@@ -728,9 +728,9 @@ static int k3_dma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *chan)
dev_dbg(d->slave.dev, "vchan %p: terminate all\n", &c->vc);
/* Prevent this channel being scheduled */
- spin_lock(&d->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&d->lock, flags);
list_del_init(&c->node);
- spin_unlock(&d->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&d->lock, flags);
/* Clear the tx descriptor lists */
spin_lock_irqsave(&c->vc.lock, flags);
@@ -764,6 +764,7 @@ static int k3_dma_transfer_pause(struct dma_chan *chan)
struct k3_dma_chan *c = to_k3_chan(chan);
struct k3_dma_dev *d = to_k3_dma(chan->device);
struct k3_dma_phy *p = c->phy;
+ unsigned long flags;
dev_dbg(d->slave.dev, "vchan %p: pause\n", &c->vc);
if (c->status == DMA_IN_PROGRESS) {
@@ -771,9 +772,9 @@ static int k3_dma_transfer_pause(struct dma_chan *chan)
if (p) {
k3_dma_pause_dma(p, false);
} else {
- spin_lock(&d->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&d->lock, flags);
list_del_init(&c->node);
- spin_unlock(&d->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&d->lock, flags);
}
}
As &d->lock is acquired by the tasklet k3_dma_tasklet() under softirq context, other process context code acquring the lock should disable irq or at least bottom-half irq. The dma terminate callback k3_dma_terminate_all() and pause callback k3_dma_transfer_pause() acquire the same lock but without closing irq. I am not sure whether the two callbacks are already irq close in the core, if not, then it would have the following deadlocks. But I saw a spin_lock_irq() or another lock inside the terminate callback so I guess not. Possible deadlock scenario: k3_dma_transfer_pause() -> spin_lock(&d->lock) <tasklet interrupt> -> k3_dma_tasklet() -> spin_lock_irq(&d->lock) (deadlock here) This flaw was found using an experimental static analysis tool we are developing for irq-related deadlock. The tentative patch fix the potential deadlock by spin_lock_irqsave(), or it can be spin_lock_bh() if should be fixed? Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com> --- drivers/dma/k3dma.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)