Message ID | 20230411174644.GI360889@frogsfrogsfrogs (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Deferred, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | xfs_db: fix inverted logic in error path | expand |
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:46:44AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> > > smatch complains proceeding into the if body if leaf is a null pointer. > This is backwards, so correct that. > > check.c:3455 process_leaf_node_dir_v2_int() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'leaf' > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> > --- > db/check.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/db/check.c b/db/check.c > index 964756d0..d5f3d225 100644 > --- a/db/check.c > +++ b/db/check.c > @@ -3452,7 +3452,7 @@ process_leaf_node_dir_v2_int( > id->ino, dabno, stale, > be16_to_cpu(leaf3->hdr.stale)); > error++; > - } else if (!leaf && stale != be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.stale)) { > + } else if (leaf && stale != be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.stale)) { > if (!sflag || v) > dbprintf(_("dir %lld block %d stale mismatch " > "%d/%d\n"), Looks good. I'm surprised the compiler didn't warn about this obviously broken code... Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 09:59:03AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:46:44AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> > > > > smatch complains proceeding into the if body if leaf is a null pointer. > > This is backwards, so correct that. > > > > check.c:3455 process_leaf_node_dir_v2_int() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'leaf' > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> > > --- > > db/check.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/db/check.c b/db/check.c > > index 964756d0..d5f3d225 100644 > > --- a/db/check.c > > +++ b/db/check.c > > @@ -3452,7 +3452,7 @@ process_leaf_node_dir_v2_int( > > id->ino, dabno, stale, > > be16_to_cpu(leaf3->hdr.stale)); > > error++; > > - } else if (!leaf && stale != be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.stale)) { > > + } else if (leaf && stale != be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.stale)) { > > if (!sflag || v) > > dbprintf(_("dir %lld block %d stale mismatch " > > "%d/%d\n"), > > Looks good. I'm surprised the compiler didn't warn about this > obviously broken code... > > Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> NAK, this logic is actually trying to switch between the V4 and V5 directory format logic, but it's using the subtlety that @leaf3 is a null pointer for a V4 fs and non-null for a V5 fs. Hence this check really should be: } else if (!leaf3 && stale != be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.stale)) { Even though that looks *totally* wrong. But xfs_check is deprecated, so fmeh. So I'll go fix that and rerun through testing. I had thought this was fine, but xfs/291 barfed up errors overnight. --D > -- > Dave Chinner > david@fromorbit.com
diff --git a/db/check.c b/db/check.c index 964756d0..d5f3d225 100644 --- a/db/check.c +++ b/db/check.c @@ -3452,7 +3452,7 @@ process_leaf_node_dir_v2_int( id->ino, dabno, stale, be16_to_cpu(leaf3->hdr.stale)); error++; - } else if (!leaf && stale != be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.stale)) { + } else if (leaf && stale != be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.stale)) { if (!sflag || v) dbprintf(_("dir %lld block %d stale mismatch " "%d/%d\n"),