Message ID | 20230511123213.722912-1-cgzones@googlemail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Paul Moore |
Headers | show |
Series | selinux: deprecated fs ocon | expand |
On May 11, 2023 =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20G=C3=B6ttsche?= <cgzones@googlemail.com> wrote: > > The object context type `fs`, not to be confused with the well used > object context type `fscon`, was introduced in the initial git commit > 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") but never actually used since. > > The paper "A Security Policy Configuration for the Security-Enhanced > Linux" [1] mentions it under `7.2 File System Contexts` but also states: > > Currently, this configuration is unused. > > The policy statement defining such object contexts is `fscon`, e.g.: > > fscon 2 3 gen_context(system_u:object_r:conA_t,s0) gen_context(system_u:object_r:conB_t,s0) > > It is not documented at selinuxproject.org or in the SELinux notebook > and not supported by the Reference Policy buildsystem - the statement is > not properly sorted - and thus not used in the Reference or Fedora > Policy. > > Print a warning message at policy load for each such object context: > > SELinux: void and deprecated fs ocon 02:03 > > This topic was initially highlighted by Nicolas Iooss [2]. > > [1]: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/29/2002815735/-1/-1/0/SELINUX-SECURITY-POLICY-CONFIGURATION-REPORT.PDF > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/CAJfZ7=mP2eJaq2BfO3y0VnwUJaY2cS2p=HZMN71z1pKjzaT0Eg@mail.gmail.com/ > > Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> > --- > security/selinux/ss/policydb.c | 4 ++++ > security/selinux/ss/policydb.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Thanks, this is a nice catch, although some minor suggestions below ... > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > index 97c0074f9312..31b08b34c722 100644 > --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > @@ -2257,6 +2257,10 @@ static int ocontext_read(struct policydb *p, const struct policydb_compat_info * > if (rc) > goto out; > > + if (i == OCON_FS) > + pr_warn("SELinux: void and deprecated fs ocon %s\n", > + c->u.name); Instead of having to check if 'i == OCON_FS', why not simply put the pr_warn() call up in the OCON_FS case block on line ~2249 and let it continue to fallthrough to the OCON_NETIF block? > rc = context_read_and_validate(&c->context[0], p, fp); > if (rc) > goto out; > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h > index ffc4e7bad205..39cd6222e1a8 100644 > --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h > @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ struct genfs { > > /* object context array indices */ > #define OCON_ISID 0 /* initial SIDs */ > -#define OCON_FS 1 /* unlabeled file systems */ > +#define OCON_FS 1 /* unlabeled file systems (deprecated in 6.5) */ Since you are likely re-spinning this (see above), I would just leave it as "(deprecated)"; those that want to know where it was deprecated can always check the git log/tags. > #define OCON_PORT 2 /* TCP and UDP port numbers */ > #define OCON_NETIF 3 /* network interfaces */ > #define OCON_NODE 4 /* nodes */ > -- > 2.40.1 -- paul-moore.com
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:56 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote: > On May 11, 2023 =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20G=C3=B6ttsche?= <cgzones@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > The object context type `fs`, not to be confused with the well used > > object context type `fscon`, was introduced in the initial git commit > > 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") but never actually used since. > > > > The paper "A Security Policy Configuration for the Security-Enhanced > > Linux" [1] mentions it under `7.2 File System Contexts` but also states: > > > > Currently, this configuration is unused. > > > > The policy statement defining such object contexts is `fscon`, e.g.: > > > > fscon 2 3 gen_context(system_u:object_r:conA_t,s0) gen_context(system_u:object_r:conB_t,s0) > > > > It is not documented at selinuxproject.org or in the SELinux notebook > > and not supported by the Reference Policy buildsystem - the statement is > > not properly sorted - and thus not used in the Reference or Fedora > > Policy. > > > > Print a warning message at policy load for each such object context: > > > > SELinux: void and deprecated fs ocon 02:03 > > > > This topic was initially highlighted by Nicolas Iooss [2]. > > > > [1]: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/29/2002815735/-1/-1/0/SELINUX-SECURITY-POLICY-CONFIGURATION-REPORT.PDF > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/CAJfZ7=mP2eJaq2BfO3y0VnwUJaY2cS2p=HZMN71z1pKjzaT0Eg@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> > > --- > > security/selinux/ss/policydb.c | 4 ++++ > > security/selinux/ss/policydb.h | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Thanks, this is a nice catch, although some minor suggestions below ... > > > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > > index 97c0074f9312..31b08b34c722 100644 > > --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > > @@ -2257,6 +2257,10 @@ static int ocontext_read(struct policydb *p, const struct policydb_compat_info * > > if (rc) > > goto