diff mbox series

[v12,4/4] evm: Support multiple LSMs providing an xattr

Message ID 20230610075738.3273764-5-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere
Delegated to: Paul Moore
Headers show
Series evm: Do HMAC of multiple per LSM xattrs for new inodes | expand

Commit Message

Roberto Sassu June 10, 2023, 7:57 a.m. UTC 
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>

Currently, evm_inode_init_security() processes a single LSM xattr from the
array passed by security_inode_init_security(), and calculates the HMAC on
it and other inode metadata.

As the LSM infrastructure now can pass to EVM an array with multiple
xattrs, scan them until the terminator (xattr name NULL), and calculate the
HMAC on all of them.

Also, double check that the xattrs array terminator is the first non-filled
slot (obtained with lsm_get_xattr_slot()). Consumers of the xattrs array,
such as the initxattrs() callbacks, rely on the terminator.

Finally, change the name of the lsm_xattr parameter of evm_init_hmac() to
xattrs, to reflect the new type of information passed.

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/evm/evm.h        |  4 +++-
 security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 11 +++++++++--
 security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c   | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Mimi Zohar June 14, 2023, 11:55 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 09:57 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> 
> Currently, evm_inode_init_security() processes a single LSM xattr from the
> array passed by security_inode_init_security(), and calculates the HMAC on
> it and other inode metadata.
> 
> As the LSM infrastructure now can pass to EVM an array with multiple
> xattrs, scan them until the terminator (xattr name NULL), and calculate the
> HMAC on all of them.
> 
> Also, double check that the xattrs array terminator is the first non-filled
> slot (obtained with lsm_get_xattr_slot()). Consumers of the xattrs array,
> such as the initxattrs() callbacks, rely on the terminator.
> 
> Finally, change the name of the lsm_xattr parameter of evm_init_hmac() to
> xattrs, to reflect the new type of information passed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks, Roberto!

Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm.h b/security/integrity/evm/evm.h
index f8b8c5004fc..53bd7fec93f 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm.h
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm.h
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@  struct evm_digest {
 	char digest[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
 } __packed;
 
+int evm_protected_xattr(const char *req_xattr_name);
+
 int evm_init_key(void);
 int evm_update_evmxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 			const char *req_xattr_name,
@@ -58,7 +60,7 @@  int evm_calc_hash(struct dentry *dentry, const char *req_xattr_name,
 		  const char *req_xattr_value,
 		  size_t req_xattr_value_len, char type,
 		  struct evm_digest *data);
-int evm_init_hmac(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr,
+int evm_init_hmac(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattrs,
 		  char *hmac_val);
 int evm_init_secfs(void);
 
diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
index 033804f5a5f..eb6b9f0a5e9 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
@@ -385,10 +385,11 @@  int evm_update_evmxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
 	return rc;
 }
 
-int evm_init_hmac(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *lsm_xattr,
+int evm_init_hmac(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattrs,
 		  char *hmac_val)
 {
 	struct shash_desc *desc;
+	const struct xattr *xattr;
 
 	desc = init_desc(EVM_XATTR_HMAC, HASH_ALGO_SHA1);
 	if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
@@ -396,7 +397,13 @@  int evm_init_hmac(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *lsm_xattr,
 		return PTR_ERR(desc);
 	}
 
-	crypto_shash_update(desc, lsm_xattr->value, lsm_xattr->value_len);
+	for (xattr = xattrs; xattr->name; xattr++) {
+		if (!evm_protected_xattr(xattr->name))
+			continue;
+
+		crypto_shash_update(desc, xattr->value, xattr->value_len);
+	}
+
 	hmac_add_misc(desc, inode, EVM_XATTR_HMAC, hmac_val);
 	kfree(desc);
 	return 0;
diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
index 475196ce712..7c6c9064ff5 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@  static int evm_protected_xattr_common(const char *req_xattr_name,
 	return found;
 }
 
-static int evm_protected_xattr(const char *req_xattr_name)
+int evm_protected_xattr(const char *req_xattr_name)
 {
 	return evm_protected_xattr_common(req_xattr_name, false);
 }
@@ -870,14 +870,35 @@  int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
 			    int *xattr_count)
 {
 	struct evm_xattr *xattr_data;
-	struct xattr *evm_xattr;
+	struct xattr *xattr, *evm_xattr;
+	bool evm_protected_xattrs = false;
 	int rc;
 
-	if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) || !xattrs ||
-	    !evm_protected_xattr(xattrs->name))
+	if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) || !xattrs)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * security_inode_init_security() makes sure that the xattrs array is
+	 * contiguous, there is enough space for security.evm, and that there is
+	 * a terminator at the end of the array.
+	 */
+	for (xattr = xattrs; xattr->name; xattr++) {
+		if (evm_protected_xattr(xattr->name))
+			evm_protected_xattrs = true;
+	}
+
+	/* EVM xattr not needed. */
+	if (!evm_protected_xattrs)
 		return 0;
 
 	evm_xattr = lsm_get_xattr_slot(xattrs, xattr_count);
+	/*
+	 * Array terminator (xattr name = NULL) must be the first non-filled
+	 * xattr slot.
+	 */
+	WARN_ONCE(evm_xattr != xattr,
+		  "%s: xattrs terminator is not the first non-filled slot\n",
+		  __func__);
 
 	xattr_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*xattr_data), GFP_NOFS);
 	if (!xattr_data)