diff mbox series

[net-next,08/10] net: mdio: Remove unnecessary (void*) conversions

Message ID 20230628024517.1440644-1-yunchuan@nfschina.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series Remove unnecessary (void*) conversions | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/apply fail Patch does not apply to net-next

Commit Message

Wu Yunchuan June 28, 2023, 2:45 a.m. UTC
Pointer variables of void * type do not require type cast.

Signed-off-by: wuych <yunchuan@nfschina.com>
---
 drivers/net/mdio/mdio-xgene.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Russell King (Oracle) June 28, 2023, 9:50 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

I think you missed one case:

        if (mdio_id == XGENE_MDIO_RGMII) {
                mdio_bus->read = xgene_mdio_rgmii_read;
                mdio_bus->write = xgene_mdio_rgmii_write;
                mdio_bus->priv = (void __force *)pdata;

This cast using __force is also not required.

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:45:17AM +0800, wuych wrote:
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void xgene_enet_wr_mdio_csr(void __iomem *base_addr,
>  static int xgene_xfi_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id,
>  				int reg, u16 data)
>  {
> -	void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
> +	void __iomem *addr = bus->priv;
>  	int timeout = 100;
>  	u32 status, val;
>  
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int xgene_xfi_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id,
>  
>  static int xgene_xfi_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int reg)
>  {
> -	void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
> +	void __iomem *addr = bus->priv;
>  	u32 data, status, val;
>  	int timeout = 100;

These probably cause Sparse to warn whether or not the cast is there.

Given that in this case, bus->priv is initialised via:

                mdio_bus->priv = (void __force *)pdata->mdio_csr_addr;

I think the simple thing is to _always_ initialise mdio_bus->priv
to point at pdata, and have xgene_xfi_mdio_*() always do:

	struct xgene_mdio_pdata *pdata = bus->priv;
	void __iomem *addr = pdata->mdio_csr_addr;

The extra access will be dwarfed by the time taken to perform the
access.

This change should be made with a separate patch and not combined with
the patch removing the casts in xgene_mdio_rgmii_*().

Thanks.
Wu Yunchuan June 29, 2023, 1:59 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2023/6/28 17:50, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think you missed one case:
>
>          if (mdio_id == XGENE_MDIO_RGMII) {
>                  mdio_bus->read = xgene_mdio_rgmii_read;
>                  mdio_bus->write = xgene_mdio_rgmii_write;
>                  mdio_bus->priv = (void __force *)pdata;
>
> This cast using __force is also not required.
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:45:17AM +0800, wuych wrote:
>> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void xgene_enet_wr_mdio_csr(void __iomem *base_addr,
>>   static int xgene_xfi_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id,
>>   				int reg, u16 data)
>>   {
>> -	void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
>> +	void __iomem *addr = bus->priv;
>>   	int timeout = 100;
>>   	u32 status, val;
>>   
>> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int xgene_xfi_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id,
>>   
>>   static int xgene_xfi_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int reg)
>>   {
>> -	void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
>> +	void __iomem *addr = bus->priv;
>>   	u32 data, status, val;
>>   	int timeout = 100;
> These probably cause Sparse to warn whether or not the cast is there.

Hi, Russell King,

I didn't notice this Sparse warning.
Should I remove this cast although it cause Sparse warning?
>
> Given that in this case, bus->priv is initialised via:
>
>                  mdio_bus->priv = (void __force *)pdata->mdio_csr_addr;
>
> I think the simple thing is to _always_ initialise mdio_bus->priv
> to point at pdata, and have xgene_xfi_mdio_*() always do:
>
> 	struct xgene_mdio_pdata *pdata = bus->priv;
> 	void __iomem *addr = pdata->mdio_csr_addr;
>
> The extra access will be dwarfed by the time taken to perform the
> access.
>
> This change should be made with a separate patch and not combined with
> the patch removing the casts in xgene_mdio_rgmii_*().
yeah, this change is great.
I will send a separate patch as your suggestion If we can ignore Sparse 
warning.
Thanks for your suggestion!

wuych

>
> Thanks.
>
Dan Carpenter June 29, 2023, 5:50 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:59:56AM +0800, yunchuan wrote:
> On 2023/6/28 17:50, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:45:17AM +0800, wuych wrote:
> > > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void xgene_enet_wr_mdio_csr(void __iomem *base_addr,
> > >   static int xgene_xfi_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id,
> > >   				int reg, u16 data)
> > >   {
> > > -	void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
> > > +	void __iomem *addr = bus->priv;
> > >   	int timeout = 100;
> > >   	u32 status, val;
> > > @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int xgene_xfi_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id,
> > >   static int xgene_xfi_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int reg)
> > >   {
> > > -	void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
> > > +	void __iomem *addr = bus->priv;
> > >   	u32 data, status, val;
> > >   	int timeout = 100;
> > These probably cause Sparse to warn whether or not the cast is there.
> 
> Hi, Russell King,
> 
> I didn't notice this Sparse warning.
> Should I remove this cast although it cause Sparse warning?

No.  Don't introduce new Sparse warnings.

regards,
dan carpenter
Wu Yunchuan June 29, 2023, 6:19 a.m. UTC | #4
On 2023/6/29 13:50, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:59:56AM +0800, yunchuan wrote:
>> On 2023/6/28 17:50, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:45:17AM +0800, wuych wrote:
>>>> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void xgene_enet_wr_mdio_csr(void __iomem *base_addr,
>>>>    static int xgene_xfi_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id,
>>>>    				int reg, u16 data)
>>>>    {
>>>> -	void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
>>>> +	void __iomem *addr = bus->priv;
>>>>    	int timeout = 100;
>>>>    	u32 status, val;
>>>> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int xgene_xfi_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id,
>>>>    static int xgene_xfi_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int reg)
>>>>    {
>>>> -	void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
>>>> +	void __iomem *addr = bus->priv;
>>>>    	u32 data, status, val;
>>>>    	int timeout = 100;
>>> These probably cause Sparse to warn whether or not the cast is there.
>> Hi, Russell King,
>>
>> I didn't notice this Sparse warning.
>> Should I remove this cast although it cause Sparse warning?
> No.  Don't introduce new Sparse warnings.

Got it, thanks for your answer!

wuych

>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-xgene.c b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-xgene.c
index 7aafc221b5cf..aa79464c9d6d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-xgene.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-xgene.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(xgene_mdio_wr_mac);
 
 int xgene_mdio_rgmii_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int reg)
 {
-	struct xgene_mdio_pdata *pdata = (struct xgene_mdio_pdata *)bus->priv;
+	struct xgene_mdio_pdata *pdata = bus->priv;
 	u32 data, done;
 	u8 wait = 10;
 
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(xgene_mdio_rgmii_read);
 
 int xgene_mdio_rgmii_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int reg, u16 data)
 {
-	struct xgene_mdio_pdata *pdata = (struct xgene_mdio_pdata *)bus->priv;
+	struct xgene_mdio_pdata *pdata = bus->priv;
 	u32 val, done;
 	u8 wait = 10;
 
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@  static void xgene_enet_wr_mdio_csr(void __iomem *base_addr,
 static int xgene_xfi_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id,
 				int reg, u16 data)
 {
-	void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
+	void __iomem *addr = bus->priv;
 	int timeout = 100;
 	u32 status, val;
 
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@  static int xgene_xfi_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id,
 
 static int xgene_xfi_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int reg)
 {
-	void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
+	void __iomem *addr = bus->priv;
 	u32 data, status, val;
 	int timeout = 100;