out; > > > > + if (i == OCON_FS) > > + pr_warn("SELinux: void and deprecated fs ocon %s\n", > > + c->u.name); > > Instead of having to check if 'i == OCON_FS', why not simply put the > pr_warn() call up in the OCON_FS case block on line ~2249 and let it > continue to fallthrough to the OCON_NETIF block? Bah, nevermind, you need to leave it here because of the 'c->u.name' in the pr_warn(). If you're okay with me adjusting the deprecation comment (below) during the merge I'll can merge this now ... ? > > rc = context_read_and_validate(&c->context[0], p, fp); > > if (rc) > > goto out; > > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h > > index ffc4e7bad205..39cd6222e1a8 100644 > > --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h > > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h > > @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ struct genfs { > > > > /* object context array indices */ > > #define OCON_ISID 0 /* initial SIDs */ > > -#define OCON_FS 1 /* unlabeled file systems */ > > +#define OCON_FS 1 /* unlabeled file systems (deprecated in 6.5) */ > > Since you are likely re-spinning this (see above), I would just leave > it as "(deprecated)"; those that want to know where it was deprecated > can always check the git log/tags. > > > #define OCON_PORT 2 /* TCP and UDP port numbers */ > > #define OCON_NETIF 3 /* network interfaces */ > > #define OCON_NODE 4 /* nodes */ > > -- > > 2.40.1
On Thu, 18 May 2023 at 22:18, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:56 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote: > > On May 11, 2023 =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20G=C3=B6ttsche?= <cgzones@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > The object context type `fs`, not to be confused with the well used > > > object context type `fscon`, was introduced in the initial git commit > > > 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") but never actually used since. > > > > > > The paper "A Security Policy Configuration for the Security-Enhanced > > > Linux" [1] mentions it under `7.2 File System Contexts` but also states: > > > > > > Currently, this configuration is unused. > > > > > > The policy statement defining such object contexts is `fscon`, e.g.: > > > > > > fscon 2 3 gen_context(system_u:object_r:conA_t,s0) gen_context(system_u:object_r:conB_t,s0) > > > > > > It is not documented at selinuxproject.org or in the SELinux notebook > > > and not supported by the Reference Policy buildsystem - the statement is > > > not properly sorted - and thus not used in the Reference or Fedora > > > Policy. > > > > > > Print a warning message at policy load for each such object context: > > > > > > SELinux: void and deprecated fs ocon 02:03 > > > > > > This topic was initially highlighted by Nicolas Iooss [2]. > > > > > > [1]: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/29/2002815735/-1/-1/0/SELINUX-SECURITY-POLICY-CONFIGURATION-REPORT.PDF > > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/CAJfZ7=mP2eJaq2BfO3y0VnwUJaY2cS2p=HZMN71z1pKjzaT0Eg@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> > > > --- > > > security/selinux/ss/policydb.c | 4 ++++ > > > security/selinux/ss/policydb.h | 2 +- > > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Thanks, this is a nice catch, although some minor suggestions below ... > > > > > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > > > index 97c0074f9312..31b08b34c722 100644 > > > --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > > > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > > > @@ -2257,6 +2257,10 @@ static int ocontext_read(struct policydb *p, const struct policydb_compat_info * > > > if (rc) > > > goto out; > > > > > > + if (i == OCON_FS) > > > + pr_warn("SELinux: void and deprecated fs ocon %s\n", > > > + c->u.name); > > > > Instead of having to check if 'i == OCON_FS', why not simply put the > > pr_warn() call up in the OCON_FS case block on line ~2249 and let it > > continue to fallthrough to the OCON_NETIF block? > > Bah, nevermind, you need to leave it here because of the 'c->u.name' > in the pr_warn(). If you're okay with me adjusting the deprecation > comment (below) during the merge I'll can merge this now ... ? Yes, please feel free to adjust the inline comment. > > > > rc = context_read_and_validate(&c->context[0], p, fp); > > > if (rc) > > > goto out; > > > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h > > > index ffc4e7bad205..39cd6222e1a8 100644 > > > --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h > > > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h > > > @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ struct genfs { > > > > > > /* object context array indices */ > > > #define OCON_ISID 0 /* initial SIDs */ > > > -#define OCON_FS 1 /* unlabeled file systems */ > > > +#define OCON_FS 1 /* unlabeled file systems (deprecated in 6.5) */ > > > > Since you are likely re-spinning this (see above), I would just leave > > it as "(deprecated)"; those that want to know where it was deprecated > > can always check the git log/tags. > > > > > #define OCON_PORT 2 /* TCP and UDP port numbers */ > > > #define OCON_NETIF 3 /* network interfaces */ > > > #define OCON_NODE 4 /* nodes */ > > > -- > > > 2.40.1 > > -- > paul-moore.com
