diff mbox series

[v5] Bluetooth: msft: Extended monitor tracking by address filter

Message ID 20230621100031.19477-1-hildawu@realtek.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 53c7c193d66ae7a22f137b38d0d374c756892bd4
Headers show
Series [v5] Bluetooth: msft: Extended monitor tracking by address filter | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
tedd_an/pre-ci_am success Success
tedd_an/CheckPatch success CheckPatch PASS
tedd_an/GitLint success Gitlint PASS
tedd_an/SubjectPrefix success Gitlint PASS
tedd_an/BuildKernel success BuildKernel PASS
tedd_an/CheckAllWarning success CheckAllWarning PASS
tedd_an/CheckSparse success CheckSparse PASS
tedd_an/CheckSmatch success CheckSparse PASS
tedd_an/BuildKernel32 success BuildKernel32 PASS
tedd_an/TestRunnerSetup success TestRunnerSetup PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_l2cap-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_iso-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_bnep-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_mgmt-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_rfcomm-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_sco-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_ioctl-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_mesh-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_smp-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_userchan-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/IncrementalBuild success Incremental Build PASS

Commit Message

Hilda Wu June 21, 2023, 10 a.m. UTC
From: Hilda Wu <hildawu@realtek.com>

Since limited tracking device per condition, this feature is to support
tracking multiple devices concurrently.
When a pattern monitor detects the device, this feature issues an address
monitor for tracking that device. Let pattern monitor can keep monitor
new devices.
This feature adds an address filter when receiving a LE monitor device
event which monitor handle is for a pattern, and the controller started
monitoring the device. And this feature also has cancelled the monitor
advertisement from address filters when receiving a LE monitor device
event when the controller stopped monitoring the device specified by an
address and monitor handle.

Below is an example to know the feature adds the address filter.

//Add MSFT pattern monitor
< HCI Command: Vendor (0x3f|0x00f0) plen 14          #142 [hci0] 55.552420
        03 b8 a4 03 ff 01 01 06 09 05 5f 52 45 46        .........._REF
> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 6          #143 [hci0] 55.653960
      Vendor (0x3f|0x00f0) ncmd 2
        Status: Success (0x00)
        03 00

//Got event from the pattern monitor
> HCI Event: Vendor (0xff) plen 18                   #148 [hci0] 58.384953
        23 79 54 33 77 88 97 68 02 00 fb c1 29 eb 27 b8  #yT3w..h....).'.
        00 01                                            ..

//Add MSFT address monitor (Sample address: B8:27:EB:29:C1:FB)
< HCI Command: Vendor (0x3f|0x00f0) plen 13          #149 [hci0] 58.385067
        03 b8 a4 03 ff 04 00 fb c1 29 eb 27 b8           .........).'.

//Report to userspace about found device (ADV Monitor Device Found)
@ MGMT Event: Unknown (0x002f) plen 38           {0x0003} [hci0] 58.680042
        01 00 fb c1 29 eb 27 b8 01 ce 00 00 00 00 16 00  ....).'.........
        0a 09 4b 45 59 42 44 5f 52 45 46 02 01 06 03 19  ..KEYBD_REF.....
        c1 03 03 03 12 18                                ......

//Got event from address monitor
> HCI Event: Vendor (0xff) plen 18                   #152 [hci0] 58.672956
        23 79 54 33 77 88 97 68 02 00 fb c1 29 eb 27 b8  #yT3w..h....).'.
        01 01

Signed-off-by: Alex Lu <alex_lu@realsil.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Hilda Wu <hildawu@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
---
Changes in v5:
- Change quirk name and description.
- Add btmon sample

Changes in v4:
- Follow suggested, modification include allocate an address_filter
  cb and pass to hci_cmd_sync_queue, etc.

Changes in v3:
- Added flag for the feature.
- Modified debug message level.
- Follow suggested, using reverse xmas tree in new code.

