Message ID | 20230530010801.1558937-1-liu.yun@linux.dev (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | [v7] libbpf: kprobe.multi: Filter with available_filter_functions | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR | fail | PR summary |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 | success | Logs for ShellCheck |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 | success | Logs for set-matrix |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 | success | Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 | success | Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 | success | Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 | success | Logs for build for s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 | success | Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 | success | Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 | success | Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 | success | Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 | success | Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 | success | Logs for veristat |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 | success | Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 | success | Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 | fail | Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 | success | Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 | success | Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 | success | Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 | success | Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 | success | Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 | fail | Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 | success | Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc |
From: Jackie Liu <liu.yun@linux.dev> >+ >+ if (!glob_match(sym_name, res->pattern)) >+ return 0; >+ >+ err = libbpf_ensure_mem((void **) &res->syms, &res->cap, >+ sizeof(const char *), res->cnt + 1); >+ if (err) >+ return err; >+ >+ name = strdup(sym_name); >+ if (!name) >+ return -errno; >+ >+ res->syms[res->cnt++] = name; >+ return 0; >+} >+ >+typedef int (*available_kprobe_cb_t)(const char *sym_name, void *ctx); >+ >+static int >+libbpf_available_kprobes_parse(available_kprobe_cb_t cb, void *ctx) >+{ >+ char sym_name[256]; >+ FILE *f; >+ int ret, err = 0; >+ const char *available_path = tracefs_available_filter_functions(); Dont we need to follow reverse x-mas tree ? >+ >+ f = fopen(available_path, "r"); >+ if (!f) { >+ err = -errno; >+ pr_warn("failed to open %s, fallback to /proc/kallsyms.\n", >+ available_path); >+ return err; >+ } >+ >+ while (true) { >+ ret = fscanf(f, "%255s%*[^\n]\n", sym_name); >+ if (ret == EOF && feof(f)) >+ break; why fscanf() is not setting EOF. Why did you use feof() ? >+ if (ret != 1) { >+ pr_warn("failed to read available kprobe entry: %d\n", >+ ret); >+ err = -EINVAL; >+ break; >+ } >+ >+ err = cb(sym_name, ctx); >+ if (err) >+ break; >+ } >+ >+ fclose(f); >+ return err; >+} >+ >+static void kprobe_multi_resolve_free(struct kprobe_multi_resolve *res) >+{ >+ while (res->syms && res->cnt) >+ free((char *)res->syms[--res->cnt]); >+ >+ free(res->syms); >+ free(res->addrs); it looks odd to do allocation in libbpf_xxx (libbpf_ensure_mem ) function and freeing in a static function. >+ >+ /* reset to zero, when fallback */ >+ res->cap = 0; >+ res->cnt = 0; >+ res->syms = NULL; >+ res->addrs = NULL; >+} >+ > struct bpf_link * > bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog, > const char *pattern, >@@ -10476,13 +10558,21 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog, > return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL); > > if (pattern) { >- err = libbpf_kallsyms_parse(resolve_kprobe_multi_cb, &res); >- if (err) >- goto error; >+ err = libbpf_available_kprobes_parse(ftrace_resolve_kprobe_multi_cb, >+ &res); >+ if (err) { >+ /* fallback to kallsyms */ >+ kprobe_multi_resolve_free(&res); >+ err = libbpf_kallsyms_parse(kallsyms_resolve_kprobe_multi_cb, >+ &res); >+ if (err) >+ goto error; >+ } > if (!res.cnt) { > err = -ENOENT; > goto error; > } >+ syms = res.syms; > addrs = res.addrs; > cnt = res.cnt; > } >@@ -10511,12 +10601,12 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog, > goto error; > } > link->fd = link_fd; >- free(res.addrs); >+ kprobe_multi_resolve_free(&res); > return link; > > error: > free(link); >- free(res.addrs); >+ kprobe_multi_resolve_free(&res); > return libbpf_err_ptr(err); > } > >-- >2.25.1
在 2023/5/30 11:44, Ratheesh Kannoth 写道: > From: Jackie Liu <liu.yun@linux.dev> > >> + >> + if (!glob_match(sym_name, res->pattern)) >> + return 0; >> + >> + err = libbpf_ensure_mem((void **) &res->syms, &res->cap, >> + sizeof(const char *), res->cnt + 1); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> + >> + name = strdup(sym_name); >> + if (!name) >> + return -errno; >> + >> + res->syms[res->cnt++] = name; >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +typedef int (*available_kprobe_cb_t)(const char *sym_name, void *ctx); >> + >> +static int >> +libbpf_available_kprobes_parse(available_kprobe_cb_t cb, void *ctx) >> +{ >> + char sym_name[256]; >> + FILE *f; >> + int ret, err = 0; >> + const char *available_path = tracefs_available_filter_functions(); > Dont we need to follow reverse x-mas tree ? > >> + >> + f = fopen(available_path, "r"); >> + if (!f) { >> + err = -errno; >> + pr_warn("failed to open %s, fallback to /proc/kallsyms.\n", >> + available_path); >> + return err; >> + } >> + >> + while (true) { >> + ret = fscanf(f, "%255s%*[^\n]\n", sym_name); >> + if (ret == EOF && feof(f)) >> + break; > why fscanf() is not setting EOF. Why did you use feof() ? The fscanf function returns EOF (End of File) when one of the following conditions is met: End of file is reached: When fscanf reaches the end of the file being read, it returns EOF. This indicates that there are no more characters to read from the file. Input error occurs: If fscanf encounters an error while reading input, such as a format mismatch or inability to read the expected data type, it returns EOF. Stream error occurs: If an error occurs with the stream itself, such as an error in the underlying file system or I/O error, fscanf may return EOF.