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 2:25 PM Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 18 May 2023 at 22:18, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:56 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote: > > > On May 11, 2023 =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20G=C3=B6ttsche?= <cgzones@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > The object context type `fs`, not to be confused with the well used > > > > object context type `fscon`, was introduced in the initial git commit > > > > 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") but never actually used since. > > > > > > > > The paper "A Security Policy Configuration for the Security-Enhanced > > > > Linux" [1] mentions it under `7.2 File System Contexts` but also states: > > > > > > > > Currently, this configuration is unused. > > > > > > > > The policy statement defining such object contexts is `fscon`, e.g.: > > > > > > > > fscon 2 3 gen_context(system_u:object_r:conA_t,s0) gen_context(system_u:object_r:conB_t,s0) > > > > > > > > It is not documented at selinuxproject.org or in the SELinux notebook > > > > and not supported by the Reference Policy buildsystem - the statement is > > > > not properly sorted - and thus not used in the Reference or Fedora > > > > Policy. > > > > > > > > Print a warning message at policy load for each such object context: > > > > > > > > SELinux: void and deprecated fs ocon 02:03 > > > > > > > > This topic was initially highlighted by Nicolas Iooss [2]. > > > > > > > > [1]: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/29/2002815735/-1/-1/0/SELINUX-SECURITY-POLICY-CONFIGURATION-REPORT.PDF > > > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/CAJfZ7=mP2eJaq2BfO3y0VnwUJaY2cS2p=HZMN71z1pKjzaT0Eg@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> > > > > --- > > > > security/selinux/ss/policydb.c | 4 ++++ > > > > security/selinux/ss/policydb.h | 2 +- > > > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > Thanks, this is a nice catch, although some minor suggestions below ... > > > > > > > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > > > > index 97c0074f9312..31b08b34c722 100644 > > > > --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > > > > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c > > > > @@ -2257,6 +2257,10 @@ static int ocontext_read(struct policydb *p, const struct policydb_compat_info * > > > > if (rc) > > > > goto out; > > > > > > > > + if (i == OCON_FS) > > > > + pr_warn("SELinux: void and deprecated fs ocon %s\n", > > > > + c->u.name); > > > > > > Instead of having to check if 'i == OCON_FS', why not simply put the > > > pr_warn() call up in the OCON_FS case block on line ~2249 and let it > > > continue to fallthrough to the OCON_NETIF block? > > > > Bah, nevermind, you need to leave it here because of the 'c->u.name' > > in the pr_warn(). If you're okay with me adjusting the deprecation > > comment (below) during the merge I'll can merge this now ... ? > > Yes, please feel free to adjust the inline comment. Okay, done and merged into selinux/next, thanks.
diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c index 97c0074f9312..31b08b34c722 100644 --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c @@ -2257,6 +2257,10 @@ static int ocontext_read(struct policydb *p, const struct policydb_compat_info * if (rc) goto out; + if (i == OCON_FS) + pr_warn("SELinux: void and deprecated fs ocon %s\n", + c->u.name); + rc = context_read_and_validate(&c->context[0], p, fp); if (rc) goto out; diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h index ffc4e7bad205..39cd6222e1a8 100644 --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ struct genfs { /* object context array indices */ #define OCON_ISID 0 /* initial SIDs */ -#define OCON_FS 1 /* unlabeled file systems */ +#define OCON_FS 1 /* unlabeled file systems (deprecated in 6.5) */ #define OCON_PORT 2 /* TCP and UDP port numbers */ #define OCON_NETIF 3 /* network interfaces */ #define OCON_NODE 4 /* nodes */
The object context type `fs`, not to be confused with the well used object context type `fscon`, was introduced in the initial git commit 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") but never actually used since. The paper "A Security Policy Configuration for the Security-Enhanced Linux" [1] mentions it under `7.2 File System Contexts` but also states: Currently, this configuration is unused. The policy statement defining such object contexts is `fscon`, e.g.: fscon 2 3 gen_context(system_u:object_r:conA_t,s0) gen_context(system_u:object_r:conB_t,s0) It is not documented at selinuxproject.org or in the SELinux notebook and not supported by the Reference Policy buildsystem - the statement is not properly sorted - and thus not used in the Reference or Fedora Policy. Print a warning message at policy load for each such object context: SELinux: void and deprecated fs ocon 02:03 This topic was initially highlighted by Nicolas Iooss [2]. [1]: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/29/2002815735/-1/-1/0/SELINUX-SECURITY-POLICY-CONFIGURATION-REPORT.PDF [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/CAJfZ7=mP2eJaq2BfO3y0VnwUJaY2cS2p=HZMN71z1pKjzaT0Eg@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> --- security/selinux/ss/policydb.c | 4 ++++ security/selinux/ss/policydb.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)