Message ID | 168904151104.2908673.8401909922292791503.stgit@mhiramat.roam.corp.google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | tracing/probes: Fix bugs in process_fetch_insn | expand |
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:11:51 +0900 "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe_tmpl.h > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe_tmpl.h > @@ -267,9 +267,7 @@ store_trace_args(void *data, struct trace_probe *tp, void *rec, > if (unlikely(arg->dynamic)) > *dl = make_data_loc(maxlen, dyndata - base); > ret = process_fetch_insn(arg->code, rec, dl, base); > - if (unlikely(ret < 0 && arg->dynamic)) { > - *dl = make_data_loc(0, dyndata - base); > - } else { > + if (unlikely(ret > 0 && arg->dynamic)) { To match the current code, that should be: if (likely(ret >= 0 || !arg->dynamic)) { But I'm guessing that the original code was buggy, as the else block should only have been processed if arg->dynamic was set? That is, it should have been: if (arg->dynamic) { if (unlikely(ret < 0)) { *dl = make_data_loc(0, dyndata - base); } else { dyndata += ret; maxlen -= ret; } } I guess you only want to update if arg->dynamic is true (even though that wasn't the case before :-/) But in any case, I think you want likely() and not unlikely(). if (arg->dynamic && likely(ret > 0)) { That is, if we only want to updated this if the arg is dynamic. And I don't think that the arg->dynamic() should have likely/unlikely around it, as that's determined by user space, and the kernel should not be adding assumptions about what user space wants. -- Steve > dyndata += ret; > maxlen -= ret; > }
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 23:34:00 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:11:51 +0900 > "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe_tmpl.h > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe_tmpl.h > > @@ -267,9 +267,7 @@ store_trace_args(void *data, struct trace_probe *tp, void *rec, > > if (unlikely(arg->dynamic)) > > *dl = make_data_loc(maxlen, dyndata - base); > > ret = process_fetch_insn(arg->code, rec, dl, base); > > - if (unlikely(ret < 0 && arg->dynamic)) { > > - *dl = make_data_loc(0, dyndata - base); > > - } else { > > + if (unlikely(ret > 0 && arg->dynamic)) { > > To match the current code, that should be: > > if (likely(ret >= 0 || !arg->dynamic)) { > > But I'm guessing that the original code was buggy, as the else block should > only have been processed if arg->dynamic was set? Good point, yes, that's right. Since dyndata and maxlen is only used when arg->dynamic == true, we don't have to care about that. > That is, it should have been: > > if (arg->dynamic) { > if (unlikely(ret < 0)) { > *dl = make_data_loc(0, dyndata - base); > } else { > dyndata += ret; > maxlen -= ret; > } > } > > > I guess you only want to update if arg->dynamic is true (even though that > wasn't the case before :-/) But in any case, I think you want likely() and > not unlikely(). > > if (arg->dynamic && likely(ret > 0)) { > > That is, if we only want to updated this if the arg is dynamic. Indeed. > > And I don't think that the arg->dynamic() should have likely/unlikely > around it, as that's determined by user space, and the kernel should not be > adding assumptions about what user space wants. OK. Let me fix that with a new patch because it is another bug. Thanks, > > -- Steve > > > dyndata += ret; > > maxlen -= ret; > > }
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe_kernel.h b/kernel/trace/trace_probe_kernel.h index 6deae2ce34f8..bb723eefd7b7 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe_kernel.h +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe_kernel.h @@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ fetch_store_strlen(unsigned long addr) return (ret < 0) ? ret : len; } +static nokprobe_inline void set_data_loc(int ret, void *dest, void *__dest, void *base) +{ + if (ret < 0) + ret = 0; + *(u32 *)dest = make_data_loc(ret, __dest - base); +} + /* * Fetch a null-terminated string from user. Caller MUST set *(u32 *)buf * with max length and relative data location. @@ -55,8 +62,7 @@ fetch_store_string_user(unsigned long addr, void *dest, void *base) __dest = get_loc_data(dest, base); ret = strncpy_from_user_nofault(__dest, uaddr, maxlen); - if (ret >= 0) - *(u32 *)dest = make_data_loc(ret, __dest - base); + set_data_loc(ret, dest, __dest, base); return ret; } @@ -87,8 +93,7 @@ fetch_store_string(unsigned long addr, void *dest, void *base) * probing. */ ret = strncpy_from_kernel_nofault(__dest, (void *)addr, maxlen); - if (ret >= 0) - *(u32 *)dest = make_data_loc(ret, __dest - base); + set_data_loc(ret, dest, __dest, base); return ret; } diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe_tmpl.h b/kernel/trace/trace_probe_tmpl.h index ed9d57c6b041..bbad0503f166 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe_tmpl.h +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe_tmpl.h @@ -267,9 +267,7 @@ store_trace_args(void *data, struct trace_probe *tp, void *rec, if (unlikely(arg->dynamic)) *dl = make_data_loc(maxlen, dyndata - base); ret = process_fetch_insn(arg->code, rec, dl, base); - if (unlikely(ret < 0 && arg->dynamic)) { - *dl = make_data_loc(0, dyndata - base); - } else { + if (unlikely(ret > 0 && arg->dynamic)) { dyndata += ret; maxlen -= ret; } diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c index 8b92e34ff0c8..7b47e9a2c010 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c @@ -170,7 +170,8 @@ fetch_store_string(unsigned long addr, void *dest, void *base) */ ret++; *(u32 *)dest = make_data_loc(ret, (void *)dst - base); - } + } else + *(u32 *)dest = make_data_loc(0, (void *)dst - base); return ret; }