Message ID | 20230320221002.4191007-3-oliver.upton@linux.dev (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: arm64: Userspace SMCCC call filtering | expand |
Hi Oliver, On 20/03/2023 22:09, Oliver Upton wrote: > The test_bit(...) pattern is quite a lot of keystrokes. Replace > existing callsites with a helper. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++ > arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 4 ++-- There is one more instance in arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c at kvm_arm_set_fw_reg_bmap(). Is there a reason why that can't be replaced ? Otherwise, looks good to me. Suzuki
Hi Suzuki, On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 09:42:25AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On 20/03/2023 22:09, Oliver Upton wrote: > > The test_bit(...) pattern is quite a lot of keystrokes. Replace > > existing callsites with a helper. > > > > No functional change intended. > > > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++ > > arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 4 ++-- > > There is one more instance in arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c at > kvm_arm_set_fw_reg_bmap(). Is there a reason why that can't be replaced ? Oops! Missed that one. I'll address it in v2.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index bcd774d74f34..d091d1c9890b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -1061,6 +1061,9 @@ bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); (system_supports_32bit_el0() && \ !static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) +#define kvm_vm_has_ran_once(kvm) \ + (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HAS_RAN_ONCE, &(kvm)->arch.flags)) + int kvm_trng_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); #ifdef CONFIG_KVM extern phys_addr_t hyp_mem_base; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c index 24908400e190..a0fc569fdbca 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c @@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_pmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int pmu_id) list_for_each_entry(entry, &arm_pmus, entry) { arm_pmu = entry->arm_pmu; if (arm_pmu->pmu.type == pmu_id) { - if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HAS_RAN_ONCE, &kvm->arch.flags) || + if (kvm_vm_has_ran_once(kvm) || (kvm->arch.pmu_filter && kvm->arch.arm_pmu != arm_pmu)) { ret = -EBUSY; break; @@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); - if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HAS_RAN_ONCE, &kvm->arch.flags)) { + if (kvm_vm_has_ran_once(kvm)) { mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); return -EBUSY; }
The test_bit(...) pattern is quite a lot of keystrokes. Replace existing callsites with a helper. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++ arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)