diff mbox series

[v2] base/node / acpi: Change 'node_hmem_attrs' to 'access_coordinates'

Message ID 168660916231.1965241.248859226126456131.stgit@djiang5-mobl3 (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere, archived
Headers show
Series [v2] base/node / acpi: Change 'node_hmem_attrs' to 'access_coordinates' | expand

Commit Message

Dave Jiang June 12, 2023, 10:32 p.m. UTC 
Dan Williams suggested changing the struct 'node_hmem_attrs' to
'access_coordinates' [1]. The struct is a container of r/w-latency and
r/w-bandwidth numbers. Moving forward, this container will also be used by
CXL to store the performance characteristics of each link hop in
the PCIE/CXL topology. So, where node_hmem_attrs is just the access
parameters of a memory-node, access_coordinates applies more broadly
to hardware topology characteristics. The observation is that seemed like
an excercise in having the application identify "where" it falls on a
spectrum of bandwidth and latency needs. For the tuple of read/write-latency
and read/write-bandwidth, "coordinates" is not a perfect fit. Sometimes it
is just conveying values in isolation and not a "location" relative to
other performance points, but in the end this data is used to identify the
performance operation point of a given memory-node. [2]

Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/64471313421f7_1b66294d5@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/645e6215ee0de_1e6f2945e@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>

---

Hi Greg and Rafael,
please consider ACK this patch and Dan can take it through the
CXL upstream tree. The remaining ACPI [1] and CXL [2] patches for enabling
CXL QoS class data have dependency on this patch. Thank you!

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/168333141100.2290593.16294670316057617744.stgit@djiang5-mobl3/T/#t
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/168451588868.3470703.3527256859632103687.stgit@djiang5-mobl3/T/#t

v2:
- Add additional descriptions from Dan on reasoning behind using
  access_coordinate. (Jonathan)
---
 drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c |   20 ++++++++++----------
 drivers/base/node.c      |   12 ++++++------
 include/linux/node.h     |    8 ++++----
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Comments

Greg Kroah-Hartman June 13, 2023, 7:57 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:32:42PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Dan Williams suggested changing the struct 'node_hmem_attrs' to
> 'access_coordinates' [1]. The struct is a container of r/w-latency and
> r/w-bandwidth numbers. Moving forward, this container will also be used by
> CXL to store the performance characteristics of each link hop in
> the PCIE/CXL topology. So, where node_hmem_attrs is just the access
> parameters of a memory-node, access_coordinates applies more broadly
> to hardware topology characteristics. The observation is that seemed like
> an excercise in having the application identify "where" it falls on a
> spectrum of bandwidth and latency needs. For the tuple of read/write-latency
> and read/write-bandwidth, "coordinates" is not a perfect fit. Sometimes it
> is just conveying values in isolation and not a "location" relative to
> other performance points, but in the end this data is used to identify the
> performance operation point of a given memory-node. [2]
> 
> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/64471313421f7_1b66294d5@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/645e6215ee0de_1e6f2945e@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
> Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Hi Greg and Rafael,
> please consider ACK this patch and Dan can take it through the
> CXL upstream tree. The remaining ACPI [1] and CXL [2] patches for enabling
> CXL QoS class data have dependency on this patch. Thank you!
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/168333141100.2290593.16294670316057617744.stgit@djiang5-mobl3/T/#t
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/168451588868.3470703.3527256859632103687.stgit@djiang5-mobl3/T/#t

Isn't this going to conflict with the version that I have in the
driver-core-next tree as commit 7810f4dc8795 ("base/node: Use 'property'
to identify an access parameter")?

Or was that a different thing?

