Message ID | 20230307-bpf-kfuncs-warray-bounds-v1-1-00ad3191f3a6@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 2d5bcdcda8799cf21f9ab84598c946dd320207a2 |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | [bpf-next] bpf: Increase size of BTF_ID_LIST without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF again | expand |
On 3/7/23 7:14 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > After commit 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and > bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr"), clang builds without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF > warn: > > kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10298:24: warning: array index 16 is past the end of the array (that has type 'u32[16]' (aka 'unsigned int[16]')) [-Warray-bounds] > meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr]) { > ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9150:1: note: array 'special_kfunc_list' declared here > BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list) > ^ > include/linux/btf_ids.h:207:27: note: expanded from macro 'BTF_ID_LIST' > #define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16]; > ^ > 1 warning generated. > > A warning of this nature was previously addressed by > commit beb3d47d1d3d ("bpf: Fix a BTF_ID_LIST bug with > CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF not set") but there have been new kfuncs added > since then. > > Quadruple the size of the CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=n definition so that > this problem is unlikely to show up for some time. > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1810 > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> This has a better commit message, let's use this one. FWIW, gcc 13 -Warray-bounds, did not catch this. Reviewed-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > --- > include/linux/btf_ids.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h > index 3a4f7cd882ca..00950cc03bff 100644 > --- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h > +++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h > @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ extern struct btf_id_set8 name; > > #else > > -#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16]; > +#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[64]; > #define BTF_ID(prefix, name) > #define BTF_ID_FLAGS(prefix, name, ...) > #define BTF_ID_UNUSED > > --- > base-commit: 36e5e391a25af28dc1f4586f95d577b38ff4ed72 > change-id: 20230307-bpf-kfuncs-warray-bounds-c2040e8ee7ee > > Best regards,
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:14 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote: > > After commit 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and > bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr"), clang builds without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF please don't break commit subj into multiple lines. I've fixed it manually this time while applying. > warn: > > kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10298:24: warning: array index 16 is past the end of the array (that has type 'u32[16]' (aka 'unsigned int[16]')) [-Warray-bounds] > meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr]) { > ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9150:1: note: array 'special_kfunc_list' declared here > BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list) > ^ > include/linux/btf_ids.h:207:27: note: expanded from macro 'BTF_ID_LIST' > #define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16]; > ^ > 1 warning generated. > > A warning of this nature was previously addressed by > commit beb3d47d1d3d ("bpf: Fix a BTF_ID_LIST bug with > CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF not set") but there have been new kfuncs added and here. > since then. > > Quadruple the size of the CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=n definition so that > this problem is unlikely to show up for some time. > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1810 > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> > --- > include/linux/btf_ids.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h > index 3a4f7cd882ca..00950cc03bff 100644 > --- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h > +++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h > @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ extern struct btf_id_set8 name; > > #else > > -#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16]; > +#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[64]; > #define BTF_ID(prefix, name) > #define BTF_ID_FLAGS(prefix, name, ...) > #define BTF_ID_UNUSED > > --- > base-commit: 36e5e391a25af28dc1f4586f95d577b38ff4ed72 > change-id: 20230307-bpf-kfuncs-warray-bounds-c2040e8ee7ee > > Best regards, > -- > Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> >
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>: On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 08:14:06 -0700 you wrote: > After commit 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and > bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr"), clang builds without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF > warn: > > kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10298:24: warning: array index 16 is past the end of the array (that has type 'u32[16]' (aka 'unsigned int[16]')) [-Warray-bounds] > meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr]) { > ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9150:1: note: array 'special_kfunc_list' declared here > BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list) > ^ > include/linux/btf_ids.h:207:27: note: expanded from macro 'BTF_ID_LIST' > #define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16]; > ^ > 1 warning generated. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] bpf: Increase size of BTF_ID_LIST without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF again https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2d5bcdcda879 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h index 3a4f7cd882ca..00950cc03bff 100644 --- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h +++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ extern struct btf_id_set8 name; #else -#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16]; +#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[64]; #define BTF_ID(prefix, name) #define BTF_ID_FLAGS(prefix, name, ...) #define BTF_ID_UNUSED
After commit 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr"), clang builds without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF warn: kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10298:24: warning: array index 16 is past the end of the array (that has type 'u32[16]' (aka 'unsigned int[16]')) [-Warray-bounds] meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr]) { ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9150:1: note: array 'special_kfunc_list' declared here BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list) ^ include/linux/btf_ids.h:207:27: note: expanded from macro 'BTF_ID_LIST' #define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16]; ^ 1 warning generated. A warning of this nature was previously addressed by commit beb3d47d1d3d ("bpf: Fix a BTF_ID_LIST bug with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF not set") but there have been new kfuncs added since then. Quadruple the size of the CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=n definition so that this problem is unlikely to show up for some time. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1810 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> --- include/linux/btf_ids.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- base-commit: 36e5e391a25af28dc1f4586f95d577b38ff4ed72 change-id: 20230307-bpf-kfuncs-warray-bounds-c2040e8ee7ee Best regards,