Message ID | 20230224143148.60-1-void0red@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] usb: gadget: udc: replace kzalloc with devm_kzalloc in mv_udc_probe and add a check for this allocation. | expand |
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:31:48PM +0800, void0red wrote: > From: Kang Chen <void0red@gmail.com> > > This driver uses the unified memory management api, so replace > kzalloc with devm_kzalloc to avoid a memory leak and add a check > for this allocation. > > Reported-by: eriri <1527030098@qq.com> > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217081 > > Signed-off-by: Kang Chen <void0red@gmail.com> > --- > v2 -> v1: replace kzalloc with devm_kzalloc I see 2 v2 patches on the mailing list, how am I supposed to know which one is correct? Please fix up and resend a v3. thanks, greg k-h
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/mv_udc_core.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/mv_udc_core.c index b397f3a84..08474c08d 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/mv_udc_core.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/mv_udc_core.c @@ -2229,7 +2229,11 @@ static int mv_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&udc->status_req->queue); /* allocate a small amount of memory to get valid address */ - udc->status_req->req.buf = kzalloc(8, GFP_KERNEL); + udc->status_req->req.buf = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, 8, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!udc->status_req->req.buf) { + retval = -ENOMEM; + goto err_destroy_dma; + } udc->status_req->req.dma = DMA_ADDR_INVALID; udc->resume_state = USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED;