Message ID | 20230803182038.2646541-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | page_pool: a couple of assorted optimizations | expand |
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 20:20:32 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > That initially was a spin-off of the IAVF PP series[0], but has grown > (and shrunk) since then a bunch. In fact, it consists of three > semi-independent blocks: > > * #1-2: Compile-time optimization. Split page_pool.h into 2 headers to > not overbloat the consumers not needing complex inline helpers and > then stop including it in skbuff.h at all. The first patch is also > prereq for the whole series. > * #3: Improve cacheline locality for users of the Page Pool frag API. > * #4-6: Use direct cache recycling more aggressively, when it is safe > obviously. In addition, make sure nobody wants to use Page Pool API > with disabled interrupts. > > Patches #1 and #5 are authored by Yunsheng and Jakub respectively, with > small modifications from my side as per ML discussions. > For the perf numbers for #3-6, please see individual commit messages. Our scheming didn't help much, the series also conflicts with the net/xdp.h includes which came in via bpf-next :(
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:21:21 -0700 > On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 20:20:32 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote: >> That initially was a spin-off of the IAVF PP series[0], but has grown >> (and shrunk) since then a bunch. In fact, it consists of three >> semi-independent blocks: >> >> * #1-2: Compile-time optimization. Split page_pool.h into 2 headers to >> not overbloat the consumers not needing complex inline helpers and >> then stop including it in skbuff.h at all. The first patch is also >> prereq for the whole series. >> * #3: Improve cacheline locality for users of the Page Pool frag API. >> * #4-6: Use direct cache recycling more aggressively, when it is safe >> obviously. In addition, make sure nobody wants to use Page Pool API >> with disabled interrupts. >> >> Patches #1 and #5 are authored by Yunsheng and Jakub respectively, with >> small modifications from my side as per ML discussions. >> For the perf numbers for #3-6, please see individual commit messages. > > Our scheming didn't help much, the series also conflicts > with the net/xdp.h includes which came in via bpf-next :( Haha that happens. I rechecked everything before sending, but well, we need a spinlock or what :D I'll send v4 in a couple hours, so that ~22 hrs will pass since v3, sounds okay? Thanks, Olek