Message ID | 1683196599-3730-1-git-send-email-quic_dikshita@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | venus: add support for 10 bit decoding | expand |
On 04/05/2023 11:36, Dikshita Agarwal wrote: > This series includes the changes to > - add V4L2_PIX_FMT_P010 as supported decoder format. > - consider dpb color format while calculating buffer > size for dpb buffers. > - update dpb and opb color format when bit depth > changes is detected, also update preferred color > format to P010 in this case. > > With this series, divided the previous version [1] into > multiple patches as suggested in review comments. > > [1] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=10376 > > Dikshita Agarwal (4): > venus: add support for V4L2_PIX_FMT_P010 color format > venus: update calculation for dpb buffers > venus: add handling of bit depth change from firmwar > venus: return P010 as preferred format for 10 bit decode > > drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_plat_bufs.h | 3 +++ > .../media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_plat_bufs_v6.c | 8 +++++++- > drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c | 16 +++++++++++++-- > 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > For future reference a series like this should: 1. Include a log of what changed between the last series and this 2. Describe which comments you addressed I generally try to say "Added newline to dts - Konrad" "Sent the series as a -v3 - Bryan" etc 3. Ideally provide a link to the previous series in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1682492417-20496-1-git-send-email-quic_dikshita@quicinc.com/ 4. Use versioning This set should be prefixed with "v2-0000-cover-letter" "v2-0001-add-support" etc "git format-patch mybase..targettip --cover-letter -v2" --- bod
On 04/05/2023 14:49, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 04/05/2023 11:36, Dikshita Agarwal wrote: >> This series includes the changes to >> - add V4L2_PIX_FMT_P010 as supported decoder format. >> - consider dpb color format while calculating buffer >> size for dpb buffers. >> - update dpb and opb color format when bit depth >> changes is detected, also update preferred color >> format to P010 in this case. >> >> With this series, divided the previous version [1] into >> multiple patches as suggested in review comments. >> >> [1] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=10376 >> >> Dikshita Agarwal (4): >> venus: add support for V4L2_PIX_FMT_P010 color format >> venus: update calculation for dpb buffers >> venus: add handling of bit depth change from firmwar >> venus: return P010 as preferred format for 10 bit decode >> >> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.c | 24 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_plat_bufs.h | 3 +++ >> .../media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_plat_bufs_v6.c | 8 +++++++- >> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c | 16 +++++++++++++-- >> 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > > For future reference a series like this should: > > 1. Include a log of what changed between the last series and this > 2. Describe which comments you addressed > I generally try to say > "Added newline to dts - Konrad" > "Sent the series as a -v3 - Bryan" > etc > 3. Ideally provide a link to the previous series in > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1682492417-20496-1-git-send-email-quic_dikshita@quicinc.com/ > 4. Use versioning > This set should be prefixed with "v2-0000-cover-letter" > "v2-0001-add-support" etc > > "git format-patch mybase..targettip --cover-letter -v2" > > --- > bod Doh I see you did most of that - just missed the V2. Please remember to version your subsequent series. "git format-patch -v2" --- bod
On 5/4/2023 7:21 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 04/05/2023 14:49, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >> On 04/05/2023 11:36, Dikshita Agarwal wrote: >>> This series includes the changes to >>> - add V4L2_PIX_FMT_P010 as supported decoder format. >>> - consider dpb color format while calculating buffer >>> size for dpb buffers. >>> - update dpb and opb color format when bit depth >>> changes is detected, also update preferred color >>> format to P010 in this case. >>> >>> With this series, divided the previous version [1] into >>> multiple patches as suggested in review comments. >>> >>> [1] >>> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=10376 >>> >>> Dikshita Agarwal (4): >>> venus: add support for V4L2_PIX_FMT_P010 color format >>> venus: update calculation for dpb buffers >>> venus: add handling of bit depth change from firmwar >>> venus: return P010 as preferred format for 10 bit decode >>> >>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.c | 24 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_plat_bufs.h | 3 +++ >>> .../media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_plat_bufs_v6.c | 8 +++++++- >>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c | 16 >>> +++++++++++++-- >>> 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >> >> For future reference a series like this should: >> >> 1. Include a log of what changed between the last series and this >> 2. Describe which comments you addressed >> I generally try to say >> "Added newline to dts - Konrad" >> "Sent the series as a -v3 - Bryan" >> etc >> 3. Ideally provide a link to the previous series in >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1682492417-20496-1-git-send-email-quic_dikshita@quicinc.com/ >> >> 4. Use versioning >> This set should be prefixed with "v2-0000-cover-letter" >> "v2-0001-add-support" etc >> >> "git format-patch mybase..targettip --cover-letter -v2" >> >> --- >> bod > > Doh I see you did most of that - just missed the V2. > > Please remember to version your subsequent series. "git format-patch -v2" Does this qualify for a version upgrade when a single patch is subsequently raised as series ? IMO, the link to previous single patch in cover letter and then starting the series (as v0) seems to provide the required info. > > --- > bod
On 04/05/2023 15:04, Vikash Garodia wrote: >> Doh I see you did most of that - just missed the V2. >> >> Please remember to version your subsequent series. "git format-patch -v2" > > Does this qualify for a version upgrade when a single patch is > subsequently raised as series ? IMO, the link > > to previous single patch in cover letter and then starting the series > (as v0) seems to provide the required info. Hmm. I'd say any series should have an increment in it to differentiate, with the exception being RESEND. Also you are splitting one patch into four. Looking through a bunch of email it might be not immediately obvious to understand that the new series and old series differ, which is IMO how the version numbers help others to know what's going on. --- bod