thanks,

greg k-h
Dave Jiang June 13, 2023, 4:19 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 6/13/23 00:57, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:32:42PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>> Dan Williams suggested changing the struct 'node_hmem_attrs' to
>> 'access_coordinates' [1]. The struct is a container of r/w-latency and
>> r/w-bandwidth numbers. Moving forward, this container will also be used by
>> CXL to store the performance characteristics of each link hop in
>> the PCIE/CXL topology. So, where node_hmem_attrs is just the access
>> parameters of a memory-node, access_coordinates applies more broadly
>> to hardware topology characteristics. The observation is that seemed like
>> an excercise in having the application identify "where" it falls on a
>> spectrum of bandwidth and latency needs. For the tuple of read/write-latency
>> and read/write-bandwidth, "coordinates" is not a perfect fit. Sometimes it
>> is just conveying values in isolation and not a "location" relative to
>> other performance points, but in the end this data is used to identify the
>> performance operation point of a given memory-node. [2]
>>
>> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/64471313421f7_1b66294d5@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/645e6215ee0de_1e6f2945e@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
>> Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi Greg and Rafael,
>> please consider ACK this patch and Dan can take it through the
>> CXL upstream tree. The remaining ACPI [1] and CXL [2] patches for enabling
>> CXL QoS class data have dependency on this patch. Thank you!
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/168333141100.2290593.16294670316057617744.stgit@djiang5-mobl3/T/#t
>> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/168451588868.3470703.3527256859632103687.stgit@djiang5-mobl3/T/#t
> Isn't this going to conflict with the version that I have in the
> driver-core-next tree as commit 7810f4dc8795 ("base/node: Use 'property'
> to identify an access parameter")?
>
> Or was that a different thing?

Yes this is a different thing and should not conflict. But a small 
dependency on the mentioned commit above however:

@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static ssize_t property##_show(struct device *dev,			\
  			   char *buf)					\
  {									\
  	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n",					\
-			  to_access_nodes(dev)->hmem_attrs.property);	\
+			  to_access_nodes(dev)->coord.property);	\
  }									\
  static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(property)
  


>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Greg Kroah-Hartman June 15, 2023, 11:24 a.m. UTC | #3 
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:32:42PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Dan Williams suggested changing the struct 'node_hmem_attrs' to
> 'access_coordinates' [1]. The struct is a container of r/w-latency and
> r/w-bandwidth numbers. Moving forward, this container will also be used by
> CXL to store the performance characteristics of each link hop in
> the PCIE/CXL topology. So, where node_hmem_attrs is just the access
> parameters of a memory-node, access_coordinates applies more broadly
> to hardware topology characteristics. The observation is that seemed like
> an excercise in having the application identify "where" it falls on a
> spectrum of bandwidth and latency needs. For the tuple of read/write-latency
> and read/write-bandwidth, "coordinates" is not a perfect fit. Sometimes it
> is just conveying values in isolation and not a "location" relative to
> other performance points, but in the end this data is used to identify the
> performance operation point of a given memory-node. [2]
> 
> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/64471313421f7_1b66294d5@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/645e6215ee0de_1e6f2945e@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
> Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Hi Greg and Rafael,
> please consider ACK this patch and Dan can take it through the
> CXL upstream tree. The remaining ACPI [1] and CXL [2] patches for enabling
> CXL QoS class data have dependency on this patch. Thank you!
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/168333141100.2290593.16294670316057617744.stgit@djiang5-mobl3/T/#t
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/168451588868.3470703.3527256859632103687.stgit@djiang5-mobl3/T/#t

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
index bba268ecd802..f9ff992038fa 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@  struct memory_target {
 	unsigned int memory_pxm;
 	unsigned int processor_pxm;
 	struct resource memregions;
-	struct node_hmem_attrs hmem_attrs[2];
+	struct access_coordinate coord[2];
 	struct list_head caches;
 	struct node_cache_attrs cache_attrs;
 	bool registered;
@@ -227,24 +227,24 @@  static void hmat_update_target_access(struct memory_target *target,
 {
 	switch (type) {
 	case ACPI_HMAT_ACCESS_LATENCY:
-		target->hmem_attrs[access].read_latency = value;
-		target->hmem_attrs[access].write_latency = value;
+		target->coord[access].read_latency = value;
+		target->coord[access].write_latency = value;
 		break;
 	case ACPI_HMAT_READ_LATENCY:
-		target->hmem_attrs[access].read_latency = value;
+		target->coord[access].read_latency = value;
 		break;
 	case ACPI_HMAT_WRITE_LATENCY:
-		target->hmem_attrs[access].write_latency = value;
+		target->coord[access].write_latency = value;
 		break;
 	case ACPI_HMAT_ACCESS_BANDWIDTH:
-		target->hmem_attrs[access].read_bandwidth = value;
-		target->hmem_attrs[access].write_bandwidth = value;
+		target->coord[access].read_bandwidth = value;
+		target->coord[access].write_bandwidth = value;
 		break;
 	case ACPI_HMAT_READ_BANDWIDTH:
-		target->hmem_attrs[access].read_bandwidth = value;
+		target->coord[access].read_bandwidth = value;
 		break;
 	case ACPI_HMAT_WRITE_BANDWIDTH:
-		target->hmem_attrs[access].write_bandwidth = value;
+		target->coord[access].write_bandwidth = value;
 		break;
 	default:
 		break;
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@  static void hmat_register_target_cache(struct memory_target *target)
 static void hmat_register_target_perf(struct memory_target *target, int access)
 {
 	unsigned mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
-	node_set_perf_attrs(mem_nid, &target->hmem_attrs[access], access);
+	node_set_perf_attrs(mem_nid, &target->coord[access], access);
 }
 
