Message ID | 20230416194624.1258860-1-mmyangfl@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | clk: Add basic register clock controller | expand |
On 16/04/2023 21:46, David Yang wrote: > These clocks were provided in `include/linux/clk-provider.h`, but lacks DT > bindings. Add DT bindings for them. > > v2: split clock controller and its clocks I gave you several comments on v1 and this vague changelog entry suggests you ignored all of it. Implement feedback and respond to each one that you ack it or disagree with it. Best regards, Krzysztof
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> 于2023年4月17日周一 14:27写道: > > On 16/04/2023 21:46, David Yang wrote: > > These clocks were provided in `include/linux/clk-provider.h`, but lacks DT > > bindings. Add DT bindings for them. > > > > v2: split clock controller and its clocks > > I gave you several comments on v1 and this vague changelog entry > suggests you ignored all of it. > > Implement feedback and respond to each one that you ack it or disagree > with it. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > All issues have been addressed in v3 patch. I omitted details in changelog to reduce redundancy. If that is not the proper way to make response in dt maillist, please let me know. Responses for each comments in v1 and v2 have been sent against original email.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 02:16:28AM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> 于2023年4月17日周一 14:27写道: > > > > On 16/04/2023 21:46, David Yang wrote: > > > These clocks were provided in `include/linux/clk-provider.h`, but lacks DT > > > bindings. Add DT bindings for them. > > > > > > v2: split clock controller and its clocks > > > > I gave you several comments on v1 and this vague changelog entry > > suggests you ignored all of it. > > > > Implement feedback and respond to each one that you ack it or disagree > > with it. > > > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > > > All issues have been addressed in v3 patch. I omitted details in > changelog to reduce redundancy. If that is not the proper way to make > response in dt maillist, please let me know. > > Responses for each comments in v1 and v2 have been sent against original email. Go look at v1 replies. This series is a hard no. Rob