| Message ID | 20230214103936.1061078-3-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere |
| Headers | show |
| Series | watchdog: mt7621-wdt: avoid globals and arch dependencies | expand |
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dtbs_check' > is performed the following warning appears: > > wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@100' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0-9a-f])?$' > > Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'. > > Reviewed-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Note that we can not apply this and the next patch of the series through the watchdog tree since it crosses a maintainer boundary. Guenter > --- > arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > index 5ca40fd21662..ac818fd721ae 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ sysc: syscon@0 { > "250m", "270m"; > }; > > - wdt: wdt@100 { > + wdt: watchdog@100 { > compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-wdt"; > reg = <0x100 0x100>; > }; > -- > 2.25.1 >
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:11 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dtbs_check' > > is performed the following warning appears: > > > > wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@100' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0-9a-f])?$' > > > > Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'. > > > > Reviewed-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > > Note that we can not apply this and the next patch of the series > through the watchdog tree since it crosses a maintainer boundary. I was expecting Thomas to get these two arch/mips patches or get an Acked-by from him in order for you to apply them. Thanks, Sergio Paracuellos > > Guenter > > > --- > > arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > > index 5ca40fd21662..ac818fd721ae 100644 > > --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ sysc: syscon@0 { > > "250m", "270m"; > > }; > > > > - wdt: wdt@100 { > > + wdt: watchdog@100 { > > compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-wdt"; > > reg = <0x100 0x100>; > > }; > > -- > > 2.25.1 > >
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:12 PM Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:11 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dtbs_check' > > > is performed the following warning appears: > > > > > > wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@100' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0-9a-f])?$' > > > > > > Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> > > > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > > > > Note that we can not apply this and the next patch of the series > > through the watchdog tree since it crosses a maintainer boundary. > > I was expecting Thomas to get these two arch/mips patches or get an > Acked-by from him in order for you to apply them. Hi Thomas, I think you have missed this series since you have started to apply newer stuff in mips-next. Are you ok with taking or Acking patches 2 and 3 of this series? Thanks, Sergio Paracuellos > > Thanks, > Sergio Paracuellos > > > > > Guenter > > > > > --- > > > arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > > > index 5ca40fd21662..ac818fd721ae 100644 > > > --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > > > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ sysc: syscon@0 { > > > "250m", "270m"; > > > }; > > > > > > - wdt: wdt@100 { > > > + wdt: watchdog@100 { > > > compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-wdt"; > > > reg = <0x100 0x100>; > > > }; > > > -- > > > 2.25.1 > > >
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:44:21AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:12 PM Sergio Paracuellos > <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:11 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > > Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dtbs_check' > > > > is performed the following warning appears: > > > > > > > > wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@100' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0-9a-f])?$' > > > > > > > > Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> > > > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> > > > > > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > > > > > > Note that we can not apply this and the next patch of the series > > > through the watchdog tree since it crosses a maintainer boundary. > > > > I was expecting Thomas to get these two arch/mips patches or get an > > Acked-by from him in order for you to apply them. > > Hi Thomas, > > I think you have missed this series since you have started to apply > newer stuff in mips-next. Are you ok with taking or Acking patches 2 > and 3 of this series? yes, I sort of missed it. If it's enough to take patch 2/3 I'll do that. If it's better to keep the series, I'm also ok with acking them. What's the best way forward ? Thomas.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:41 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:44:21AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:12 PM Sergio Paracuellos > > <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:11 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > > > Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dtbs_check' > > > > > is performed the following warning appears: > > > > > > > > > > wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@100' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0-9a-f])?$' > > > > > > > > > > Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'. > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > > > > > > > > Note that we can not apply this and the next patch of the series > > > > through the watchdog tree since it crosses a maintainer boundary. > > > > > > I was expecting Thomas to get these two arch/mips patches or get an > > > Acked-by from him in order for you to apply them. > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > I think you have missed this series since you have started to apply > > newer stuff in mips-next. Are you ok with taking or Acking patches 2 > > and 3 of this series? > > yes, I sort of missed it. If it's enough to take patch 2/3 I'll do that. > If it's better to keep the series, I'm also ok with acking them. > What's the best way forward ? Both trees work for me. The rest of the patches of this series should go through the watchdog tree. Guenter, what is better for you? Thanks, Sergio Paracuellos > > Thomas. > > -- > Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a > good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
