Message ID | 20230809235622.1664227-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF in hci_disconnect_all_sync | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
tedd_an/pre-ci_am | success | Success |
tedd_an/CheckPatch | success | CheckPatch PASS |
tedd_an/GitLint | success | Gitlint PASS |
tedd_an/SubjectPrefix | success | Gitlint PASS |
tedd_an/BuildKernel | success | BuildKernel PASS |
tedd_an/CheckAllWarning | success | CheckAllWarning PASS |
tedd_an/CheckSparse | success | CheckSparse PASS |
tedd_an/CheckSmatch | success | CheckSparse PASS |
tedd_an/BuildKernel32 | success | BuildKernel32 PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunnerSetup | success | TestRunnerSetup PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_l2cap-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_iso-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_bnep-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_mgmt-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_rfcomm-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_sco-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_ioctl-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_mesh-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_smp-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_userchan-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/IncrementalBuild | success | Incremental Build PASS |
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=774728 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PASS 0.73 seconds GitLint PASS 0.34 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.13 seconds BuildKernel PASS 34.17 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 36.99 seconds CheckSparse PASS 42.33 seconds CheckSmatch PASS 114.33 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 32.77 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 497.41 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 24.07 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 48.08 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 10.83 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 217.70 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 16.31 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 19.30 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 18.36 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 13.48 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 14.60 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 11.31 seconds IncrementalBuild PASS 30.92 seconds --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth
Hi Pauli, On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 6:17 PM <bluez.test.bot@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! > > Dear submitter, > > Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. > This is a CI test results with your patch series: > PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=774728 > > ---Test result--- > > Test Summary: > CheckPatch PASS 0.73 seconds > GitLint PASS 0.34 seconds > SubjectPrefix PASS 0.13 seconds > BuildKernel PASS 34.17 seconds > CheckAllWarning PASS 36.99 seconds > CheckSparse PASS 42.33 seconds > CheckSmatch PASS 114.33 seconds > BuildKernel32 PASS 32.77 seconds > TestRunnerSetup PASS 497.41 seconds > TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 24.07 seconds > TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 48.08 seconds > TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 10.83 seconds > TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 217.70 seconds > TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 16.31 seconds > TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 19.30 seconds > TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 18.36 seconds > TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 13.48 seconds > TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 14.60 seconds > TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 11.31 seconds > IncrementalBuild PASS 30.92 seconds Any comments on this one? Perhaps we should add a test for it as well since I don't think it was reproducible with the existing tests.
Hi Luiz, ke, 2023-08-09 kello 16:56 -0700, Luiz Augusto von Dentz kirjoitti: > From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> > > Use-after-free can occur in hci_disconnect_all_sync if a connection is > deleted by concurrent processing of a controller event. > > To prevent this the code now tries to iterate over the list backwards > to ensure the links are cleanup before its parents, also it no longer > relies on a cursor, instead it always uses the last element since > hci_abort_conn_sync is guaranteed to call hci_conn_del. > > UAF crash log: > ================================================================== > BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hci_set_powered_sync > (net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c:5424) [bluetooth] > Read of size 8 at addr ffff888009d9c000 by task kworker/u9:0/124 > > CPU: 0 PID: 124 Comm: kworker/u9:0 Tainted: G W > 6.5.0-rc1+ #10 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS > 1.16.2-1.fc38 04/01/2014 > Workqueue: hci0 hci_cmd_sync_work [bluetooth] > Call Trace: > <TASK> > dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x90 > print_report+0xcf/0x670 > ? __virt_addr_valid+0xdd/0x160 > ? hci_set_powered_sync+0x2c9/0x4a0 [bluetooth] > kasan_report+0xa6/0xe0 > ? hci_set_powered_sync+0x2c9/0x4a0 [bluetooth] > ? __pfx_set_powered_sync+0x10/0x10 [bluetooth] > hci_set_powered_sync+0x2c9/0x4a0 [bluetooth] > ? __pfx_hci_set_powered_sync+0x10/0x10 [bluetooth] > ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 > ? __pfx_set_powered_sync+0x10/0x10 [bluetooth] > hci_cmd_sync_work+0x137/0x220 [bluetooth] > process_one_work+0x526/0x9d0 > ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10 > ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 > ? mark_held_locks+0x1a/0x90 > worker_thread+0x92/0x630 > ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 > kthread+0x196/0x1e0 > ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 > </TASK> > > Allocated by task 1782: > kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 > kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 > __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0 > hci_conn_add+0xa5/0xa80 [bluetooth] > hci_bind_cis+0x881/0x9b0 [bluetooth] > iso_connect_cis+0x121/0x520 [bluetooth] > iso_sock_connect+0x3f6/0x790 [bluetooth] > __sys_connect+0x109/0x130 > __x64_sys_connect+0x40/0x50 > do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 > > Freed by task 695: > kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 > kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 > kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x50 > __kasan_slab_free+0x10a/0x180 > __kmem_cache_free+0x14d/0x2e0 > device_release+0x5d/0xf0 > kobject_put+0xdf/0x270 > hci_disconn_complete_evt+0x274/0x3a0 [bluetooth] > hci_event_packet+0x579/0x7e0 [bluetooth] > hci_rx_work+0x287/0xaa0 [bluetooth] > process_one_work+0x526/0x9d0 > worker_thread+0x92/0x630 > kthread+0x196/0x1e0 > ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 > ================================================================== > > Fixes: 182ee45da083 ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Rework hci_suspend_notifier") > Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> > Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> > --- > net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c > index 32fa9006f381..234da30292a4 100644 > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c > @@ -5429,7 +5429,11 @@ int hci_abort_conn_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, u8 reason) > hci_dev_unlock(hdev); > return 0; > default: > + hci_dev_lock(hdev); > conn->state = BT_CLOSED; > + hci_disconn_cfm(conn, reason); > + hci_conn_del(conn); > + hci_dev_unlock(hdev); > return 0; > } When powering off we do not wait for the Disconnection_Complete or Connection_Complete events from disconnect/cancel, but only the command status. In these cases it looks like hci_abort_conn_sync returns while the conn still exists. Then the command may get sent again. If the controller rejects the second disconnect/cancel command with error status then conn probably gets deleted on second round (kprinting errors), otherwise it loops here waiting until the conn goes away. LE connection cancel maybe busy-loops here forever until the connection completion event arrives, because of the HCI_CONN_CANCEL flag test, negating the point of not waiting for that event. Maybe hci_conn_abort_conn_sync should do the "if (err) { ..." cleanup unconditionally also when err = 0? This might get the state out of sync with controller when powering off, if the power off gets canceled after this. OTOH, we probably would be deleting the conns anyway when the connection completion events from the successful commands arrive, so maybe this doesn't matter and one can think it through. Tests would indeed be nice here... > > @@ -5458,13 +5462,19 @@ int hci_abort_conn_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, u8 reason) > > static int hci_disconnect_all_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 reason) > { > - struct hci_conn *conn, *tmp; > - int err; > + struct list_head *head = &hdev->conn_hash.list; > > - list_for_each_entry_safe(conn, tmp, &hdev->conn_hash.list, list) { > - err = hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); > - if (err) > - return err; > + /* Use reverse order so links are cleanup before parents */ I suspect the ordering may be either way: you can have a pre-existing ACL connection when ISO is connected, or use something like ISO BT_DEFER_SETUP and then hci_connect_cis may create the ACL after ISO. In iso-tester tests it's probably the latter and with real BAP the former (but didn't actually check it now, too late for today). Maybe iterating the struct hci_link is OK here, it's probably still fairly simple. A big simplification came from having hci_abort_conn delete always and not bailing out from disconnect_all_sync loop on errors. > + while (!list_empty(&hdev->conn_hash.list)) { > + struct hci_conn *conn = list_last_entry(head, struct hci_conn, > + list); > + > + /* Disregard possible errors since hci_conn_del shall have been > + * called even in case of errors had occurred since it would > + * then cause hci_conn_failed to be called which calls > + * hci_conn_del internally. > + */ > + hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); > } I