| Message ID | e35cf1de35fdb0a236064ff645ae4734d32bacd4.1684949845.git.falcon@tinylab.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support | expand |
On 2023-05-25 02:03:32+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > rv32 uses the generic include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h and it has no > __NR_gettimeofday and __NR_clock_gettime after kernel commit d4c08b9776b3 > ("riscv: Use latest system call ABI"), use __NR_clock_gettime64 instead. > > This code is based on src/time/gettimeofday.c of musl and > sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_gettime.c of glibc. > > Both __NR_clock_gettime and __NR_clock_gettime64 are added for > sys_gettimeofday() for they share most of the code. > > Notes: > > * Both tv and tz are not directly passed to kernel clock_gettime* > syscalls, so, it isn't able to check the pointer automatically with the > get_user/put_user helpers just like kernel gettimeofday syscall does. > instead, we emulate (but not completely) such checks in our new > __NR_clock_gettime* branch of nolibc. > > * kernel clock_gettime* syscalls can not get tz info, just like musl and > glibc do, we set tz to zero to avoid a random number. > > Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> > --- > tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > index 2642b380c6aa..ad38cc3856be 100644 > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > > #include "arch.h" > #include "errno.h" > +#include "string.h" > #include "types.h" > > > @@ -51,6 +52,11 @@ > * should not be placed here. > */ > > +/* > + * This is the first address past the end of the text segment (the program code). > + */ > + > +extern char etext; > > /* > * int brk(void *addr); > @@ -554,7 +560,47 @@ long getpagesize(void) > static __attribute__((unused)) > int sys_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz) > { > +#ifdef __NR_gettimeofday > return my_syscall2(__NR_gettimeofday, tv, tz); > +#elif defined(__NR_clock_gettime) || defined(__NR_clock_gettime64) > +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime > + struct timespec ts; > +#else > + struct timespec64 ts; > +#define __NR_clock_gettime __NR_clock_gettime64 > +#endif > + int ret; > + > + /* make sure tv pointer is at least after code segment */ > + if (tv != NULL && (char *)tv <= &etext) > + return -EFAULT; To me the weird etext comparisions don't seem to be worth it, to be honest. > + > + /* set tz to zero to avoid random number */ > + if (tz != NULL) { > + if ((char *)tz > &etext) > + memset(tz, 0, sizeof(struct timezone)); > + else > + return -EFAULT; > + } > + > + if (tv == NULL) > + return 0; > + > + ret = my_syscall2(__NR_clock_gettime, CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + tv->tv_sec = (time_t) ts.tv_sec; > +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime64 Nitpick: While this ifdef works and is correct its logic is a bit indirect. If it is copied to some other function in the future it may be incorrect there. Without the #ifdef the compiler should still be able to optimize the code away. > + if (tv->tv_sec != ts.tv_sec) > + return -EOVERFLOW; > +#endif > + > + tv->tv_usec = ts.tv_nsec / 1000; > + return 0; > +#else > +#error None of __NR_gettimeofday, __NR_clock_gettime and __NR_clock_gettime64 defined, cannot implement sys_gettimeofday() > +#endif > } > > static __attribute__((unused)) > -- > 2.25.1 >
Hi, Thomas, Willy > On 2023-05-25 02:03:32+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > > rv32 uses the generic include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h and it has no > > __NR_gettimeofday and __NR_clock_gettime after kernel commit d4c08b9776b3 > > ("riscv: Use latest system call ABI"), use __NR_clock_gettime64 instead. > > > > This code is based on src/time/gettimeofday.c of musl and > > sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_gettime.c of glibc. > > > > Both __NR_clock_gettime and __NR_clock_gettime64 are added for > > sys_gettimeofday() for they share most of the code. > > > > Notes: > > > > * Both tv and tz are not directly passed to kernel clock_gettime* > > syscalls, so, it isn't able to check the pointer automatically with the > > get_user/put_user helpers just like kernel gettimeofday syscall does. > > instead, we emulate (but not completely) such checks in our new > > __NR_clock_gettime* branch of nolibc. > > > > * kernel clock_gettime* syscalls can not get tz info, just like musl and > > glibc do, we set tz to zero to avoid a random number. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> > > --- > > tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > > index 2642b380c6aa..ad38cc3856be 100644 > > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > > > > #include "arch.h" > > #include "errno.h" > > +#include "string.h" > > #include "types.h" > > > > > > @@ -51,6 +52,11 @@ > > * should not be placed here. > > */ > > > > +/* > > + * This is the first address past the end of the text segment (the program code). > > + */ > > + > > +extern char etext; > > > > /* > > * int brk(void *addr); > > @@ -554,7 +560,47 @@ long getpagesize(void) > > static __attribute__((unused)) > > int sys_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz) > > { > > +#ifdef __NR_gettimeofday > > return my_syscall2(__NR_gettimeofday, tv, tz); > > +#elif defined(__NR_clock_gettime) || defined(__NR_clock_gettime64) > > +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime > > + struct timespec ts; > > +#else > > + struct timespec64 ts; > > +#define __NR_clock_gettime __NR_clock_gettime64 > > +#endif > > + int ret; > > + > > + /* make sure tv pointer is at least after code segment */ > > + if (tv != NULL && (char *)tv <= &etext) > > + return -EFAULT; > > To me the weird etext comparisions don't seem to be worth it, to be > honest. > This is the issue we explained in commit message: * Both tv and tz are not directly passed to kernel clock_gettime* syscalls, so, it isn't able to check the pointer automatically with the get_user/put_user helpers just like kernel gettimeofday syscall does. instead, we emulate (but not completely) such checks in our new __NR_clock_gettime* branch of nolibc. but not that deeply described the direct cause, the direct cause is that the test case passes a '(void *)1' and the kernel space of gettimeofday can simply 'fixup' this issue by the get_user/put_user helpers, but our user-space tv and tz code has no such function, just emulate such 'fixup' by a stupid etext compare to at least make sure the data pointer is in data range. Welcome better solution. CASE_TEST(gettimeofday_bad1); EXPECT_SYSER(1, gettimeofday((void *)1, NULL), -1, EFAULT); break; CASE_TEST(gettimeofday_bad2); EXPECT_SYSER(1, gettimeofday(NULL, (void *)1), -1, EFAULT); break; Without this ugly check, the above cases would get such error: 35 gettimeofday_bad1init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at 0x00000002 in init[10000+5000] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 6.4.0-rc1-00134-gf929c7b7184f-dirty #20 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) epc : 00012ccc ra : 00012ca8 sp : 9d254d90 gp : 00016800 tp : 00000000 t0 : 00000000 t1 : 0000000a t2 : 00000000 s0 : 00000001 s1 : 00016008 a0 : 00000000 a1 : 9d254da8 a2 : 00000014 a3 : 00000000 a4 : 00000000 a5 : 00000000 a6 : 00000001 a7 : 00000193 s2 : 00000023 s3 : 9d254da4 s4 : 00000000 s5 : 00000000 s6 : 0000541b s7 : 00000007 s8 : 9d254dcc s9 : 000144e8 s10: 00016000 s11: 00000006 t3 : 00000000 t4 : ffffffff t5 : 00000000 t6 : 00000000 status: 00000020 badaddr: 00000002 cause: 0000000f Will at least append this test error in the commit message of the coming new revision of this patch. Hi, Willy, this also require your discussion, simply remove the above two test cases may be not a good idea too, the check for gettimeofday is perfectly ok. The same 'emulate' method is used in the waitid patch, but that only requires to compare 'pid == INT_MIN', which is not that weird. > > + > > + /* set tz to zero to avoid random number */ > > + if (tz != NULL) { > > + if ((char *)tz > &etext) > > + memset(tz, 0, sizeof(struct timezone)); > > + else > > + return -EFAULT; > > + } > > + The same issue here. > > + if (tv == NULL) > > + return 0; > > + > > + ret = my_syscall2(__NR_clock_gettime, CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + tv->tv_sec = (time_t) ts.tv_sec; > > +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime64 > > Nitpick: > > While this ifdef works and is correct its logic is a bit indirect. > If it is copied to some other function in the future it may be incorrect > there. > > Without the #ifdef the compiler should still be able to optimize the > code away. Ok, will remove the #ifdef wrapper, let the compiler optimize itself. Thanks, Zhangjin > > > + if (tv->tv_sec != ts.tv_sec) > > + return -EOVERFLOW; > > +#endif > > + > > + tv->tv_usec = ts.tv_nsec / 1000; > > + return 0; > > +#else > > +#error None of __NR_gettimeofday, __NR_clock_gettime and __NR_clock_gettime64 defined, cannot implement sys_gettimeofday() > > +#endif > > } > > > > static __attribute__((unused)) > > -- > > 2.25.1 > >
