@@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ static bool oa_buffer_check_unlocked(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
bool pollin;
u32 hw_tail;
u64 now;
+ u32 partial_report_size;
/* We have to consider the (unlikely) possibility that read() errors
* could result in an OA buffer reset which might reset the head and
@@ -543,10 +544,15 @@ static bool oa_buffer_check_unlocked(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
hw_tail = stream->perf->ops.oa_hw_tail_read(stream);
- /* The tail pointer increases in 64 byte increments,
- * not in report_size steps...
+ /* The tail pointer increases in 64 byte increments, not in report_size
+ * steps. Also the report size may not be a power of 2. Compute
+ * potentially partially landed report in the OA buffer
*/
- hw_tail &= ~(report_size - 1);
+ partial_report_size = OA_TAKEN(hw_tail, stream->oa_buffer.tail);
+ partial_report_size %= report_size;
+
+ /* Subtract partial amount off the tail */
+ hw_tail = gtt_offset + OA_TAKEN(hw_tail, partial_report_size);
now = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
@@ -669,6 +675,8 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
{
int report_size = stream->oa_buffer.format->size;
struct drm_i915_perf_record_header header;
+ int report_size_partial;
+ u8 *oa_buf_end;
header.type = DRM_I915_PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE;
header.pad = 0;
@@ -682,8 +690,20 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
return -EFAULT;
buf += sizeof(header);
- if (copy_to_user(buf, report, report_size))
+ oa_buf_end = stream->oa_buffer.vaddr + OA_BUFFER_SIZE;
+ report_size_partial = oa_buf_end - report;
+
+ if (report_size_partial < report_size) {
+ if (copy_to_user(buf, report, report_size_partial))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ buf += report_size_partial;
+
+ if (copy_to_user(buf, stream->oa_buffer.vaddr,
+ report_size - report_size_partial))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ } else if (copy_to_user(buf, report, report_size)) {
return -EFAULT;
+ }
(*offset) += header.size;
@@ -747,12 +767,11 @@ static int gen8_append_oa_reports(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
* An out of bounds or misaligned head or tail pointer implies a driver
* bug since we validate + align the tail pointers we read from the
* hardware and we are in full control of the head pointer which should
- * only be incremented by multiples of the report size (notably also
- * all a power of two).
+ * only be incremented by multiples of the report size.
*/
if (drm_WARN_ONCE(&uncore->i915->drm,
- head > OA_BUFFER_SIZE || head % report_size ||
- tail > OA_BUFFER_SIZE || tail % report_size,
+ head > OA_BUFFER_SIZE ||
+ tail > OA_BUFFER_SIZE,
"Inconsistent OA buffer pointers: head = %u, tail = %u\n",
head, tail))
return -EIO;
@@ -766,22 +785,6 @@ static int gen8_append_oa_reports(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
u32 ctx_id;
u64 reason;
- /*
- * All the report sizes factor neatly into the buffer
- * size so we never expect to see a report split
- * between the beginning and end of the buffer.
- *
- * Given the initial alignment check a misalignment
- * here would imply a driver bug that would result
- * in an overrun.
- */
- if (drm_WARN_ON(&uncore->i915->drm,
- (OA_BUFFER_SIZE - head) < report_size)) {
- drm_err(&uncore->i915->drm,
- "Spurious OA head ptr: non-integral report offset\n");
- break;
- }
-
/*
* The reason field includes flags identifying what
* triggered this specific report (mostly timer
Some of the newer OA formats are not powers of 2. For those formats, adjust the hw_tail accordingly when checking for new reports. v2: (Ashutosh) - Switch to OA_TAKEN for diff calculation - Use OA_BUFFER_SIZE instead of the vma size - Update comments Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)