Message ID | 20230322114241.88118-3-qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 2b310e064e797a07765afd4b61c61de70d57ac78 |
Headers | show |
Series | Stop kfree_scale_thread thread(s) after unloading rcuscale | expand |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 07:42:41PM +0800, Qiuxu Zhuo wrote: > When running the 'kfree_rcu_test' test case with commands [1] the call > trace [2] was thrown. This was because the kfree_scale_thread thread(s) > still run after unloading rcuscale and torture modules. Fix the call > trace by invoking kfree_scale_cleanup() from rcu_scale_cleanup() when > removing the rcuscale module. > > [1] modprobe rcuscale kfree_rcu_test=1 > // After some time > rmmod rcuscale > rmmod torture > > [2] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffc0601a87 > #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode > #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page > PGD 11de4f067 P4D 11de4f067 PUD 11de51067 PMD 112f4d067 PTE 0 > Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI > CPU: 1 PID: 1798 Comm: kfree_scale_thr Not tainted 6.3.0-rc1-rcu+ #1 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 > RIP: 0010:0xffffffffc0601a87 > Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffc0601a5d. > RSP: 0018:ffffb25bc2e57e18 EFLAGS: 00010297 > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffc061f0b6 RCX: 0000000000000000 > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff962fd0de RDI: ffffffff962fd0de > RBP: ffffb25bc2e57ea8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000000000a R15: 00000000001c1dbe > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff921fa2200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: ffffffffc0601a5d CR3: 000000011de4c006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > ? kvfree_call_rcu+0xf0/0x3a0 > ? kthread+0xf3/0x120 > ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 > ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 > </TASK> > Modules linked in: rfkill sunrpc ... [last unloaded: torture] > CR2: ffffffffc0601a87 > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > Fixes: e6e78b004fa7 ("rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests") > Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> > Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> > Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com> Much better, thank you! I queued and pushed both of them. Thanx, Paul > --- > kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c > index 7e8965b0827a..d1221731c7cf 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c > @@ -797,6 +797,11 @@ rcu_scale_cleanup(void) > if (gp_exp && gp_async) > SCALEOUT_ERRSTRING("No expedited async GPs, so went with async!"); > > + if (kfree_rcu_test) { > + kfree_scale_cleanup(); > + return; > + } > + > if (torture_cleanup_begin()) > return; > if (!cur_ops) { > -- > 2.17.1 >
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c index 7e8965b0827a..d1221731c7cf 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c @@ -797,6 +797,11 @@ rcu_scale_cleanup(void) if (gp_exp && gp_async) SCALEOUT_ERRSTRING("No expedited async GPs, so went with async!"); + if (kfree_rcu_test) { + kfree_scale_cleanup(); + return; + } + if (torture_cleanup_begin()) return; if (!cur_ops) {