| Message ID | 20230801020206.1957986-1-zhaotianrui@loongson.cn (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | selftests: kvm: Add LoongArch support | expand |
Please use "KVM: selftests:" for the scope. There's no "official" requirement, but I've been heavily pushing "KVM: selftests:" and no one has objected or suggested an alternative, and I'd really like all of KVM selftests to use a consistent scope. On Tue, Aug 01, 2023, Tianrui Zhao wrote: > This patch series base on the Linux LoongArch KVM patch: > Based-on: <20230720062813.4126751-1-zhaotianrui@loongson.cn> Is there an actual dependency? I ask because I'm shepherding along a series[*] that will silently conflict with the ucall support, and in a way with the Makefile changes. If there's no hard dependency, one option would be take this series through kvm-x86/selftests (my topic branch for KVM selftests changes) along with the guest printf series, e.g. so that we don't end up with a mess in linux-next and/or come the 6.6 merge window. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230731203026.1192091-1-seanjc@google.com > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 11 + > .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h | 5 + > .../kvm/include/loongarch/processor.h | 28 ++ > .../selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/sysreg.h | 89 +++++ > .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/exception.S | 27 ++ > .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/processor.c | 367 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/ucall.c | 44 +++ > 7 files changed, 571 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/processor.h > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/sysreg.h > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/exception.S > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/processor.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/ucall.c > > -- > 2.39.1 >
在 2023/8/3 上午12:58, Sean Christopherson 写道: > Please use "KVM: selftests:" for the scope. There's no "official" requirement, > but I've been heavily pushing "KVM: selftests:" and no one has objected or > suggested an alternative, and I'd really like all of KVM selftests to use a > consistent scope. Thanks for your reviewing. I will replace all the "selftests: kvm:" with "KVM: selftests:". > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023, Tianrui Zhao wrote: >> This patch series base on the Linux LoongArch KVM patch: >> Based-on: <20230720062813.4126751-1-zhaotianrui@loongson.cn> > Is there an actual dependency? I ask because I'm shepherding along a series[*] > that will silently conflict with the ucall support, and in a way with the Makefile > changes. Yes, this KVM selftests patch series actually depend on the previous LoongArch KVM patches. Thanks Tianrui Zhao > > If there's no hard dependency, one option would be take this series through > kvm-x86/selftests (my topic branch for KVM selftests changes) along with the > guest printf series, e.g. so that we don't end up with a mess in linux-next and/or > come the 6.6 merge window. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230731203026.1192091-1-seanjc@google.com > >> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 11 + >> .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h | 5 + >> .../kvm/include/loongarch/processor.h | 28 ++ >> .../selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/sysreg.h | 89 +++++ >> .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/exception.S | 27 ++ >> .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/processor.c | 367 ++++++++++++++++++ >> .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/ucall.c | 44 +++ >> 7 files changed, 571 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/processor.h >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/sysreg.h >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/exception.S >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/processor.c >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/ucall.c >> >> -- >> 2.39.1 >>