Message ID | Y9l02DvS6CYThTEG@ZenIV (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Awaiting Upstream |
Headers | show |
Series | [01/10] alpha: fix livelock in uaccess | expand |
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> writes: > riscv equivalent of 26178ec11ef3 "x86: mm: consolidate VM_FAULT_RETRY handling" > If e.g. get_user() triggers a page fault and a fatal signal is caught, we might > end up with handle_mm_fault() returning VM_FAULT_RETRY and not doing anything > to page tables. In such case we must *not* return to the faulting insn - > that would repeat the entire thing without making any progress; what we need > instead is to treat that as failed (user) memory access. > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reproduced with Mark's userland program -- thanks! Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 9:07 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > riscv equivalent of 26178ec11ef3 "x86: mm: consolidate VM_FAULT_RETRY handling" > If e.g. get_user() triggers a page fault and a fatal signal is caught, we might > end up with handle_mm_fault() returning VM_FAULT_RETRY and not doing anything > to page tables. In such case we must *not* return to the faulting insn - > that would repeat the entire thing without making any progress; what we need > instead is to treat that as failed (user) memory access. > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/fault.c b/arch/riscv/mm/fault.c index d86f7cebd4a7..c91d85349d39 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/fault.c @@ -324,8 +324,11 @@ asmlinkage void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs) * signal first. We do not need to release the mmap_lock because it * would already be released in __lock_page_or_retry in mm/filemap.c. */ - if (fault_signal_pending(fault, regs)) + if (fault_signal_pending(fault, regs)) { + if (!user_mode(regs)) + no_context(regs, addr); return; + } /* The fault is fully completed (including releasing mmap lock) */ if (fault & VM_FAULT_COMPLETED)
riscv equivalent of 26178ec11ef3 "x86: mm: consolidate VM_FAULT_RETRY handling" If e.g. get_user() triggers a page fault and a fatal signal is caught, we might end up with handle_mm_fault() returning VM_FAULT_RETRY and not doing anything to page tables. In such case we must *not* return to the faulting insn - that would repeat the entire thing without making any progress; what we need instead is to treat that as failed (user) memory access. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> --- arch/riscv/mm/fault.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)