 static void hmat_register_target_devices(struct memory_target *target)
diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
index 2cada01c70da..fc0444b617d0 100644
--- a/drivers/base/node.c
+++ b/drivers/base/node.c
@@ -75,14 +75,14 @@  static BIN_ATTR_RO(cpulist, CPULIST_FILE_MAX_BYTES);
  * @dev:	Device for this memory access class
  * @list_node:	List element in the node's access list
  * @access:	The access class rank
- * @hmem_attrs: Heterogeneous memory performance attributes
+ * @coord:	Heterogeneous memory performance coordinates
  */
 struct node_access_nodes {
 	struct device		dev;
 	struct list_head	list_node;
 	unsigned int		access;
 #ifdef CONFIG_HMEM_REPORTING
-	struct node_hmem_attrs	hmem_attrs;
+	struct access_coordinate	coord;
 #endif
 };
 #define to_access_nodes(dev) container_of(dev, struct node_access_nodes, dev)
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@  static ssize_t property##_show(struct device *dev,			\
 			   char *buf)					\
 {									\
 	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n",					\
-			  to_access_nodes(dev)->hmem_attrs.property);	\
+			  to_access_nodes(dev)->coord.property);	\
 }									\
 static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(property)
 
@@ -188,10 +188,10 @@  static struct attribute *access_attrs[] = {
 /**
  * node_set_perf_attrs - Set the performance values for given access class
  * @nid: Node identifier to be set
- * @hmem_attrs: Heterogeneous memory performance attributes
+ * @coord: Heterogeneous memory performance coordinates
  * @access: The access class the for the given attributes
  */
-void node_set_perf_attrs(unsigned int nid, struct node_hmem_attrs *hmem_attrs,
+void node_set_perf_attrs(unsigned int nid, struct access_coordinate *coord,
 			 unsigned int access)
 {
 	struct node_access_nodes *c;
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@  void node_set_perf_attrs(unsigned int nid, struct node_hmem_attrs *hmem_attrs,
 	if (!c)
 		return;
 
-	c->hmem_attrs = *hmem_attrs;
+	c->coord = *coord;
 	for (i = 0; access_attrs[i] != NULL; i++) {
 		if (sysfs_add_file_to_group(&c->dev.kobj, access_attrs[i],
 					    "initiators")) {
diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
index 427a5975cf40..25b66d705ee2 100644
--- a/include/linux/node.h
+++ b/include/linux/node.h
@@ -20,14 +20,14 @@ 
 #include <linux/list.h>
 
 /**
- * struct node_hmem_attrs - heterogeneous memory performance attributes
+ * struct access_coordinate - generic performance coordinates container
  *
  * @read_bandwidth:	Read bandwidth in MB/s
  * @write_bandwidth:	Write bandwidth in MB/s
  * @read_latency:	Read latency in nanoseconds
  * @write_latency:	Write latency in nanoseconds
  */
-struct node_hmem_attrs {
+struct access_coordinate {
 	unsigned int read_bandwidth;
 	unsigned int write_bandwidth;
 	unsigned int read_latency;
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@  struct node_cache_attrs {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HMEM_REPORTING
 void node_add_cache(unsigned int nid, struct node_cache_attrs *cache_attrs);
-void node_set_perf_attrs(unsigned int nid, struct node_hmem_attrs *hmem_attrs,
+void node_set_perf_attrs(unsigned int nid, struct access_coordinate *coord,
 			 unsigned access);
 #else
 static inline void node_add_cache(unsigned int nid,
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@  static inline void node_add_cache(unsigned int nid,
 }
 
 static inline void node_set_perf_attrs(unsigned int nid,
-				       struct node_hmem_attrs *hmem_attrs,
+				       struct access_coordinate *coord,
 				       unsigned access)
 {
 }