Message ID | 20230314070208.3703963-1-michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Fix PHY handle no longer parsing | expand |
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 03:02:06PM +0800, Michael Sit Wei Hong wrote: > After the fixed link support was introduced, it is observed that PHY > no longer attach to the MAC properly. You are aware, I hope, that fixed-link and having a PHY are mutually exclusive? In other words, you can't use fixed-link to specify parameters for a PHY.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> > Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2023 4:54 AM > To: Sit, Michael Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com> > Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>; Alexandre > Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>; Jose Abreu > <joabreu@synopsys.com>; David S . Miller > <davem@davemloft.net>; Eric Dumazet > <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; > Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; Maxime Coquelin > <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>; Ong, Boon Leong > <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux- > stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Looi, > Hong Aun <hong.aun.looi@intel.com>; Voon, Weifeng > <weifeng.voon@intel.com>; Lai, Peter Jun Ann > <peter.jun.ann.lai@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] Fix PHY handle no longer parsing > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 03:02:06PM +0800, Michael Sit Wei Hong > wrote: > > After the fixed link support was introduced, it is observed that > PHY > > no longer attach to the MAC properly. > > You are aware, I hope, that fixed-link and having a PHY are > mutually exclusive? > > In other words, you can't use fixed-link to specify parameters for > a PHY. > Yes but when the fixed-link support code was added, all our non fixed-link devices are not attaching the PHYs to the MACs, hence the reason for this patch series, to ensure both fixed-link and non fixed-link scenarios work properly. > -- > RMK's Patch system: > https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at > last!
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 08:37:48AM +0000, Sit, Michael Wei Hong wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> > > Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2023 4:54 AM > > To: Sit, Michael Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@intel.com> > > Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>; Alexandre > > Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>; Jose Abreu > > <joabreu@synopsys.com>; David S . Miller > > <davem@davemloft.net>; Eric Dumazet > > <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; > > Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; Maxime Coquelin > > <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>; Ong, Boon Leong > > <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com; linux-arm- > > kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Looi, > > Hong Aun <hong.aun.looi@intel.com>; Voon, Weifeng > > <weifeng.voon@intel.com>; Lai, Peter Jun Ann > > <peter.jun.ann.lai@intel.com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] Fix PHY handle no longer parsing > > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 03:02:06PM +0800, Michael Sit Wei Hong > > wrote: > > > After the fixed link support was introduced, it is observed that > > PHY > > > no longer attach to the MAC properly. > > > > You are aware, I hope, that fixed-link and having a PHY are > > mutually exclusive? > > > > In other words, you can't use fixed-link to specify parameters for > > a PHY. > > > Yes but when the fixed-link support code was added, all our non > fixed-link devices are not attaching the PHYs to the MACs, hence > the reason for this patch series, to ensure both fixed-link and > non fixed-link scenarios work properly. Ah, it's the "there should be a PHY here" case you're trying to cater for, rather than actually a fixed-link. So, how about adding a helper that is basically: bool phylink_expects_phy(struct phylink *phylink) { return pl->cfg_link_an_mode == MLO_AN_PHY; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phylink_expects_phy); and use that to test whether you need to manually find a PHY to attach, rather than trying to detect whether a fixed-link stanza appears in firmware? Thanks.