Message ID | 20230403193250.108693-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Improve RK3588 clocks and power domains support | expand |
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 21:32:48 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > After this patchset the power-domain support for RK3588 is basically on par > with the downstream implementation. More importantly the clock controller > change unblocks support for any IP blocks using linked clocks. The clock > controller change must be applied before the power-domain change to avoid > accessing unclocked registers. > > Changes since PATCHv1: > * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230331163058.5688-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/ > * Replace dsb(sy) with wmb() to fix COMPILE_TEST build on !arm64; direct replacement > would be mb(), but write memory barrier should be enough here as far as I can tell > * Added Tested-by from Vincent Legoll > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/2] clk: rockchip: rk3588: make gate linked clocks ignore unused commit: 64042c28c3bb6729df8e2fda89bc7ebbe3790907 Best regards,
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 21:32:48 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > After this patchset the power-domain support for RK3588 is basically on par > with the downstream implementation. More importantly the clock controller > change unblocks support for any IP blocks using linked clocks. The clock > controller change must be applied before the power-domain change to avoid > accessing unclocked registers. > > Changes since PATCHv1: > * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230331163058.5688-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com/ > * Replace dsb(sy) with wmb() to fix COMPILE_TEST build on !arm64; direct replacement > would be mb(), but write memory barrier should be enough here as far as I can tell > * Added Tested-by from Vincent Legoll > > [...] Applied, thanks! [2/2] soc: rockchip: power-domain: add rk3588 mem module support commit: 632a6b6593d5bfe9932490f8483195bbf50cbbb7 For 6.5, so this will get a rebase after 6.4-rc1. Best regards,