Changes in v2:
- Fixed build bot warning, removed un-used parameter.
- Follow suggested, adjust for readability and idiomatic, modified
  error case, etc.
---
---
 drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c   |   4 +
 include/net/bluetooth/hci.h |  10 +
 net/bluetooth/msft.c        | 412 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 411 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

bluez.test.bot@gmail.com June 21, 2023, 10:33 a.m. UTC | #1
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=759053

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    PASS      1.45 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      0.35 seconds
SubjectPrefix                 PASS      0.13 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      32.28 seconds
CheckAllWarning               PASS      35.44 seconds
CheckSparse                   PASS      40.65 seconds
CheckSmatch                   PASS      112.92 seconds
BuildKernel32                 PASS      31.27 seconds
TestRunnerSetup               PASS      445.76 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester       PASS      16.59 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester         PASS      23.14 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester        PASS      5.36 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester        PASS      128.25 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester      PASS      8.66 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester         PASS      8.00 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester       PASS      9.20 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester        PASS      6.84 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester         PASS      7.94 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester    PASS      5.67 seconds
IncrementalBuild              PASS      29.96 seconds



---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
patchwork-bot+bluetooth@kernel.org June 26, 2023, 8:42 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello:

This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master)
by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>:

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:00:31 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Hilda Wu <hildawu@realtek.com>
> 
> Since limited tracking device per condition, this feature is to support
> tracking multiple devices concurrently.
> When a pattern monitor detects the device, this feature issues an address
> monitor for tracking that device. Let pattern monitor can keep monitor
> new devices.
> This feature adds an address filter when receiving a LE monitor device
> event which monitor handle is for a pattern, and the controller started
> monitoring the device. And this feature also has cancelled the monitor
> advertisement from address filters when receiving a LE monitor device
> event when the controller stopped monitoring the device specified by an
> address and monitor handle.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v5] Bluetooth: msft: Extended monitor tracking by address filter
    https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/53c7c193d66a

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c
index 04399b3c39a0..ddae6524106d 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c
@@ -1269,6 +1269,10 @@  void btrtl_set_quirks(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct btrtl_device_info *btrtl_dev)
 		if (btrtl_dev->project_id == CHIP_ID_8852C)
 			btrealtek_set_flag(hdev, REALTEK_ALT6_CONTINUOUS_TX_CHIP);
 
+		if (btrtl_dev->project_id == CHIP_ID_8852A ||
+		    btrtl_dev->project_id == CHIP_ID_8852C)
+			set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_USE_MSFT_EXT_ADDRESS_FILTER, &hdev->quirks);
+
 		hci_set_aosp_capable(hdev);
 		break;
 	default:
diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
index ab2f8f1817cf..5723405b833e 100644
--- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
@@ -309,6 +309,16 @@  enum {
 	 * to support it.
 	 */
 	HCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_SET_RPA_TIMEOUT,
+
+	/* When this quirk is set, MSFT extension monitor tracking by
+	 * address filter is supported. Since tracking quantity of each
+	 * pattern is limited, this feature supports tracking multiple
+	 * devices concurrently if controller supports multiple
+	 * address filters.
+	 *
+	 * This quirk must be set before hci_register_dev is called.
+	 */
+	HCI_QUIRK_USE_MSFT_EXT_ADDRESS_FILTER,
 };
 
 /* HCI device flags */
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/msft.c b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
index bf5cee48916c..b80a2162a5c3 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/msft.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
@@ -91,6 +91,33 @@  struct msft_ev_le_monitor_device {
 struct msft_monitor_advertisement_handle_data {
 	__u8  msft_handle;
 	__u16 mgmt_handle;
+	__s8 rssi_high;
+	__s8 rssi_low;
+	__u8 rssi_low_interval;
+	__u8 rssi_sampling_period;
+	__u8 cond_type;
+	struct list_head list;
+};
+
+enum monitor_addr_filter_state {
+	AF_STATE_IDLE,
+	AF_STATE_ADDING,
+	AF_STATE_ADDED,
+	AF_STATE_REMOVING,
+};
+
+#define MSFT_MONITOR_ADVERTISEMENT_TYPE_ADDR	0x04
+struct msft_monitor_addr_filter_data {
+	__u8     msft_handle;
+	__u8     pattern_handle; /* address filters pertain to */
+	__u16    mgmt_handle;
+	int      state;
+	__s8     rssi_high;
+	__s8     rssi_low;
+	__u8     rssi_low_interval;
+	__u8     rssi_sampling_period;
+	__u8     addr_type;
+	bdaddr_t bdaddr;
 	struct list_head list;
 };
 
