diff mbox series

[bpf,v7,03/13] bpf: sockmap, reschedule is now done through backlog

Message ID 20230502155159.305437-4-john.fastabend@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf sockmap fixes | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf, async
netdev/apply fail Patch does not apply to bpf
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR fail merge-conflict
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-36 success Logs for veristat

Commit Message

John Fastabend May 2, 2023, 3:51 p.m. UTC 
Now that the backlog manages the reschedule() logic correctly we can drop
the partial fix to reschedule from recvmsg hook.

Rescheduling on recvmsg hook was added to address a corner case where we
still had data in the backlog state but had nothing to kick it and
reschedule the backlog worker to run and finish copying data out of the
state. This had a couple limitations, first it required user space to
kick it introducing an unnecessary EBUSY and retry. Second it only
handled the ingress case and egress redirects would still be hung.

With the correct fix, pushing the reschedule logic down to where the
enomem error occurs we can drop this fix.

Fixes: bec217197b412 ("skmsg: Schedule psock work if the cached skb exists on the psock")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
---
 net/core/skmsg.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Jakub Sitnicki May 3, 2023, 9:49 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 08:51 AM -07, John Fastabend wrote:
> Now that the backlog manages the reschedule() logic correctly we can drop
> the partial fix to reschedule from recvmsg hook.
>
> Rescheduling on recvmsg hook was added to address a corner case where we
> still had data in the backlog state but had nothing to kick it and
> reschedule the backlog worker to run and finish copying data out of the
> state. This had a couple limitations, first it required user space to
> kick it introducing an unnecessary EBUSY and retry. Second it only
> handled the ingress case and egress redirects would still be hung.
>
> With the correct fix, pushing the reschedule logic down to where the
> enomem error occurs we can drop this fix.
>
> Fixes: bec217197b412 ("skmsg: Schedule psock work if the cached skb exists on the psock")
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index 198bed303c51..3f95c460c261 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -481,8 +481,6 @@  int sk_msg_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, struct msghdr *msg,
 		msg_rx = sk_psock_peek_msg(psock);
 	}
 out:
-	if (psock->work_state.skb && copied > 0)
-		schedule_delayed_work(&psock->work, 0);
 	return copied;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_msg_recvmsg);