Hi, Thomas, Willy > > On 2023-05-25 02:03:32+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > > > rv32 uses the generic include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h and it has no > > > __NR_gettimeofday and __NR_clock_gettime after kernel commit d4c08b9776b3 > > > ("riscv: Use latest system call ABI"), use __NR_clock_gettime64 instead. > > > > > > This code is based on src/time/gettimeofday.c of musl and > > > sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_gettime.c of glibc. > > > > > > Both __NR_clock_gettime and __NR_clock_gettime64 are added for > > > sys_gettimeofday() for they share most of the code. > > > > > > Notes: > > > > > > * Both tv and tz are not directly passed to kernel clock_gettime* > > > syscalls, so, it isn't able to check the pointer automatically with the > > > get_user/put_user helpers just like kernel gettimeofday syscall does. > > > instead, we emulate (but not completely) such checks in our new > > > __NR_clock_gettime* branch of nolibc. > > > > > > * kernel clock_gettime* syscalls can not get tz info, just like musl and > > > glibc do, we set tz to zero to avoid a random number. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> > > > --- > > > tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > > > index 2642b380c6aa..ad38cc3856be 100644 > > > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > > > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > > > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > > > > > > #include "arch.h" > > > #include "errno.h" > > > +#include "string.h" > > > #include "types.h" > > > > > > > > > @@ -51,6 +52,11 @@ > > > * should not be placed here. > > > */ > > > > > > +/* > > > + * This is the first address past the end of the text segment (the program code). > > > + */ > > > + > > > +extern char etext; > > > > > > /* > > > * int brk(void *addr); > > > @@ -554,7 +560,47 @@ long getpagesize(void) > > > static __attribute__((unused)) > > > int sys_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz) > > > { > > > +#ifdef __NR_gettimeofday > > > return my_syscall2(__NR_gettimeofday, tv, tz); > > > +#elif defined(__NR_clock_gettime) || defined(__NR_clock_gettime64) > > > +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime > > > + struct timespec ts; > > > +#else > > > + struct timespec64 ts; > > > +#define __NR_clock_gettime __NR_clock_gettime64 > > > +#endif > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > + /* make sure tv pointer is at least after code segment */ > > > + if (tv != NULL && (char *)tv <= &etext) > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > > To me the weird etext comparisions don't seem to be worth it, to be > > honest. > > > > This is the issue we explained in commit message: > > * Both tv and tz are not directly passed to kernel clock_gettime* > syscalls, so, it isn't able to check the pointer automatically with the > get_user/put_user helpers just like kernel gettimeofday syscall does. > instead, we emulate (but not completely) such checks in our new > __NR_clock_gettime* branch of nolibc. > > but not that deeply described the direct cause, the direct cause is that the > test case passes a '(void *)1' and the kernel space of gettimeofday can simply > 'fixup' this issue by the get_user/put_user helpers, but our user-space tv and > tz code has no such function, just emulate such 'fixup' by a stupid etext > compare to at least make sure the data pointer is in data range. Welcome better > solution. > > CASE_TEST(gettimeofday_bad1); EXPECT_SYSER(1, gettimeofday((void *)1, NULL), -1, EFAULT); break; > CASE_TEST(gettimeofday_bad2); EXPECT_SYSER(1, gettimeofday(NULL, (void *)1), -1, EFAULT); break; > > Without this ugly check, the above cases would get such error: > > 35 gettimeofday_bad1init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at 0x00000002 in init[10000+5000] > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 6.4.0-rc1-00134-gf929c7b7184f-dirty #20 > Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) > epc : 00012ccc ra : 00012ca8 sp : 9d254d90 > gp : 00016800 tp : 00000000 t0 : 00000000 > t1 : 0000000a t2 : 00000000 s0 : 00000001 > s1 : 00016008 a0 : 00000000 a1 : 9d254da8 > a2 : 00000014 a3 : 00000000 a4 : 00000000 > a5 : 00000000 a6 : 00000001 a7 : 00000193 > s2 : 00000023 s3 : 9d254da4 s4 : 00000000 > s5 : 00000000 s6 : 0000541b s7 : 00000007 > s8 : 9d254dcc s9 : 000144e8 s10: 00016000 > s11: 00000006 t3 : 00000000 t4 : ffffffff > t5 : 00000000 t6 : 00000000 > status: 00000020 badaddr: 00000002 cause: 0000000f > > Will at least append this test error in the commit message of the coming new > revision of this patch. > > Hi, Willy, this also require your discussion, simply remove the above > two test cases may be not a good idea too, the check for gettimeofday is > perfectly ok. > What about this? Just like Willy did in 1da02f51088 ("selftests/nolibc: support glibc as well"), Let's only limit the test case under the __NR_gettimeofday #ifdef: diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c index 702bf449f8d7..d52f3720918e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) CASE_TEST(getdents64_root); EXPECT_SYSNE(1, test_getdents64("/"), -1); break; CASE_TEST(getdents64_null); EXPECT_SYSER(1, test_getdents64("/dev/null"), -1, ENOTDIR); break; CASE_TEST(gettimeofday_null); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, gettimeofday(NULL, NULL)); break; -#ifdef