@@ -99,9 +126,12 @@  struct msft_data {
 	__u8  evt_prefix_len;
 	__u8  *evt_prefix;
 	struct list_head handle_map;
+	struct list_head address_filters;
 	__u8 resuming;
 	__u8 suspending;
 	__u8 filter_enabled;
+	/* To synchronize add/remove address filter and monitor device event.*/
+	struct mutex filter_lock;
 };
 
 bool msft_monitor_supported(struct hci_dev *hdev)
@@ -180,6 +210,24 @@  static struct msft_monitor_advertisement_handle_data *msft_find_handle_data
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+/* This function requires the caller holds msft->filter_lock */
+static struct msft_monitor_addr_filter_data *msft_find_address_data
+			(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 addr_type, bdaddr_t *addr,
+			 u8 pattern_handle)
+{
+	struct msft_monitor_addr_filter_data *entry;
+	struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(entry, &msft->address_filters, list) {
+		if (entry->pattern_handle == pattern_handle &&
+		    addr_type == entry->addr_type &&
+		    !bacmp(addr, &entry->bdaddr))
+			return entry;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 /* This function requires the caller holds hdev->lock */
 static int msft_monitor_device_del(struct hci_dev *hdev, __u16 mgmt_handle,
 				   bdaddr_t *bdaddr, __u8 addr_type,
@@ -240,6 +288,7 @@  static int msft_le_monitor_advertisement_cb(struct hci_dev *hdev, u16 opcode,
 
 	handle_data->mgmt_handle = monitor->handle;
 	handle_data->msft_handle = rp->handle;
+	handle_data->cond_type   = MSFT_MONITOR_ADVERTISEMENT_TYPE_PATTERN;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&handle_data->list);
 	list_add(&handle_data->list, &msft->handle_map);
 
@@ -254,6 +303,70 @@  static int msft_le_monitor_advertisement_cb(struct hci_dev *hdev, u16 opcode,
 	return status;
 }
 
+/* This function requires the caller holds hci_req_sync_lock */
+static void msft_remove_addr_filters_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 handle)
+{
+	struct msft_monitor_addr_filter_data *address_filter, *n;
+	struct msft_cp_le_cancel_monitor_advertisement cp;
+	struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
+	struct list_head head;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&head);
+
+	/* Cancel all corresponding address monitors */
+	mutex_lock(&msft->filter_lock);
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(address_filter, n, &msft->address_filters,
+				 list) {
+		if (address_filter->pattern_handle != handle)
+			continue;
+
+		list_del(&address_filter->list);
+
+		/* Keep the address filter and let
+		 * msft_add_address_filter_sync() remove and free the address
+		 * filter.
+		 */
+		if (address_filter->state == AF_STATE_ADDING) {
+			address_filter->state = AF_STATE_REMOVING;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/* Keep the address filter and let
+		 * msft_cancel_address_filter_sync() remove and free the address
+		 * filter
+		 */
+		if (address_filter->state == AF_STATE_REMOVING)
+			continue;
+
+		list_add_tail(&address_filter->list, &head);
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&msft->filter_lock);
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(address_filter, n, &head, list) {
+		list_del(&address_filter->list);
+
+		cp.sub_opcode = MSFT_OP_LE_CANCEL_MONITOR_ADVERTISEMENT;
+		cp.handle = address_filter->msft_handle;
+
+		skb = __hci_cmd_sync(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode, sizeof(cp), &cp,
+				     HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT);
+		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(skb)) {
+			kfree(address_filter);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+
+		bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "MSFT: Canceled device %pMR address filter",
+			   &address_filter->bdaddr);
+
+		kfree(address_filter);
+	}
+}
+
 static int msft_le_cancel_monitor_advertisement_cb(struct hci_dev *hdev,
 						   u16 opcode,
 						   struct adv_monitor *monitor,
@@ -263,6 +376,7 @@  static int msft_le_cancel_monitor_advertisement_cb(struct hci_dev *hdev,
 	struct msft_monitor_advertisement_handle_data *handle_data;
 	struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
 	int status = 0;
+	u8 msft_handle;
 
 	rp = (struct msft_rp_le_cancel_monitor_advertisement *)skb->data;
 	if (skb->len < sizeof(*rp)) {
@@ -293,11 +407,17 @@  static int msft_le_cancel_monitor_advertisement_cb(struct hci_dev *hdev,
 						NULL, 0, false);
 		}
 
+		msft_handle = handle_data->msft_handle;
+
 		list_del(&handle_data->list);
 		kfree(handle_data);
-	}
 
