[v2,net-next,00/10] mtk: wed: move cpuboot, ilm and dlm in dedicated dts nodes

Message

Lorenzo Bianconi March 31, 2023, 1:12 p.m. UTC

Since cpuboot, ilm and dlm memory region are not part of MT7986 SoC RAM,
move them in dedicated mt7986a syscon dts nodes.
At the same time we keep backward-compatibility with older dts version where
cpuboot, ilm and dlm were defined as reserved-memory child nodes.

Changes since v1:
- fix dts schema compilation error
- rebase on top of net-next

Lorenzo Bianconi (10):
  net: ethernet: mtk_wed: rename mtk_wed_get_memory_region in
    mtk_wed_get_reserved_memory_region
  net: ethernet: mtk_wed: move cpuboot in a dedicated dts node
  dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: move cpuboot in a dedicated dts node
  arm64: dts: mt7986: move cpuboot in a dedicated node
  net: ethernet: mtk_wed: move ilm a dedicated dts node
  dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: move ilm in a dedicated dts node
  arm64: dts: mt7986: move ilm in a dedicated node
  net: ethernet: mtk_wed: move dlm a dedicated dts node
  dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: move dlm in a dedicated dts node
  arm64: dts: mt7986: move dlm in a dedicated node

 .../arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt7622-wed.yaml     | 30 ++++---
 .../mediatek/mediatek,mt7986-wo-cpuboot.yaml  | 45 ++++++++++
 .../soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt7986-wo-dlm.yaml  | 46 ++++++++++
 .../soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt7986-wo-ilm.yaml  | 45 ++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7986a.dtsi     | 69 +++++++-------
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c       | 19 ++++
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_mcu.c   | 89 ++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed_wo.h    |  3 +-
 8 files changed, 289 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt7986-wo-cpuboot.yaml
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt7986-wo-dlm.yaml
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mt7986-wo-ilm.yaml

Comments

Rob Herring (Arm) April 6, 2023, 3:25 p.m. UTC | #1

On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 03:12:36PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Since cpuboot, ilm and dlm memory region are not part of MT7986 SoC RAM,

That's not really a requirement. Is that the only "problem" here?

Certainly going from a standard binding to a custom phandle reference is 
not an improvement.

> move them in dedicated mt7986a syscon dts nodes.

What makes them a syscon? Are they memory or h/w registers? Can't be 
both...

Perhaps mmio-sram?

> At the same time we keep backward-compatibility with older dts version where
> cpuboot, ilm and dlm were defined as reserved-memory child nodes.

Doesn't really seem big enough issue to justify carrying this.

Rob

Lorenzo Bianconi April 10, 2023, 2:54 p.m. UTC | #2

> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 03:12:36PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Since cpuboot, ilm and dlm memory region are not part of MT7986 SoC RAM,
> 
> That's not really a requirement. Is that the only "problem" here?

I would say this series allows to be closer to a standard binding and at the
same time helps with uboot compatibility.

> 
> Certainly going from a standard binding to a custom phandle reference is 
> not an improvement.
> 
> > move them in dedicated mt7986a syscon dts nodes.
> 
> What makes them a syscon? Are they memory or h/w registers? Can't be 
> both...

> 
> Perhaps mmio-sram?

ilm and dlm do not have h/w registers afaik, they are chip memory used
to store firmware information, syscon is just the closest binding I found.
I did not find mmio-sram, my fault.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> > At the same time we keep backward-compatibility with older dts version where
> > cpuboot, ilm and dlm were defined as reserved-memory child nodes.
> 
> Doesn't really seem big enough issue to justify carrying this.
> 
> Rob