Message ID | 20230304074107.59083-1-shawn.guo@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Mainlined, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [RESEND] cpuidle: psci: Iterate backwards over list in psci_pd_remove() | expand |
On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 8:41 AM Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote: > > In case that psci_pd_init_topology() fails for some reason, > psci_pd_remove() will be responsible for deleting provider and removing > genpd from psci_pd_providers list. There will be a failure when removing > the cluster PD, because the cpu (child) PDs haven't been removed. > > [ 0.050232] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu0 > [ 0.050278] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu1 > [ 0.050329] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu2 > [ 0.050370] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu3 > [ 0.050422] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu-cluster0 > [ 0.050475] PM: genpd_remove: unable to remove cpu-cluster0 > [ 0.051412] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu3 > [ 0.051449] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu2 > [ 0.051499] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu1 > [ 0.051546] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu0 > > Fix the problem by iterating the provider list reversely, so that parent > PD gets removed after child's PDs like below. > > [ 0.029052] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu0 > [ 0.029076] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu1 > [ 0.029103] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu2 > [ 0.029124] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu3 > [ 0.029151] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu-cluster0 > [ 0.029647] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu0 > [ 0.029666] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu1 > [ 0.029690] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu2 > [ 0.029714] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu3 > [ 0.029738] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu-cluster0 > > Fixes: a65a397f2451 ("cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd") So I guess there should be Cc: stable for 5.10 and later? > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > --- > Hi Rafael, > > This is a resend of the patch [1]. Could you help pick it up or let me > know if there is anything need to be improved, thanks! Is this regarded as 6.3-rc material, or can it wait for 6.4?
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 02:06:31PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 8:41 AM Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > In case that psci_pd_init_topology() fails for some reason, > > psci_pd_remove() will be responsible for deleting provider and removing > > genpd from psci_pd_providers list. There will be a failure when removing > > the cluster PD, because the cpu (child) PDs haven't been removed. > > > > [ 0.050232] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu0 > > [ 0.050278] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu1 > > [ 0.050329] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu2 > > [ 0.050370] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu3 > > [ 0.050422] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu-cluster0 > > [ 0.050475] PM: genpd_remove: unable to remove cpu-cluster0 > > [ 0.051412] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu3 > > [ 0.051449] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu2 > > [ 0.051499] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu1 > > [ 0.051546] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu0 > > > > Fix the problem by iterating the provider list reversely, so that parent > > PD gets removed after child's PDs like below. > > > > [ 0.029052] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu0 > > [ 0.029076] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu1 > > [ 0.029103] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu2 > > [ 0.029124] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu3 > > [ 0.029151] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu-cluster0 > > [ 0.029647] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu0 > > [ 0.029666] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu1 > > [ 0.029690] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu2 > > [ 0.029714] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu3 > > [ 0.029738] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu-cluster0 > > > > Fixes: a65a397f2451 ("cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd") > > So I guess there should be Cc: stable for 5.10 and later? Yes. I was thinking that stable team will pick it up due to the Fixes tag, but yes, explicitly copying stable would be the best. > > > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > > --- > > Hi Rafael, > > > > This is a resend of the patch [1]. Could you help pick it up or let me > > know if there is anything need to be improved, thanks! > > Is this regarded as 6.3-rc material, or can it wait for 6.4? As it's regarded as a fix, it would nice to apply it for 6.3-rc. Shawn
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c index c80cf9ddabd8..1fca250d5dec 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c @@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ static void psci_pd_remove(void) struct psci_pd_provider *pd_provider, *it; struct generic_pm_domain *genpd; - list_for_each_entry_safe(pd_provider, it, &psci_pd_providers, link) { + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(pd_provider, it, + &psci_pd_providers, link) { of_genpd_del_provider(pd_provider->node); genpd = of_genpd_remove_last(pd_provider->node);