Message ID | 20230530015223.147755-11-zhaotianrui@loongson.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Add KVM LoongArch support | expand |
在 2023/5/30 09:52, Tianrui Zhao 写道: > Implement LoongArch vcpu KVM_ENABLE_CAP ioctl interface. > > Signed-off-by: Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn> > --- > arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c > index 278fbafc59b4..5a88f815c412 100644 > --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c > @@ -186,6 +186,23 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs) > return 0; > } > > +static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + struct kvm_enable_cap *cap) > +{ > + int r = 0; > + > + if (!kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(vcpu->kvm, cap->cap)) > + return -EINVAL; It is a little strange to check extension of the whole vm in enable vcap capability. can we change to usage like general architectures? > + if (cap->flags) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (cap->args[0]) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (cap->cap) > + return -EINVAL; Do we need check args[0] and cap here ? Regards Bibo, Mao > + > + return r; > +} > + > long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp, > unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg) > { > @@ -209,6 +226,15 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp, > r = _kvm_get_reg(vcpu, ®); > break; > } > + case KVM_ENABLE_CAP: { > + struct kvm_enable_cap cap; > + > + r = -EFAULT; > + if (copy_from_user(&cap, argp, sizeof(cap))) > + break; > + r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(vcpu, &cap); > + break; > + } > default: > r = -ENOIOCTLCMD; > break;
在 2023年06月05日 21:12, bibo, mao 写道: > > 在 2023/5/30 09:52, Tianrui Zhao 写道: >> Implement LoongArch vcpu KVM_ENABLE_CAP ioctl interface. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn> >> --- >> arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c >> index 278fbafc59b4..5a88f815c412 100644 >> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c >> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c >> @@ -186,6 +186,23 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs) >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, >> + struct kvm_enable_cap *cap) >> +{ >> + int r = 0; >> + >> + if (!kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(vcpu->kvm, cap->cap)) >> + return -EINVAL; > It is a little strange to check extension of the whole vm in enable vcap capability. > can we change to usage like general architectures? Thanks, I look up this interface of other archs and re-consider it, and I think it should be removed. Thanks Tianrui Zhao > >> + if (cap->flags) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + if (cap->args[0]) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + if (cap->cap) >> + return -EINVAL; > Do we need check args[0] and cap here ? > > Regards > Bibo, Mao No need, I will remove the two conditions. Thanks Tianrui Zhao >> + >> + return r; >> +} >> + >> long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp, >> unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg) >> { >> @@ -209,6 +226,15 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp, >> r = _kvm_get_reg(vcpu, ®); >> break; >> } >> + case KVM_ENABLE_CAP: { >> + struct kvm_enable_cap cap; >> + >> + r = -EFAULT; >> + if (copy_from_user(&cap, argp, sizeof(cap))) >> + break; >> + r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(vcpu, &cap); >> + break; >> + } >> default: >> r = -ENOIOCTLCMD; >> break;
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c index 278fbafc59b4..5a88f815c412 100644 --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c @@ -186,6 +186,23 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs) return 0; } +static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct kvm_enable_cap *cap) +{ + int r = 0; + + if (!kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(vcpu->kvm, cap->cap)) + return -EINVAL; + if (cap->flags) + return -EINVAL; + if (cap->args[0]) + return -EINVAL; + if (cap->cap) + return -EINVAL; + + return r; +} + long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg) { @@ -209,6 +226,15 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp, r = _kvm_get_reg(vcpu, ®); break; } + case KVM_ENABLE_CAP: { + struct kvm_enable_cap cap; + + r = -EFAULT; + if (copy_from_user(&cap, argp, sizeof(cap))) + break; + r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(vcpu, &cap); + break; + } default: r = -ENOIOCTLCMD; break;
Implement LoongArch vcpu KVM_ENABLE_CAP ioctl interface. Signed-off-by: Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn> --- arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)