Message ID | 1e2924e9a604f781ad446ba8e2d789583e377837.1684408079.git.fdmanana@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | btrfs/213: avoid occasional failure due to already finished balance | expand |
On 18/5/23 19:08, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > btrfs/213 writes data, in 1M extents, for 4 seconds into a file, then > triggers a balance and then after 2 seconds it tries to cancel the > balance operation. More often than not, this works because the balance > is still running after 2 seconds. However it also fails sporadically > because balance has finished in less than 2 seconds, which is plausible > since data and metadata are cached or other factors such as virtualized > environment. When that's the case, it fails like this: > > $ ./check btrfs/213 > FSTYP -- btrfs > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.4.0-rc1-btrfs-next-131+ #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 11 11:26:19 WEST 2023 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1 > > btrfs/213 51s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/213.out.bad) > --- tests/btrfs/213.out 2020-06-10 19:29:03.822519250 +0100 > +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/213.out.bad 2023-05-17 15:39:32.653727223 +0100 > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ > QA output created by 213 > +ERROR: balance cancel on '/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1' failed: Not in progress > Silence is golden > ... > (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/btrfs/213.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/213.out.bad' to see the entire diff) > Ran: btrfs/213 > Failures: btrfs/213 > Failed 1 of 1 tests > > To make it much less likely that balance has already finished before we > try to cancel it, unmount and mount again the filesystem before starting > balance, to clear cached metadata and data, and also double the time we > spend writing 1M data extents. Also ignore when the balance failed because > it was already finished when we tried to cancel it. > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > --- > tests/btrfs/213 | 13 ++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/213 b/tests/btrfs/213 > index 8a10355c..cca0b3cc 100755 > --- a/tests/btrfs/213 > +++ b/tests/btrfs/213 > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ _require_xfs_io_command pwrite -D > _scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full > _scratch_mount > > -runtime=4 > +runtime=8 > > # Create enough IO so that we need around $runtime seconds to relocate it. > # > @@ -39,11 +39,18 @@ sleep $runtime > kill $write_pid > wait $write_pid > > +# Unmount and mount again the fs to clear any cached data and metadata, so that > +# it's less likely balance has already finished when we try to cancel it below. > +_scratch_cycle_mount > + > # Now balance should take at least $runtime seconds, we can cancel it at > # $runtime/2 to ensure a success cancel. > _run_btrfs_balance_start -d --bg "$SCRATCH_MNT" > -sleep $(($runtime / 2)) > -$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG balance cancel "$SCRATCH_MNT" > +sleep $(($runtime / 4)) > +# It's possible that balance has already completed. It's unlikely but often > +# it may happen due to virtualization, caching and other factors, so ignore > +# any error about no balance currently running. > +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG balance cancel "$SCRATCH_MNT" 2>&1 | grep -iv 'not in progress' Cancel is an important step in this test case. Why not call _notrun() if the test case fails to make sure the balance is still in progress? This way, it provides another opportunity to fix. Thanks, Anand > > # Now check if we can finish relocating metadata, which should finish very > # quickly.
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 6:05 AM Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 18/5/23 19:08, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > > > btrfs/213 writes data, in 1M extents, for 4 seconds into a file, then > > triggers a balance and then after 2 seconds it tries to cancel the > > balance operation. More often than not, this works because the balance > > is still running after 2 seconds. However it also fails sporadically > > because balance has finished in less than 2 seconds, which is plausible > > since data and metadata are cached or other factors such as virtualized > > environment. When that's the case, it fails like this: > > > > $ ./check btrfs/213 > > FSTYP -- btrfs > > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.4.0-rc1-btrfs-next-131+ #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 11 11:26:19 WEST 2023 > > MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc > > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1 > > > > btrfs/213 51s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/213.out.bad) > > --- tests/btrfs/213.out 2020-06-10 19:29:03.822519250 +0100 > > +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/213.out.bad 2023-05-17 15:39:32.653727223 +0100 > > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ > > QA output created by 213 > > +ERROR: balance cancel on '/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1' failed: Not in progress > > Silence is golden > > ... > > (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/btrfs/213.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/213.out.bad' to see the entire diff) > > Ran: btrfs/213 > > Failures: btrfs/213 > > Failed 1 of 1 tests > > > > To make it much less likely that balance has already finished before we > > try to cancel it, unmount and mount again the filesystem before starting > > balance, to clear cached metadata and data, and also double the time we > > spend writing 1M data extents. Also ignore when the balance failed because > > it was already finished when we tried to cancel it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > --- > > tests/btrfs/213 | 13 ++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/213 b/tests/btrfs/213 > > index 8a10355c..cca0b3cc 100755 > > --- a/tests/btrfs/213 > > +++ b/tests/btrfs/213 > > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ _require_xfs_io_command pwrite -D > > _scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full > > _scratch_mount > > > > -runtime=4 > > +runtime=8 > > > > # Create enough IO so that we need around $runtime seconds to relocate it. > > # > > @@ -39,11 +39,18 @@ sleep $runtime > > kill $write_pid > > wait $write_pid > > > > +# Unmount and mount again the fs to clear any cached data and metadata, so that > > +# it's less likely balance has already finished when we try to cancel it below. > > +_scratch_cycle_mount > > + > > # Now balance should take at least $runtime seconds, we can cancel it at > > # $runtime/2 to ensure a success cancel. > > _run_btrfs_balance_start -d --bg "$SCRATCH_MNT" > > > > -sleep $(($runtime / 2)) > > -$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG balance cancel "$SCRATCH_MNT" > > +sleep $(($runtime / 4)) > > +# It's possible that balance has already completed. It's unlikely but often > > +# it may happen due to virtualization, caching and other factors, so ignore > > +# any error about no balance currently running. > > +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG balance cancel "$SCRATCH_MNT" 2>&1 | grep -iv 'not in progress' > > Cancel is an important step in this test case. > Why not call _notrun() if the test case fails to make sure > the balance is still in progress? This way, it provides > another opportunity to fix. Sounds reasonable. Sent a v2 with that. Thanks. > > Thanks, Anand > > > > > # Now check if we can finish relocating metadata, which should finish very > > # quickly. >
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/213 b/tests/btrfs/213 index 8a10355c..cca0b3cc 100755 --- a/tests/btrfs/213 +++ b/tests/btrfs/213 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ _require_xfs_io_command pwrite -D _scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full _scratch_mount -runtime=4 +runtime=8 # Create enough IO so that we need around $runtime seconds to relocate it. # @@ -39,11 +39,18 @@ sleep $runtime kill $write_pid wait $write_pid +# Unmount and mount again the fs to clear any cached data and metadata, so that +# it's less likely balance has already finished when we try to cancel it below. +_scratch_cycle_mount + # Now balance should take at least $runtime seconds, we can cancel it at # $runtime/2 to ensure a success cancel. _run_btrfs_balance_start -d --bg "$SCRATCH_MNT" -sleep $(($runtime / 2)) -$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG balance cancel "$SCRATCH_MNT" +sleep $(($runtime / 4)) +# It's possible that balance has already completed. It's unlikely but often +# it may happen due to virtualization, caching and other factors, so ignore +# any error about no balance currently running. +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG balance cancel "$SCRATCH_MNT" 2>&1 | grep -iv 'not in progress' # Now check if we can finish relocating metadata, which should finish very # quickly.