Message ID | cover.1680176068.git.pengdonglin@sangfor.com.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | function_graph: Support recording and printing the return value of function | expand |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 04:39:07AM -0700, Donglin Peng wrote: > v9: > - Fix align issues in ARM asm code > - Fix align issues in LoongArch asm code > - Update commit messages > - Update comments for ftrace_return_to_handler > > v8: > - Fix issues in ARM64 asm code > - Fix issues in selftest > - Add some comments on CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL > - Make CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL switable > - Modify the control range of CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL Please control your spamming: From: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst Don't get discouraged - or impatient ------------------------------------ After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait. Reviewers are busy people and may not get to your patch right away. Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment, but the development process works more smoothly than that now. You should receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure that you have sent your patches to the right place. Wait for a minimum of ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ busy times like merge windows.
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:59:48 +0200 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote: > Please control your spamming: > > From: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > > Don't get discouraged - or impatient > ------------------------------------ > > After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait. Reviewers are > busy people and may not get to your patch right away. > > Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment, > but the development process works more smoothly than that now. You should > receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure > that you have sent your patches to the right place. Wait for a minimum of > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > busy times like merge windows. To be fair, this isn't a ping or a resend. It's addressing comments that were given in v8 that was sent out on Tuesday. This isn't v1, where I would agree with waiting a week for comments. v1 was sent back in 3/6. I do not expect (nor want) someone to wait a week on v8 for all feedback to come in, unless it was a redesign of the code. But it's now starting to settle, and that "week waiting" period isn't necessary for fixing up minor suggestions by the reviewers. I was hoping this would be good to go by the end of the week, so I could get it into linux-next by next week. -- Steve