On 2/28/23 00:51, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:41 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer > <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:44:21AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:12 PM Sergio Paracuellos >>> <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:11 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: >>>>>> Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dtbs_check' >>>>>> is performed the following warning appears: >>>>>> >>>>>> wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@100' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0-9a-f])?$' >>>>>> >>>>>> Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'. >>>>>> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> >>>>> >>>>> Note that we can not apply this and the next patch of the series >>>>> through the watchdog tree since it crosses a maintainer boundary. >>>> >>>> I was expecting Thomas to get these two arch/mips patches or get an >>>> Acked-by from him in order for you to apply them. >>> >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>> I think you have missed this series since you have started to apply >>> newer stuff in mips-next. Are you ok with taking or Acking patches 2 >>> and 3 of this series? >> >> yes, I sort of missed it. If it's enough to take patch 2/3 I'll do that. >> If it's better to keep the series, I'm also ok with acking them. >> What's the best way forward ? > > Both trees work for me. The rest of the patches of this series should > go through the watchdog tree. Guenter, what is better for you? > Wim is handling pull requests. He has queued the other three patches in his tree. I would suggest to apply the two remaining patches through the mips tree. Guenter > Thanks, > Sergio Paracuellos > >> >> Thomas. >> >> -- >> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a >> good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 3:55 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > On 2/28/23 00:51, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:41 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer > > <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:44:21AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:12 PM Sergio Paracuellos > >>> <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:11 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > >>>>>> Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dtbs_check' > >>>>>> is performed the following warning appears: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@100' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0-9a-f])?$' > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> > >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > >>>>> > >>>>> Note that we can not apply this and the next patch of the series > >>>>> through the watchdog tree since it crosses a maintainer boundary. > >>>> > >>>> I was expecting Thomas to get these two arch/mips patches or get an > >>>> Acked-by from him in order for you to apply them. > >>> > >>> Hi Thomas, > >>> > >>> I think you have missed this series since you have started to apply > >>> newer stuff in mips-next. Are you ok with taking or Acking patches 2 > >>> and 3 of this series? > >> > >> yes, I sort of missed it. If it's enough to take patch 2/3 I'll do that. > >> If it's better to keep the series, I'm also ok with acking them. > >> What's the best way forward ? > > > > Both trees work for me. The rest of the patches of this series should > > go through the watchdog tree. Guenter, what is better for you? > > > > Wim is handling pull requests. He has queued the other three patches in his > tree. I would suggest to apply the two remaining patches through the mips > tree. Thanks for letting me know, Guenter. Thomas, please, take the patches 2 and 3 through the mips tree, then. Thanks, Sergio Paracuellos > > Guenter > > > Thanks, > > Sergio Paracuellos > > > >> > >> Thomas. > >> > >> -- > >> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a > >> good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ] >
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dtbs_check' > is performed the following warning appears: > > wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@100' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0-9a-f])?$' > > Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'. > > Reviewed-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> > --- > arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > index 5ca40fd21662..ac818fd721ae 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ sysc: syscon@0 { > "250m", "270m"; > }; > > - wdt: wdt@100 { > + wdt: watchdog@100 { > compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-wdt"; > reg = <0x100 0x100>; > }; > -- > 2.25.1 applied to mips-next. Thomas.
diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi index 5ca40fd21662..ac818fd721ae 100644 --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ sysc: syscon@0 { "250m", "270m"; }; - wdt: wdt@100 { + wdt: watchdog@100 { compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-wdt"; reg = <0x100 0x100>; };