Message ID | 20230518113328.1952135-4-idosch@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | Add layer 2 miss indication and filtering | expand |
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 02:33:26PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > Adjust drivers that support the 'FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META' key to reject > filters that try to match on the newly added layer 2 miss option. Add an > extack message to clearly communicate the failure reason to user space. Hi Ido, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META is also used in the following. Perhaps they don't need updating. But perhaps it is worth mentioning why. * drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c * drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/conntrack.c > > Example: > > # tc filter add dev swp1 egress pref 1 proto all flower skip_sw l2_miss true action drop > Error: mlxsw_spectrum: Can't match on "l2_miss". > We have an error talking to the kernel > > Acked-by: Elad Nachman <enachman@marvell.com> > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> ...
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:33:00PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 02:33:26PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > Adjust drivers that support the 'FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META' key to reject > > filters that try to match on the newly added layer 2 miss option. Add an > > extack message to clearly communicate the failure reason to user space. > > Hi Ido, > > FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META is also used in the following. > Perhaps they don't need updating. But perhaps it is worth mentioning why. Good point. > > * drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c This driver does not seem to do anything with this key. TBH, I'm not sure what is the purpose of this hunk: if (flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META)) { struct flow_match_meta match; flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match); } else { return -EOPNOTSUPP; } Felix, can you comment? Original patch: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230518113328.1952135-4-idosch@nvidia.com/ > * drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/conntrack.c My understanding is that this code is for netfilter offload (not tc) which does not use the new bit. Adding a check would therefore be dead code. I don't mind adding a check or mentioning in the commit message why I didn't add one. Let me know what you prefer. Thanks
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 05:10:58PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:33:00PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 02:33:26PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > > Adjust drivers that support the 'FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META' key to reject > > > filters that try to match on the newly added layer 2 miss option. Add an > > > extack message to clearly communicate the failure reason to user space. > > > > Hi Ido, > > > > FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META is also used in the following. > > Perhaps they don't need updating. But perhaps it is worth mentioning why. > > Good point. > > > > > * drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c > > This driver does not seem to do anything with this key. TBH, I'm not > sure what is the purpose of this hunk: > > if (flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META)) { > struct flow_match_meta match; > > flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match); > } else { > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > } > > Felix, can you comment? > Original patch: > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230518113328.1952135-4-idosch@nvidia.com/ FWIIW, I agree with your analysis here. > > * drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/conntrack.c > > My understanding is that this code is for netfilter offload (not tc) > which does not use the new bit. Adding a check would therefore be dead > code. I don't mind adding a check or mentioning in the commit message > why I didn't add one. Let me know what you prefer. Let's go with a comment in the commit message. Thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c index 91a478b75cbf..3e20e71b0f81 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c @@ -148,6 +148,12 @@ static int prestera_flower_parse_meta(struct prestera_acl_rule *rule, __be16 key, mask; flow_rule_match_meta(f_rule, &match); + + if (match.mask->l2_miss) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\""); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + if (match.mask->ingress_ifindex != 0xFFFFFFFF) { NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Unsupported ingress ifindex mask"); diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c index 728b82ce4031..516653568330 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c @@ -2586,6 +2586,12 @@ static int mlx5e_flower_parse_meta(struct net_device *filter_dev, return 0; flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match); + + if (match.mask->l2_miss) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\""); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + if (!match.mask->ingress_ifindex) return 0; diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c index 594cdcb90b3d..6fec9223250b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c @@ -294,6 +294,12 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_flower_parse_meta(struct mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_info *rulei, return 0; flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match); + + if (match.mask->l2_miss) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\""); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + if (match.mask->ingress_ifindex != 0xFFFFFFFF) { NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Unsupported ingress ifindex mask"); return -EINVAL; diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c index ee052404eb55..e0916afcddfb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c @@ -592,6 +592,16 @@ ocelot_flower_parse_key(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, bool ingress, return -EOPNOTSUPP; } + if (flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META)) { + struct flow_match_meta match; + + flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match); + if (match.mask->l2_miss) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\""); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + } + /* For VCAP ES0 (egress rewriter) we can match on the ingress port */ if (!ingress) { ret = ocelot_flower_parse_indev(ocelot, port, f, filter);