-	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
+		hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
+
+		msft_remove_addr_filters_sync(hdev, msft_handle);
+	} else {
+		hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
+	}
 
 done:
 	return status;
@@ -394,12 +514,14 @@  static int msft_add_monitor_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev,
 {
 	struct msft_cp_le_monitor_advertisement *cp;
 	struct msft_le_monitor_advertisement_pattern_data *pattern_data;
+	struct msft_monitor_advertisement_handle_data *handle_data;
 	struct msft_le_monitor_advertisement_pattern *pattern;
 	struct adv_pattern *entry;
 	size_t total_size = sizeof(*cp) + sizeof(*pattern_data);
 	ptrdiff_t offset = 0;
 	u8 pattern_count = 0;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	int err;
 
 	if (!msft_monitor_pattern_valid(monitor))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -436,16 +558,31 @@  static int msft_add_monitor_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev,
 
 	skb = __hci_cmd_sync(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode, total_size, cp,
 			     HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT);
-	kfree(cp);
 
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(skb)) {
-		if (!skb)
-			return -EIO;
-		return PTR_ERR(skb);
+		err = PTR_ERR(skb);
+		goto out_free;
 	}
 
-	return msft_le_monitor_advertisement_cb(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode,
-						monitor, skb);
+	err = msft_le_monitor_advertisement_cb(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode,
+					       monitor, skb);
+	if (err)
+		goto out_free;
+
+	handle_data = msft_find_handle_data(hdev, monitor->handle, true);
+	if (!handle_data) {
+		err = -ENODATA;
+		goto out_free;
+	}
+
+	handle_data->rssi_high	= cp->rssi_high;
+	handle_data->rssi_low	= cp->rssi_low;
+	handle_data->rssi_low_interval	  = cp->rssi_low_interval;
+	handle_data->rssi_sampling_period = cp->rssi_sampling_period;
+
+out_free:
+	kfree(cp);
+	return err;
 }
 
 /* This function requires the caller holds hci_req_sync_lock */
@@ -538,6 +675,7 @@  void msft_do_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)
 {
 	struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
 	struct msft_monitor_advertisement_handle_data *handle_data, *tmp;
+	struct msft_monitor_addr_filter_data *address_filter, *n;
 	struct adv_monitor *monitor;
 
 	if (!msft)
@@ -559,6 +697,14 @@  void msft_do_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)
 		kfree(handle_data);
 	}
 
+	mutex_lock(&msft->filter_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(address_filter, n, &msft->address_filters,
+				 list) {
+		list_del(&address_filter->list);
+		kfree(address_filter);
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&msft->filter_lock);
+
 	hci_dev_lock(hdev);
 
 	/* Clear any devices that are being monitored and notify device lost */
@@ -568,6 +714,49 @@  void msft_do_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)
 	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
 }
 
+static int msft_cancel_address_filter_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data)
+{
+	struct msft_monitor_addr_filter_data *address_filter = data;
+	struct msft_cp_le_cancel_monitor_advertisement cp;
+	struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	if (!msft) {
+		bt_dev_err(hdev, "MSFT: msft data is freed");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	/* The address filter has been removed by hci dev close */
+	if (!test_bit(HCI_UP, &hdev->flags))
+		return 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&msft->filter_lock);
+	list_del(&address_filter->list);
+	mutex_unlock(&msft->filter_lock);
+
+	cp.sub_opcode = MSFT_OP_LE_CANCEL_MONITOR_ADVERTISEMENT;
+	cp.handle = address_filter->msft_handle;
+
+	skb = __hci_cmd_sync(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode, sizeof(cp), &cp,
+			     HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(skb)) {
+		bt_dev_err(hdev, "MSFT: Failed to cancel address (%pMR) filter",
+			   &address_filter->bdaddr);
+		err = EIO;
+		goto done;
+	}
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+
+	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "MSFT: Canceled device %pMR address filter",
+		   &address_filter->bdaddr);
+
+done:
+	kfree(address_filter);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 void msft_register(struct hci_dev *hdev)
 {
 	struct msft_data *msft = NULL;
@@ -581,7 +770,9 @@  void msft_register(struct hci_dev *hdev)
 	}
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msft->handle_map);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msft->address_filters);
 	hdev->msft_data = msft;
+	mutex_init(&msft->filter_lock);
 }
 
 void msft_unregister(struct hci_dev *hdev)
@@ -596,6 +787,7 @@  void msft_unregister(struct hci_dev *hdev)
 	hdev->msft_data = NULL;
 
 	kfree(msft->evt_prefix);
+	mutex_destroy(&msft->filter_lock);
 	kfree(msft);
 }
 
@@ -645,11 +837,149 @@  static void *msft_skb_pull(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return data;
 }
 