think to be UAF-safe the list iteration must either hold rcu_read_lock and use RCU primitives, or, hold hdev->lock and use usual list primitives. In both cases it should take hci_conn_get to prevent concurrent hci_conn_del freeing the conn before hci_abort_conn_sync is finished accessing its fields. rcu_read_lock(); while ((conn = list_first_or_null_rcu(...)) { conn = /* one of conn->links if any, otherwise conn */ hci_conn_get(conn); rcu_read_unlock(); hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); hci_conn_put(conn); /* must be before rcu_read_lock */ rcu_read_lock(); } rcu_read_unlock(); or with *rcu* -> hdev->lock. Not using RCU primitives or hdev->lock is probably not safe even if hci_conn_del is prevented from running concurrently by future changes in hci_sync, because there may be concurrent list_add_rcu and you can't know if compiler generated concurrency safe code from the non-RCU list iteration primitives here. > > return 0;
Hi Pauli, On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 1:55 PM Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> wrote: > > Hi Luiz, > > ke, 2023-08-09 kello 16:56 -0700, Luiz Augusto von Dentz kirjoitti: > > From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> > > > > Use-after-free can occur in hci_disconnect_all_sync if a connection is > > deleted by concurrent processing of a controller event. > > > > To prevent this the code now tries to iterate over the list backwards > > to ensure the links are cleanup before its parents, also it no longer > > relies on a cursor, instead it always uses the last element since > > hci_abort_conn_sync is guaranteed to call hci_conn_del. > > > > UAF crash log: > > ================================================================== > > BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hci_set_powered_sync > > (net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c:5424) [bluetooth] > > Read of size 8 at addr ffff888009d9c000 by task kworker/u9:0/124 > > > > CPU: 0 PID: 124 Comm: kworker/u9:0 Tainted: G W > > 6.5.0-rc1+ #10 > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS > > 1.16.2-1.fc38 04/01/2014 > > Workqueue: hci0 hci_cmd_sync_work [bluetooth] > > Call Trace: > > <TASK> > > dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x90 > > print_report+0xcf/0x670 > > ? __virt_addr_valid+0xdd/0x160 > > ? hci_set_powered_sync+0x2c9/0x4a0 [bluetooth] > > kasan_report+0xa6/0xe0 > > ? hci_set_powered_sync+0x2c9/0x4a0 [bluetooth] > > ? __pfx_set_powered_sync+0x10/0x10 [bluetooth] > > hci_set_powered_sync+0x2c9/0x4a0 [bluetooth] > > ? __pfx_hci_set_powered_sync+0x10/0x10 [bluetooth] > > ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 > > ? __pfx_set_powered_sync+0x10/0x10 [bluetooth] > > hci_cmd_sync_work+0x137/0x220 [bluetooth] > > process_one_work+0x526/0x9d0 > > ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10 > > ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 > > ? mark_held_locks+0x1a/0x90 > > worker_thread+0x92/0x630 > > ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 > > kthread+0x196/0x1e0 > > ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > > ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 > > </TASK> > > > > Allocated by task 1782: > > kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 > > kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 > > __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0 > > hci_conn_add+0xa5/0xa80 [bluetooth] > > hci_bind_cis+0x881/0x9b0 [bluetooth] > > iso_connect_cis+0x121/0x520 [bluetooth] > > iso_sock_connect+0x3f6/0x790 [bluetooth] > > __sys_connect+0x109/0x130 > > __x64_sys_connect+0x40/0x50 > > do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90 > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 > > > > Freed by task 695: > > kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 > > kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 > > kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x50 > > __kasan_slab_free+0x10a/0x180 > > __kmem_cache_free+0x14d/0x2e0 > > device_release+0x5d/0xf0 > > kobject_put+0xdf/0x270 > > hci_disconn_complete_evt+0x274/0x3a0 [bluetooth] > > hci_event_packet+0x579/0x7e0 [bluetooth] > > hci_rx_work+0x287/0xaa0 [bluetooth] > > process_one_work+0x526/0x9d0 > > worker_thread+0x92/0x630 > > kthread+0x196/0x1e0 > > ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 > > ================================================================== > > > > Fixes: 182ee45da083 ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Rework hci_suspend_notifier") > > Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> > > Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> > > --- > > net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c > > index 32fa9006f381..234da30292a4 100644 > > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c > > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c > > @@ -5429,7 +5429,11 @@ int hci_abort_conn_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, u8 reason) > > hci_dev_unlock(hdev); > > return 0; > > default: > > + hci_dev_lock(hdev); > > conn->state = BT_CLOSED; > > + hci_disconn_cfm(conn, reason); > > + hci_conn_del(conn); > > + hci_dev_unlock(hdev); > > return 0; > > } > > When powering