NOLIBC +#if defined(NOLIBC) && defined(__NR_gettimeofday) CASE_TEST(gettimeofday_bad1); EXPECT_SYSER(1, gettimeofday((void *)1, NULL), -1, EFAULT); break; CASE_TEST(gettimeofday_bad2); EXPECT_SYSER(1, gettimeofday(NULL, (void *)1), -1, EFAULT); break; #endif With the above change, we can simply remove the ugly etext check like this: diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h index d1d26da306b7..ebe8ed018db6 100644 --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h @@ -572,17 +572,9 @@ int sys_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz) #endif int ret; - /* make sure tv pointer is at least after code segment */ - if (tv != NULL && (char *)tv <= &etext) - return -EFAULT; - /* set tz to zero to avoid random number */ - if (tz != NULL) { - if ((char *)tz > &etext) - memset(tz, 0, sizeof(struct timezone)); - else - return -EFAULT; - } + if (tz != NULL) + memset(tz, 0, sizeof(struct timezone)); if (tv == NULL) return 0; If agree, will apply this method in the next revision. > The same 'emulate' method is used in the waitid patch, but that only > requires to compare 'pid == INT_MIN', which is not that weird. > > > > + > > > + /* set tz to zero to avoid random number */ > > > + if (tz != NULL) { > > > + if ((char *)tz > &etext) > > > + memset(tz, 0, sizeof(struct timezone)); > > > + else > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > + } > > > + > > The same issue here. > And the one for waitid may work like this: @@ -1390,10 +1382,6 @@ pid_t sys_wait4(pid_t pid, int *status, int options, struct rusage *rusage) int idtype = P_PID; int ret; - /* emulate the 'pid == INT_MIN' path of wait4 */ - if (pid == INT_MIN) - return -ESRCH; - if (pid < -1) { idtype = P_PGID; pid *= -1; @@ -593,7 +593,9 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) CASE_TEST(unlink_root); EXPECT_SYSER(1, unlink("/"), -1, EISDIR); break; CASE_TEST(unlink_blah); EXPECT_SYSER(1, unlink("/proc/self/blah"), -1, ENOENT); break; CASE_TEST(wait_child); EXPECT_SYSER(1, wait(&tmp), -1, ECHILD); break; +#ifdef __NR_wait4 CASE_TEST(waitpid_min); EXPECT_SYSER(1, waitpid(INT_MIN, &tmp, WNOHANG), -1, ESRCH); break; +#endif CASE_TEST(waitpid_child); EXPECT_SYSER(1, waitpid(getpid(), &tmp, WNOHANG), -1, ECHILD); break; CASE_TEST(write_badf); EXPECT_SYSER(1, write(-1, &tmp, 1), -1, EBADF); break; CASE_TEST(write_zero); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, write(1, &tmp, 0)); break; Best regards, Zhangjin
Hi Zhangjin, On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 09:26:35AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > > > @@ -554,7 +560,47 @@ long getpagesize(void) > > > static __attribute__((unused)) > > > int sys_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz) > > > { > > > +#ifdef __NR_gettimeofday > > > return my_syscall2(__NR_gettimeofday, tv, tz); > > > +#elif defined(__NR_clock_gettime) || defined(__NR_clock_gettime64) > > > +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime > > > + struct timespec ts; > > > +#else > > > + struct timespec64 ts; > > > +#define __NR_clock_gettime __NR_clock_gettime64 > > > +#endif > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > + /* make sure tv pointer is at least after code segment */ > > > + if (tv != NULL && (char *)tv <= &etext) > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > > To me the weird etext comparisions don't seem to be worth it, to be > > honest. > > > > This is the issue we explained in commit message: > > * Both tv and tz are not directly passed to kernel clock_gettime* > syscalls, so, it isn't able to check the pointer automatically with the > get_user/put_user helpers just like kernel gettimeofday syscall does. > instead, we emulate (but not completely) such checks in our new > __NR_clock_gettime* branch of nolibc. > > but not that deeply described the direct cause, the direct cause is that the > test case passes a '(void *)1' and the kernel space of gettimeofday can simply > 'fixup' this issue by the get_user/put_user helpers, but our user-space tv and > tz code has no such function, just emulate such 'fixup' by a stupid etext > compare to at least make sure the data pointer is in data range. Welcome better > solution. > > CASE_TEST(gettimeofday_bad1); EXPECT_SYSER(1, gettimeofday((void *)1, NULL), -1, EFAULT); break; > CASE_TEST(gettimeofday_bad2); EXPECT_SYSER(1, gettimeofday(NULL, (void *)1), -1, EFAULT); break; I also disagree with this approach. The purpose of nolibc is not to serve "nolibc-test", but to serve userland programs in the most efficient way possible in terms of code size. Nolibc-test only tries to reproduce a number of well-known success and error cases that applications might face, to detect whether or not we implemented our syscalls