Message ID | 1341582904-31896-1-git-send-email-saugata.das@stericsson.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Saugata, Could check the your worked base? It can't be merged. And there are some comments below. Friday, July 06, 2012, Saugata Das <saugata.das@stericsson.com> wrote: > From: Saugata Das <saugata.das@linaro.org> > > In 512B disable emulation patch, a check is done to ensure that size > of the data is multiple of 4KB within mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq. However, > the check is done with brq->data.blocks, which is not initialized at > the point of check. This is now changed to blk_rq_sectors. > > In addition, when retrying read transfers, the current code retries > with single block. This has been changed to 8 blocks if disable > emulation is enabled. > > For hosts which are not capable to handle transfer of multiple of 4KB, > a check has been added in mmc_read_ext_csd. A check has been added for > reliable write with EN_REL_WR=0, which is not allowed. > > Signed-off-by: Saugata Das <saugata.das@linaro.org> > > Changes in v2 : > - Added check in mmc_read_ext_csd It's not good way to add version history here. > --- > drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ > drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 9 +++++++-- > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > index d628c5d..69b7b03 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > @@ -1114,7 +1114,10 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq, > bool do_rel_wr = ((req->cmd_flags & REQ_FUA) || > (req->cmd_flags & REQ_META)) && > (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE) && > - (md->flags & MMC_BLK_REL_WR); > + (md->flags & MMC_BLK_REL_WR) && > + ((card->ext_csd.data_sector_size == 512) || > + ((card->ext_csd.data_sector_size == 4096) && > + (card->ext_csd.rel_param & EXT_CSD_WR_REL_PARAM_EN))); > > memset(brq, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_blk_request)); > brq->mrq.cmd = &brq->cmd; > @@ -1145,7 +1148,9 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq, > * sectors can be read successfully. > */ > if (disable_multi) > - brq->data.blocks = 1; > + brq->data.blocks = > + (card->ext_csd.data_sector_size == 4096) ? > + 8 : 1; > > /* Some controllers can't do multiblock reads due to hw bugs */ > if (card->host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_MULTI_READ && > @@ -1296,10 +1301,11 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc) > * When 4KB native sector is enabled, only 8 blocks > * multiple read or write is allowed > */ > - if ((brq->data.blocks & 0x07) && > + if ((blk_rq_sectors(req) & 0x07) && > (card->ext_csd.data_sector_size == 4096)) { > - pr_err("%s: Transfer size is not 4KB sector size aligned\n", > - req->rq_disk->disk_name); > + pr_err("%s: Transfer size [%d] is not 4KB sector size aligned\n", > + req->rq_disk->disk_name, > + blk_rq_sectors(req)); rqc seems be proper instead of req. In do-while loop for error-handling, req can be replaced with previous request. Also, it would be better check the alignment in outer loop. How about move to out of loop? Best regards, Seungwon Jeon > goto cmd_abort; > } > mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq->mqrq_cur, card, 0, mq); > @@ -1364,7 +1370,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc) > /* Fall through */ > } > case MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR: > - if (brq->data.blocks > 1) { > + if (brq->data.blocks > > + (card->ext_csd.data_sector_size >> 9)) { > /* Redo read one sector at a time */ > pr_warning("%s: retrying using single block read\n", > req->rq_disk->disk_name); > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c > index 28fbd77..fb68f17 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c > @@ -503,9 +503,14 @@ static int mmc_read_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *ext_csd) > ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CACHE_SIZE + 2] << 16 | > ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CACHE_SIZE + 3] << 24; > > - if (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_DATA_SECTOR_SIZE] == 1) > + if (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_DATA_SECTOR_SIZE] == 1) { > + if ((card->host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_MULTI_READ) || > + (card->host->max_blk_count & 0x07)) { > + err = -EINVAL; > + goto out; > + } > card->ext_csd.data_sector_size = 4096; > - else > + } else > card->ext_csd.data_sector_size = 512; > > if ((ext_csd[EXT_CSD_DATA_TAG_SUPPORT] & 1) && > -- > 1.7.4.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c index d628c5d..69b7b03 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c @@ -1114,7 +1114,10 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq, bool do_rel_wr = ((req->cmd_flags & REQ_FUA) || (req->cmd_flags & REQ_META)) && (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE) && - (md->flags & MMC_BLK_REL_WR); + (md->flags & MMC_BLK_REL_WR) && + ((card->ext_csd.data_sector_size == 512) || + ((card->ext_csd.data_sector_size == 4096) && + (card->ext_csd.rel_param & EXT_CSD_WR_REL_PARAM_EN))); memset(brq, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_blk_request)); brq->mrq.cmd = &brq->cmd; @@ -1145,7 +1148,9 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq, * sectors can be read successfully. */ if (disable_multi) - brq->data.blocks = 1; + brq->data.blocks = + (card->ext_csd.data_sector_size == 4096) ? + 8 : 1; /* Some controllers can't do multiblock reads due to hw bugs */ if (card->host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_MULTI_READ && @@ -1296,10 +1301,11 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc) * When 4KB native sector is enabled, only 8 blocks * multiple read or write is allowed */ - if ((brq->data.blocks & 0x07) && + if ((blk_rq_sectors(req) & 0x07) && (card->ext_csd.data_sector_size == 4096)) { - pr_err("%s: Transfer size is not 4KB sector size aligned\n", - req->rq_disk->disk_name); + pr_err("%s: Transfer size [%d] is not 4KB sector size aligned\n", + req->rq_disk->disk_name, + blk_rq_sectors(req)); goto cmd_abort; } mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq->mqrq_cur, card, 0, mq); @@ -1364,7 +1370,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc) /* Fall through */ } case MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR: - if (brq->data.blocks > 1) { + if (brq->data.blocks > + (card->ext_csd.data_sector_size >> 9)) { /* Redo read one sector at a time */ pr_warning("%s: retrying using single block read\n", req->rq_disk->disk_name); diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c index 28fbd77..fb68f17 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c @@ -503,9 +503,14 @@ static int mmc_read_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card, u8 *ext_csd) ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CACHE_SIZE + 2] << 16 | ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CACHE_SIZE + 3] << 24; - if (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_DATA_SECTOR_SIZE] == 1) + if (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_DATA_SECTOR_SIZE] == 1) { + if ((card->host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_MULTI_READ) || + (card->host->max_blk_count & 0x07)) { + err = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } card->ext_csd.data_sector_size = 4096; - else + } else card->ext_csd.data_sector_size = 512; if ((ext_csd[EXT_CSD_DATA_TAG_SUPPORT] & 1) &&