off we do not wait for the Disconnection_Complete or > Connection_Complete events from disconnect/cancel, but only the command > status. > > In these cases it looks like hci_abort_conn_sync returns while the conn > still exists. Then the command may get sent again. If the controller > rejects the second disconnect/cancel command with error status then > conn probably gets deleted on second round (kprinting errors), > otherwise it loops here waiting until the conn goes away. > > LE connection cancel maybe busy-loops here forever until the connection > completion event arrives, because of the HCI_CONN_CANCEL flag test, > negating the point of not waiting for that event. > > Maybe hci_conn_abort_conn_sync should do the "if (err) { ..." cleanup > unconditionally also when err = 0? This might get the state out of sync > with controller when powering off, if the power off gets canceled after > this. OTOH, we probably would be deleting the conns anyway when the > connection completion events from the successful commands arrive, so > maybe this doesn't matter and one can think it through. Yep, I tried to address this on v2 > Tests would indeed be nice here... Perhaps we need to update the suspend test to actually have connections to cleanup. > > > > @@ -5458,13 +5462,19 @@ int hci_abort_conn_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, u8 reason) > > > > static int hci_disconnect_all_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 reason) > > { > > - struct hci_conn *conn, *tmp; > > - int err; > > + struct list_head *head = &hdev->conn_hash.list; > > > > - list_for_each_entry_safe(conn, tmp, &hdev->conn_hash.list, list) { > > - err = hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); > > - if (err) > > - return err; > > + /* Use reverse order so links are cleanup before parents */ > > I suspect the ordering may be either way: you can have a pre-existing > ACL connection when ISO is connected, or use something like ISO > BT_DEFER_SETUP and then hci_connect_cis may create the ACL after ISO. > > In iso-tester tests it's probably the latter and with real BAP the > former (but didn't actually check it now, too late for today). > > Maybe iterating the struct hci_link is OK here, it's probably still > fairly simple. > > A big simplification came from having hci_abort_conn delete always and > not bailing out from disconnect_all_sync loop on errors. > > > + while (!list_empty(&hdev->conn_hash.list)) { > > + struct hci_conn *conn = list_last_entry(head, struct hci_conn, > > + list); > > + > > + /* Disregard possible errors since hci_conn_del shall have been > > + * called even in case of errors had occurred since it would > > + * then cause hci_conn_failed to be called which calls > > + * hci_conn_del internally. > > + */ > > + hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); > > } > > I think to be UAF-safe the list iteration must either hold > rcu_read_lock and use RCU primitives, or, hold hdev->lock and use usual > list primitives. > > In both cases it should take hci_conn_get to prevent concurrent > hci_conn_del freeing the conn before hci_abort_conn_sync is finished > accessing its fields. > > rcu_read_lock(); > while ((conn = list_first_or_null_rcu(...)) { > conn = /* one of conn->links if any, otherwise conn */ > hci_conn_get(conn); > rcu_read_unlock(); > hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); > hci_conn_put(conn); /* must be before rcu_read_lock */ > rcu_read_lock(); > } > rcu_read_unlock(); > > or with *rcu* -> hdev->lock. > > Not using RCU primitives or hdev->lock is probably not safe even if > hci_conn_del is prevented from running concurrently by future changes > in hci_sync, because there may be concurrent list_add_rcu and you can't > know if compiler generated concurrency safe code from the non-RCU list > iteration primitives here. Added something similar to v2. > > > > return 0; > > -- > Pauli Virtanen
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c index 32fa9006f381..234da30292a4 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c @@ -5429,7 +5429,11 @@ int hci_abort_conn_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, u8 reason) hci_dev_unlock(hdev); return 0; default: + hci_dev_lock(hdev); conn->state = BT_CLOSED; + hci_disconn_cfm(conn, reason); + hci_conn_del(conn); + hci_dev_unlock(hdev); return 0; } @@ -5458,13 +5462,19 @@ int hci_abort_conn_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, u8 reason) static int hci_disconnect_all_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 reason) { - struct hci_conn *conn, *tmp; - int err; + struct list_head *head = &hdev->conn_hash.list; - list_for_each_entry_safe(conn, tmp, &hdev->conn_hash.list, list) { - err = hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); - if (err) - return err; + /* Use reverse order so links are cleanup before parents */ + while (!list_empty(&hdev->conn_hash.list)) { + struct hci_conn *conn = list_last_entry(head, struct hci_conn, + list); + + /* Disregard possible errors since hci_conn_del shall have been + * called even in case of errors had occurred since it would + * then cause hci_conn_failed to be called which calls + * hci_conn_del internally. + */ + hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); } return 0;