Message ID | 20230516124810.90494-1-laurent@vivier.eu (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 5/16/23 05:48, Laurent Vivier wrote: > The following changes since commit 7c18f2d663521f1b31b821a13358ce38075eaf7d: > > Merge tag 'for-upstream' of https://gitlab.com/bonzini/qemu into staging (2023-04-29 23:07:17 +0100) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://github.com/vivier/qemu.git tags/linux-user-for-8.1-pull-request > > for you to fetch changes up to c490496e85047d516b31f93ea0e14819e0ab5cf5: > > linux-user: fix getgroups/setgroups allocations (2023-05-16 12:48:09 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > linux-user pull request 20230512-v3 > > add open_tree(), move_mount() > add /proc/cpuinfo for riscv > fixes and cleanup The new test still fails. https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/4295127220#L4423 cpuinfo: /builds/qemu-project/qemu/tests/tcg/riscv64/cpuinfo.c:20: main: Assertion `strcmp(buffer, "isa\t\t: rv64imafdc_zicsr_zifencei\n") == 0' failed. r~
Le 16/05/2023 à 19:08, Richard Henderson a écrit : > On 5/16/23 05:48, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> The following changes since commit 7c18f2d663521f1b31b821a13358ce38075eaf7d: >> >> Merge tag 'for-upstream' of https://gitlab.com/bonzini/qemu into staging (2023-04-29 23:07:17 >> +0100) >> >> are available in the Git repository at: >> >> https://github.com/vivier/qemu.git tags/linux-user-for-8.1-pull-request >> >> for you to fetch changes up to c490496e85047d516b31f93ea0e14819e0ab5cf5: >> >> linux-user: fix getgroups/setgroups allocations (2023-05-16 12:48:09 +0200) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> linux-user pull request 20230512-v3 >> >> add open_tree(), move_mount() >> add /proc/cpuinfo for riscv >> fixes and cleanup > > The new test still fails. > > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/4295127220#L4423 > > cpuinfo: /builds/qemu-project/qemu/tests/tcg/riscv64/cpuinfo.c:20: main: Assertion `strcmp(buffer, > "isa\t\t: rv64imafdc_zicsr_zifencei\n") == 0' failed. > I'm going to remove the test as it's not clear why it fails... Thanks, Laurent