+static int msft_add_address_filter_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data)
+{
+	struct msft_monitor_addr_filter_data *address_filter = data;
+	struct msft_rp_le_monitor_advertisement *rp;
+	struct msft_cp_le_monitor_advertisement *cp;
+	struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
+	struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
+	bool remove = false;
+	size_t size;
+
+	if (!msft) {
+		bt_dev_err(hdev, "MSFT: msft data is freed");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	/* The address filter has been removed by hci dev close */
+	if (!test_bit(HCI_UP, &hdev->flags))
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	/* We are safe to use the address filter from now on.
+	 * msft_monitor_device_evt() wouldn't delete this filter because it's
+	 * not been added by now.
+	 * And all other functions that requiring hci_req_sync_lock wouldn't
+	 * touch this filter before this func completes because it's protected
+	 * by hci_req_sync_lock.
+	 */
+
+	if (address_filter->state == AF_STATE_REMOVING) {
+		mutex_lock(&msft->filter_lock);
+		list_del(&address_filter->list);
+		mutex_unlock(&msft->filter_lock);
+		kfree(address_filter);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	size = sizeof(*cp) +
+	       sizeof(address_filter->addr_type) +
+	       sizeof(address_filter->bdaddr);
+	cp = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!cp) {
+		bt_dev_err(hdev, "MSFT: Alloc cmd param err");
+		remove = true;
+		goto done;
+	}
+	cp->sub_opcode           = MSFT_OP_LE_MONITOR_ADVERTISEMENT;
+	cp->rssi_high		 = address_filter->rssi_high;
+	cp->rssi_low		 = address_filter->rssi_low;
+	cp->rssi_low_interval    = address_filter->rssi_low_interval;
+	cp->rssi_sampling_period = address_filter->rssi_sampling_period;
+	cp->cond_type            = MSFT_MONITOR_ADVERTISEMENT_TYPE_ADDR;
+	cp->data[0]              = address_filter->addr_type;
+	memcpy(&cp->data[1], &address_filter->bdaddr,
+	       sizeof(address_filter->bdaddr));
+
+	skb = __hci_cmd_sync(hdev, hdev->msft_opcode, size, cp,
+			     HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(skb)) {
+		bt_dev_err(hdev, "Failed to enable address %pMR filter",
+			   &address_filter->bdaddr);
+		skb = NULL;
+		remove = true;
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	rp = skb_pull_data(skb, sizeof(*rp));
+	if (!rp || rp->sub_opcode != MSFT_OP_LE_MONITOR_ADVERTISEMENT ||
+	    rp->status)
+		remove = true;
+
+done:
+	mutex_lock(&msft->filter_lock);
+
+	if (remove) {
+		bt_dev_warn(hdev, "MSFT: Remove address (%pMR) filter",
+			    &address_filter->bdaddr);
+		list_del(&address_filter->list);
+		kfree(address_filter);
+	} else {
+		address_filter->state = AF_STATE_ADDED;
+		address_filter->msft_handle = rp->handle;
+		bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "MSFT: Address %pMR filter enabled",
+			   &address_filter->bdaddr);
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&msft->filter_lock);
+
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* This function requires the caller holds msft->filter_lock */
+static struct msft_monitor_addr_filter_data *msft_add_address_filter
+		(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 addr_type, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
+		 struct msft_monitor_advertisement_handle_data *handle_data)
+{
+	struct msft_monitor_addr_filter_data *address_filter = NULL;
+	struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
+	int err;
+
+	address_filter = kzalloc(sizeof(*address_filter), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!address_filter)
+		return NULL;
+
+	address_filter->state             = AF_STATE_ADDING;
+	address_filter->msft_handle       = 0xff;
+	address_filter->pattern_handle    = handle_data->msft_handle;
+	address_filter->mgmt_handle       = handle_data->mgmt_handle;
+	address_filter->rssi_high         = handle_data->rssi_high;
+	address_filter->rssi_low          = handle_data->rssi_low;
+	address_filter->rssi_low_interval = handle_data->rssi_low_interval;
+	address_filter->rssi_sampling_period = handle_data->rssi_sampling_period;
+	address_filter->addr_type            = addr_type;
+	bacpy(&address_filter->bdaddr, bdaddr);
+
+	/* With the above AF_STATE_ADDING, duplicated address filter can be
+	 * avoided when receiving monitor device event (found/lost) frequently
+	 * for the same device.
+	 */
+	list_add_tail(&address_filter->list, &msft->address_filters);
+
+	err = hci_cmd_sync_queue(hdev, msft_add_address_filter_sync,
+				 address_filter, NULL);
+	if (err < 0) {
+		bt_dev_err(hdev, "MSFT: Add address %pMR filter err", bdaddr);
+		list_del(&address_filter->list);
+		kfree(address_filter);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "MSFT: Add device %pMR address filter",
+		   &address_filter->bdaddr);
+
+	return address_filter;
+}
+
 /* This function requires the caller holds hdev->lock */
 static void msft_monitor_device_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	struct msft_monitor_addr_filter_data *n, *address_filter = NULL;
 	struct msft_ev_le_monitor_device *ev;
 	struct msft_monitor_advertisement_handle_data *handle_data;
+	struct msft_data *msft = hdev->msft_data;
+	u16 mgmt_handle = 0xffff;
 	u8 addr_type;
 
