| Message ID | 20230712064832.44188-1-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [-next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err() | expand |
Il 12/07/23 08:48, Yang Li ha scritto: > There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a > custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq() > or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an > appropriate error message in case of a failure. > > ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> > Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846 > Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:48:32PM +0800, Yang Li wrote: > There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a > custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq() > or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an > appropriate error message in case of a failure. > > ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> > Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846 Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 02:11:23PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:48:32PM +0800, Yang Li wrote: > > There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a > > custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq() > > or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an > > appropriate error message in case of a failure. > > > > ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error > > > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> > > Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846 > > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Sorry for this, I didn't mean to ack this patch, no idea how on earth I managed to do that (must be some wrong key combination in my email client) but I wanted and meant to ack only this [1]. Sorry for the noise.
Yang, > There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a > custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq() > or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an > appropriate error message in case of a failure. Applied to 6.6/scsi-staging, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c index 786b1469eb52..b499eade957e 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c @@ -861,7 +861,6 @@ static void ufs_mtk_init_mcq_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba) irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i + 1); if (irq < 0) { host->mcq_intr_info[i].irq = MTK_MCQ_INVALID_IRQ; - dev_err(hba->dev, "get platform mcq irq fail: %d\n", i); goto failed; } host->mcq_intr_info[i].hba = hba;
There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq() or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an appropriate error message in case of a failure. ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846 Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)