| Message ID | 20221226075412.61167-1-likexu@tencent.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | x86/pmu: Add TSX testcase and fix force_emulation_prefix | expand |
CC more KUT maintainers, could anyone pick up these two minor x86 tests ? On 26/12/2022 3:54 pm, Like Xu wrote: > We have adopted a test-driven development approach for vPMU's features, > and these two fixes below cover the paths for at least two corner use cases. > > Like Xu (2): > x86/pmu: Add Intel Guest Transactional (commited) cycles testcase > x86/pmu: Wrap the written counter value with gp_counter_width > > x86/pmu.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >
On 14/02/2023 07.47, Like Xu wrote: > CC more KUT maintainers, could anyone pick up these two minor x86 tests ? Your patches never made it to my inbox - I guess they got stuck in a mail filter on the way ... Paolo, Sean, did you get them? Thomas > On 26/12/2022 3:54 pm, Like Xu wrote: >> We have adopted a test-driven development approach for vPMU's features, >> and these two fixes below cover the paths for at least two corner use cases. >> >> Like Xu (2): >> x86/pmu: Add Intel Guest Transactional (commited) cycles testcase >> x86/pmu: Wrap the written counter value with gp_counter_width >> >> x86/pmu.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 14/02/2023 07.47, Like Xu wrote: > > CC more KUT maintainers, could anyone pick up these two minor x86 tests ? > > Your patches never made it to my inbox - I guess they got stuck in a mail > filter on the way ... Paolo, Sean, did you get them? Yeah, I have them. I'll prep a pull request, there are many KUT x86 patches floating around that need to get merged. Will likely take me a few days though.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, Thomas Huth wrote: > > On 14/02/2023 07.47, Like Xu wrote: > > > CC more KUT maintainers, could anyone pick up these two minor x86 tests ? > > > > Your patches never made it to my inbox - I guess they got stuck in a mail > > filter on the way ... Paolo, Sean, did you get them? > > Yeah, I have them. I'll prep a pull request, there are many KUT x86 patches > floating around that need to get merged. Will likely take me a few days though. Gah, forgot about this series. I'll plan on doing another pull request next week, there are more outstanding KUT patches besides this one. And I'm finally diving into KVM PMU stuff tomorrow, too.
On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 15:54:10 +0800, Like Xu wrote: > We have adopted a test-driven development approach for vPMU's features, > and these two fixes below cover the paths for at least two corner use cases. > > Like Xu (2): > x86/pmu: Add Intel Guest Transactional (commited) cycles testcase > x86/pmu: Wrap the written counter value with gp_counter_width > > [...] Applied to kvm-x86 next, thanks! [1/2] x86/pmu: Add Intel Guest Transactional (commited) cycles testcase https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/commit/ece17cfebc27 [2/2] x86/pmu: Wrap the written counter value with gp_counter_width https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/15507bb0 -- https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/tree/next