diff mbox series

bpf/tests: Use struct_size()

Message ID 20230531043251.989312-1-suhui@nfschina.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 0d2da4b595d03009db7dfb5ebf01c547b89b0ad8
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf/tests: Use struct_size() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Su Hui May 31, 2023, 4:32 a.m. UTC
Use struct_size() instead of hand writing it.
This is less verbose and more informative.

Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@nfschina.com>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Yonghong Song May 31, 2023, 6:08 a.m. UTC | #1
On 5/30/23 9:32 PM, Su Hui wrote:
> Use struct_size() instead of hand writing it.
> This is less verbose and more informative.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@nfschina.com>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org May 31, 2023, 11:10 a.m. UTC | #2
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Wed, 31 May 2023 12:32:51 +0800 you wrote:
> Use struct_size() instead of hand writing it.
> This is less verbose and more informative.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@nfschina.com>
> ---
>  lib/test_bpf.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Here is the summary with links:
  - bpf/tests: Use struct_size()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/0d2da4b595d0

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index ade9ac672adb..fa0833410ac1 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -15056,8 +15056,7 @@  static __init int prepare_tail_call_tests(struct bpf_array **pprogs)
 	int which, err;
 
 	/* Allocate the table of programs to be used for tall calls */
-	progs = kzalloc(sizeof(*progs) + (ntests + 1) * sizeof(progs->ptrs[0]),
-			GFP_KERNEL);
+	progs = kzalloc(struct_size(progs, ptrs, ntests + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!progs)
 		goto out_nomem;