Message ID | 20230518153733.195306-1-hdegoede@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | media: atomisp: Add support for v4l2-async sensor registration | expand |
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 6:37 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm quite happy to present this patch series which makes it possible > to use v4l2-async sensor registration together with the atomisp code :) > > This has been tested with both the gc0310 and the ov2680 sensor drivers. > > For now it also is still possible to use the old atomisp_gmin_platform > based sensor drivers. This is mainly intended for testing while moving > other sensor drivers over to runtime-pm + v4l2-async. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> for non-commented ones or in case you resolve remarks my way. Definitely this does not apply to patch 9/9 which is WIP and requires more review, I'm still planning to go through it (not done yet).
Hi, On 5/18/23 18:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 6:37 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I'm quite happy to present this patch series which makes it possible >> to use v4l2-async sensor registration together with the atomisp code :) >> >> This has been tested with both the gc0310 and the ov2680 sensor drivers. >> >> For now it also is still possible to use the old atomisp_gmin_platform >> based sensor drivers. This is mainly intended for testing while moving >> other sensor drivers over to runtime-pm + v4l2-async. > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> > for non-commented ones or in case you resolve remarks my way. > > Definitely this does not apply to patch 9/9 which is WIP and requires > more review, I'm still planning to go through it (not done yet). Ugh, my bad I forgot to change the commit message of 9/9 from my pov other then the commit message 9/9 is ready for merging I have tested 9/9 with both the gc0310 and ov2680 drivers with all mixes of 0 / 1 / both sensors using async (and the others "classic" atomisp) enumeration and that all works well. Regards, Hans