correctly and if something recently broke on the kernel side. In no case should we adapt the nolibc code to the tests run by nolibc-test. What this means here is that we need to decide whether the pointer check by the syscall is important for applications, in which case we should do our best to validate it, or if we consider that we really don't care a dime since invalid values will only be sent by bogus applications we do not expect to support, and we get rid of the test. Note that reliably detecting that a pointer is valid from userland is not trivial at all, it requires to rely on other syscalls for the check and is racy in threaded environments. I tend to think that for gettimeofday() we don't really care about invalid pointers we could be seeing here because I can't imagine a single case where this wouldn't come from an application bug, so in my opinion it's fine if the application crashes. The problem here is for nolibc-test. But this just means that we probably need to revisit the way we validate some failures, to only perform some of them on native syscalls and not emulated ones. One approach might consist in tagging emulated syscalls and using this for each test. Originally we only had a 1:1 mapping so this was not a question. But with all the remapping you're encountering we might have no other choice. For example for each syscall we could have: #define _NOLIBC_sys_blah_native 0 // implemented but emulated syscall #define _NOLIBC_sys_blah_native 1 // implemented and native syscall And our macros in nolibc-test could rely on this do skip some tests (just skip the whole test if _NOLIBC_sys_blah_native is not defined, and skip some error tests if it's 0). Overall what I'm seeing is that rv32 integration requires significant changes to the existing nolibc-test infrastructure due to the need to remap many syscalls, and that this will result in much cleaner and more maintainable code than forcefully inserting it there. Now that we're getting a cleaner picture of what the difficulties are, we'd rather work on these as a priority. Regards, Willy
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h index 2642b380c6aa..ad38cc3856be 100644 --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include "arch.h" #include "errno.h" +#include "string.h" #include "types.h" @@ -51,6 +52,11 @@ * should not be placed here. */ +/* + * This is the first address past the end of the text segment (the program code). + */ + +extern char etext; /* * int brk(void *addr); @@ -554,7 +560,47 @@ long getpagesize(void) static __attribute__((unused)) int sys_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz) { +#ifdef __NR_gettimeofday return my_syscall2(__NR_gettimeofday, tv, tz); +#elif defined(__NR_clock_gettime) || defined(__NR_clock_gettime64) +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime + struct timespec ts; +#else + struct timespec64 ts; +#define __NR_clock_gettime __NR_clock_gettime64 +#endif + int ret; + + /* make sure tv pointer is at least after code segment */ + if (tv != NULL && (char *)tv <= &etext) + return -EFAULT; + + /* set tz to zero to avoid random number */ + if (tz != NULL) { + if ((char *)tz > &etext) + memset(tz, 0, sizeof(struct timezone)); + else + return -EFAULT; + } + + if (tv == NULL) + return 0; + + ret = my_syscall2(__NR_clock_gettime, CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts); + if (ret) + return ret; + + tv->tv_sec = (time_t) ts.tv_sec; +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime64 + if (tv->tv_sec != ts.tv_sec) + return -EOVERFLOW; +#endif + + tv->tv_usec = ts.tv_nsec / 1000; + return 0; +#else +#error None of __NR_gettimeofday, __NR_clock_gettime and __NR_clock_gettime64 defined, cannot implement sys_gettimeofday() +#endif } static __attribute__((unused))
rv32 uses the generic include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h and it has no __NR_gettimeofday and __NR_clock_gettime after kernel commit d4c08b9776b3 ("riscv: Use latest system call ABI"), use __NR_clock_gettime64 instead. This code is based on src/time/gettimeofday.c of musl and sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_gettime.c of glibc. Both __NR_clock_gettime and __NR_clock_gettime64 are added for sys_gettimeofday() for they share most of the code. Notes: * Both tv and tz are not directly passed to kernel clock_gettime* syscalls, so, it isn't able to check the pointer automatically with the get_user/put_user helpers just like kernel gettimeofday syscall does. instead, we emulate (but not completely) such checks in our new __NR_clock_gettime* branch of nolibc. * kernel clock_gettime* syscalls can not get tz info, just like musl and glibc do, we set tz to zero to avoid a random number. Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> --- tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)