addr) >> + root = root->rb_right; >> + else if (gh_vm_io_handler_matches(io_hdlr, addr, len, data)) > > In case of handler not matching, don't we need to modify root? > Otherwise we can be stuck in infinite loop here AFAICS. > Done. >> + return io_hdlr; >> + } >> + return NULL; >> +} > > // snip > >> +int gh_vm_mgr_add_io_handler(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr) >> +{ >> + struct rb_node **root, *parent = NULL; >> + >> + if (io_hdlr->datamatch && >> + (!io_hdlr->len || io_hdlr->len > (sizeof(io_hdlr->data) * BITS_PER_BYTE))) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + root = &ghvm->mmio_handler_root.rb_node; >> + while (*root) { >> + struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *curr = rb_entry(*root, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler, >> + node); >> + >> + parent = *root; >> + if (io_hdlr->addr < curr->addr) >> + root = &((*root)->rb_left); >> + else if (io_hdlr->addr > curr->addr) >> + root = &((*root)->rb_right); >> + else > > We should allow two io_handlers on the same addr, but with different data > matches I think. > Done. >> + return -EEXIST; >> + } >> + >> + rb_link_node(&io_hdlr->node, parent, root); >> + rb_insert_color(&io_hdlr->node, &ghvm->mmio_handler_root); >> + return 0; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_vm_mgr_add_io_handler);
* Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com> [2023-02-06 19:59:30]: > > > +int gh_vm_mgr_add_io_handler(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr) > > > +{ > > > + struct rb_node **root, *parent = NULL; > > > + > > > + if (io_hdlr->datamatch && > > > + (!io_hdlr->len || io_hdlr->len > (sizeof(io_hdlr->data) * BITS_PER_BYTE))) io_hdlr->len represents length in bytes AFAICS so the above test should be: (!io_hdlr->len || io_hdlr->len > (sizeof(io_hdlr->data) ))) ?
diff --git a/drivers/virt/gunyah/vm_mgr.c b/drivers/virt/gunyah/vm_mgr.c index ee593cf1b074..1dfe354bcc29 100644 --- a/drivers/virt/gunyah/vm_mgr.c +++ b/drivers/virt/gunyah/vm_mgr.c @@ -185,6 +185,91 @@ void ghvm_remove_resource_ticket(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, struct gunyah_vm_resour } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ghvm_remove_resource_ticket); +static inline bool gh_vm_io_handler_matches(struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr, u64 addr, + u64 len, u64 data) +{ + u64 mask = BIT_ULL(io_hdlr->len * BITS_PER_BYTE) - 1; + + if (io_hdlr->addr != addr) + return false; + + if (!io_hdlr->datamatch) + return true; + + if (io_hdlr->len != len) + return false; + + return (data & mask) == (io_hdlr->data & mask); +} + +static struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *gh_vm_mgr_find_io_hdlr(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, u64 addr, + u64 len, u64 data) +{ + struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr = NULL; + struct rb_node *root = NULL; + + root = ghvm->mmio_handler_root.rb_node; + while (root) { + io_hdlr = rb_entry(root, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler, node); + if (addr < io_hdlr->addr) + root = root->rb_left; + else if (addr > io_hdlr->addr) + root = root->rb_right; + else if (gh_vm_io_handler_matches(io_hdlr, addr, len, data)) + return io_hdlr; + } + return NULL; +} + +int gh_vm_mgr_mmio_write(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, u64 addr, u32 len, u64 data) +{ + struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr = NULL; + + io_hdlr = gh_vm_mgr_find_io_hdlr(ghvm, addr, len, data); + if (!io_hdlr) + return -ENODEV; + + if (io_hdlr->ops && io_hdlr->ops->write) + return io_hdlr->ops->write(io_hdlr, addr, len, data); + + return -ENODEV; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_vm_mgr_mmio_write); + +int gh_vm_mgr_add_io_handler(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr) +{ + struct rb_node **root, *parent = NULL; + + if (io_hdlr->datamatch && + (!io_hdlr->len || io_hdlr->len > (sizeof(io_hdlr->data) * BITS_PER_BYTE))) + return -EINVAL; + + root = &ghvm->mmio_handler_root.rb_node; + while (*root) { + struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *curr = rb_entry(*root, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler, + node); + + parent = *root; + if (io_hdlr->addr < curr->addr) + root = &((*root)->rb_left); + else if (io_hdlr->addr > curr->addr) + root = &((*root)->rb_right); + else + return -EEXIST; + } + + rb_link_node(&io_hdlr->node, parent, root); + rb_insert_color(&io_hdlr->node, &ghvm->mmio_handler_root); + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_vm_mgr_add_io_handler); + +void gh_vm_mgr_remove_io_handler(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_hdlr) +{ + rb_erase(&io_hdlr->node, &ghvm->mmio_handler_root); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_vm_mgr_remove_io_handler); + static void ghvm_put(struct kref *kref) { struct gunyah_vm *ghvm = container_of(kref, struct gunyah_vm, kref); diff --git a/drivers/virt/gunyah/vm_mgr.h b/drivers/virt/gunyah/vm_mgr.h index f52350145010..eb17a2dda2a5 100644 --- a/drivers/virt/gunyah/vm_mgr.h +++ b/drivers/virt/gunyah/vm_mgr.h @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ struct gunyah_vm { struct list_head resources; struct list_head resource_tickets; + struct rb_root mmio_handler_root; + struct list_head functions; }; @@ -62,4 +64,6 @@ struct gunyah_vm_memory_mapping *gh_vm_mem_mapping_find(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, struct gunyah_vm_memory_mapping *gh_vm_mem_mapping_find_mapping(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, u64 gpa, u32 size); +int gh_vm_mgr_mmio_write(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, u64 addr, u32 len, u64 data); + #endif diff --git a/include/linux/gunyah_vm_mgr.h b/include/linux/gunyah_vm_mgr.h index 995a9b0eb6b7..dd719061f3bf 100644 --- a/include/linux/gunyah_vm_mgr.h +++ b/include/linux/gunyah_vm_mgr.h @@ -79,4 +79,29 @@ struct gunyah_vm_resource_ticket { int ghvm_add_resource_ticket(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, struct gunyah_vm_resource_ticket *ticket); void ghvm_remove_resource_ticket(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, struct gunyah_vm_resource_ticket *ticket); +/* + * gunyah_vm_io_handler contains the info about an io device and its associated + * addr and the ops associated with the io device. + */ +struct gunyah_vm_io_handler { + struct rb_node node; + u64 addr; + + bool datamatch; + u8 len; + u64 data; + struct gunyah_vm_io_handler_ops *ops; +}; + +/* + * gunyah_vm_io_handler_ops contains function pointers associated with an iodevice. + */ +struct gunyah_vm_io_handler_ops { + int (*read)(struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_dev, u64 addr, u32 len, u64 data); + int (*write)(struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_dev, u64 addr, u32 len, u64 data); +}; + +int gh_vm_mgr_add_io_handler(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_dev); +void gh_vm_mgr_remove_io_handler(struct gunyah_vm *ghvm, struct gunyah_vm_io_handler *io_dev); + #endif