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index ad1ec893b41b..a7f64c5f3a3b 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -10106,6 +10106,12 @@ static const char *tracefs_uprobe_events(void) return use_debugfs() ? DEBUGFS"/uprobe_events" : TRACEFS"/uprobe_events"; } +static const char *tracefs_available_filter_functions(void) +{ + return use_debugfs() ? DEBUGFS"/available_filter_functions" : + TRACEFS"/available_filter_functions"; +} + static void gen_kprobe_legacy_event_name(char *buf, size_t buf_sz, const char *kfunc_name, size_t offset) { @@ -10417,13 +10423,14 @@ static bool glob_match(const char *str, const char *pat) struct kprobe_multi_resolve { const char *pattern; unsigned long *addrs; + const char **syms; size_t cap; size_t cnt; }; static int -resolve_kprobe_multi_cb(unsigned long long sym_addr, char sym_type, - const char *sym_name, void *ctx) +kallsyms_resolve_kprobe_multi_cb(unsigned long long sym_addr, char sym_type, + const char *sym_name, void *ctx) { struct kprobe_multi_resolve *res = ctx; int err; @@ -10440,6 +10447,81 @@ resolve_kprobe_multi_cb(unsigned long long sym_addr, char sym_type, return 0; } +static int ftrace_resolve_kprobe_multi_cb(const char *sym_name, void *ctx) +{ + struct kprobe_multi_resolve *res = ctx; + int err; + char *name; + + if (!glob_match(sym_name, res->pattern)) + return 0; + + err = libbpf_ensure_mem((void **) &res->syms, &res->cap, + sizeof(const char *), res->cnt + 1); + if (err) + return err; + + name = strdup(sym_name); + if (!name) + return -errno; + + res->syms[res->cnt++] = name; + return 0; +} + +typedef int (*available_kprobe_cb_t)(const char *sym_name, void *ctx); + +static int +libbpf_available_kprobes_parse(available_kprobe_cb_t cb, void *ctx) +{ + char sym_name[256]; + FILE *f; + int ret, err = 0; + const char *available_path = tracefs_available_filter_functions(); + + f = fopen(available_path, "r"); + if (!f) { + err = -errno; + pr_warn("failed to open %s, fallback to /proc/kallsyms.\n", + available_path); + return err; + } + + while (true) { + ret = fscanf(f, "%255s%*[^\n]\n", sym_name); + if (ret == EOF && feof(f)) + break; + if (ret != 1) { + pr_warn("failed to read available kprobe entry: %d\n", + ret); + err = -EINVAL; + break; + } + + err = cb(sym_name, ctx); + if (err) + break; + } + + fclose(f); + return err; +} + +static void kprobe_multi_resolve_free(struct kprobe_multi_resolve *res) +{ + while (res->syms && res->cnt) + free((char *)res->syms[--res->cnt]); + + free(res->syms); + free(res->addrs); + + /* reset to zero, when fallback */ + res->cap = 0; + res->cnt = 0; + res->syms = NULL; + res->addrs = NULL; +} + struct bpf_link * bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog, const char *pattern, @@ -10476,13 +10558,21 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog, return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL); if (pattern) { - err = libbpf_kallsyms_parse(resolve_kprobe_multi_cb, &res); - if (err) - goto error; + err = libbpf_available_kprobes_parse(ftrace_resolve_kprobe_multi_cb, + &res); + if (err) { + /* fallback to kallsyms */ + kprobe_multi_resolve_free(&res); + err = libbpf_kallsyms_parse(kallsyms_resolve_kprobe_multi_cb, + &res); + if (err) + goto error; + } if (!res.cnt) { err = -ENOENT; goto error; } + syms = res.syms; addrs = res.addrs; cnt = res.cnt; } @@ -10511,12 +10601,12 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog, goto error; } link->fd = link_fd; - free(res.addrs); + kprobe_multi_resolve_free(&res); return link; error: free(link); - free(res.addrs); + kprobe_multi_resolve_free(&res); return libbpf_err_ptr(err); }