 	ev = msft_skb_pull(hdev, skb, MSFT_EV_LE_MONITOR_DEVICE, sizeof(*ev));
@@ -662,9 +992,53 @@  static void msft_monitor_device_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		   ev->monitor_state, &ev->bdaddr);
 
 	handle_data = msft_find_handle_data(hdev, ev->monitor_handle, false);
-	if (!handle_data)
+
+	if (!test_bit(HCI_QUIRK_USE_MSFT_EXT_ADDRESS_FILTER, &hdev->quirks)) {
+		if (!handle_data)
+			return;
+		mgmt_handle = handle_data->mgmt_handle;
+		goto report_state;
+	}
+
+	if (handle_data) {
+		/* Don't report any device found/lost event from pattern
+		 * monitors. Pattern monitor always has its address filters for
+		 * tracking devices.
+		 */
+
+		address_filter = msft_find_address_data(hdev, ev->addr_type,
+							&ev->bdaddr,
+							handle_data->msft_handle);
+		if (address_filter)
+			return;
+
+		if (ev->monitor_state && handle_data->cond_type ==
+				MSFT_MONITOR_ADVERTISEMENT_TYPE_PATTERN)
+			msft_add_address_filter(hdev, ev->addr_type,
+						&ev->bdaddr, handle_data);
+
 		return;
+	}
 
+	/* This device event is not from pattern monitor.
+	 * Report it if there is a corresponding address_filter for it.
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry(n, &msft->address_filters, list) {
+		if (n->state == AF_STATE_ADDED &&
+		    n->msft_handle == ev->monitor_handle) {
+			mgmt_handle = n->mgmt_handle;
+			address_filter = n;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!address_filter) {
+		bt_dev_warn(hdev, "MSFT: Unexpected device event %pMR, %u, %u",
+			    &ev->bdaddr, ev->monitor_handle, ev->monitor_state);
+		return;
+	}
+
+report_state:
 	switch (ev->addr_type) {
 	case ADDR_LE_DEV_PUBLIC:
 		addr_type = BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC;
@@ -681,12 +1055,18 @@  static void msft_monitor_device_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (ev->monitor_state)
-		msft_device_found(hdev, &ev->bdaddr, addr_type,
-				  handle_data->mgmt_handle);
-	else
-		msft_device_lost(hdev, &ev->bdaddr, addr_type,
-				 handle_data->mgmt_handle);
+	if (ev->monitor_state) {
+		msft_device_found(hdev, &ev->bdaddr, addr_type, mgmt_handle);
+	} else {
+		if (address_filter && address_filter->state == AF_STATE_ADDED) {
+			address_filter->state = AF_STATE_REMOVING;
+			hci_cmd_sync_queue(hdev,
+					   msft_cancel_address_filter_sync,
+					   address_filter,
+					   NULL);
+		}
+		msft_device_lost(hdev, &ev->bdaddr, addr_type, mgmt_handle);
+	}
 }
 
 void msft_vendor_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -724,7 +1104,9 @@  void msft_vendor_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 	switch (*evt) {
 	case MSFT_EV_LE_MONITOR_DEVICE:
+		mutex_lock(&msft->filter_lock);
 		msft_monitor_device_evt(hdev, skb);
+		mutex_unlock(&msft->filter_lock);
 		break;
 
 	default: