diff mbox series

[bpf-next] selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: optimize kallsyms cache

Message ID tencent_AB461510B10CD484E0B2F62E3754165F2909@qq.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: optimize kallsyms cache | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 23 of 23 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 191 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc

Commit Message

Rong Tao Aug. 10, 2023, 3:14 p.m. UTC
From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>

Static ksyms often have problems because the number of symbols exceeds the
MAX_SYMS limit. Like changing the MAX_SYMS from 300000 to 400000 in
commit e76a014334a6("selftests/bpf: Bump and validate MAX_SYMS") solves
the problem somewhat, but it's not the perfect way.

This commit uses dynamic memory allocation, which completely solves the
problem caused by the limitation of the number of kallsyms.

Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
---
 samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c                |  1 +
 samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c                   |  1 +
 samples/bpf/spintest_user.c                   |  1 +
 samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c              |  1 +
 samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c                |  1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c     |  1 +
 .../bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c         |  1 +
 .../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c        |  2 +
 .../prog_tests/kprobe_multi_testmod_test.c    |  2 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c   | 74 ++++++++++++-------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.h   |  1 +
 11 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Comments

Stanislav Fomichev Aug. 10, 2023, 6:09 p.m. UTC | #1
On 08/10, Rong Tao wrote:
> From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
> 
> Static ksyms often have problems because the number of symbols exceeds the
> MAX_SYMS limit. Like changing the MAX_SYMS from 300000 to 400000 in
> commit e76a014334a6("selftests/bpf: Bump and validate MAX_SYMS") solves
> the problem somewhat, but it's not the perfect way.
> 
> This commit uses dynamic memory allocation, which completely solves the
> problem caused by the limitation of the number of kallsyms.

Thank you for doing this! I do remember complaining about it on the last
"let's bump the limit" patch :-D

> Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
> ---
>  samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c                |  1 +
>  samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c                   |  1 +
>  samples/bpf/spintest_user.c                   |  1 +
>  samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c              |  1 +
>  samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c                |  1 +
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c     |  1 +
>  .../bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c         |  1 +
>  .../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c        |  2 +
>  .../prog_tests/kprobe_multi_testmod_test.c    |  2 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c   | 74 ++++++++++++-------
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.h   |  1 +
>  11 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c b/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c
> index b6eedcb98fb9..5e6934f2d932 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c
> @@ -149,5 +149,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		bpf_link__destroy(links[i]);
>  
>  	bpf_object__close(obj);
> +	free_kallsyms();

Do we really need to free the symbols? IOW, is it enough to load them
once and keep them around until test_progs dies?

If we do, I wonder what would happen when test_progs runs in parallel mode?
Feels like if we're adding this alloc/free, then load_symbols
should return some object which free_kallsyms should free?
And ksym_get_addr would also work on that object, not on the global
state..


>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c b/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
> index 9283f47844fb..548ca1e9fcac 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
> @@ -230,5 +230,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  
>  	free(links);
>  	bpf_object__close(obj);
> +	free_kallsyms();
>  	return error;
>  }
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c b/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c
> index aadac14f748a..895a64afaf78 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c
> @@ -88,5 +88,6 @@ int main(int ac, char **argv)
>  		bpf_link__destroy(links[j]);
>  
>  	bpf_object__close(obj);
> +	free_kallsyms();
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
> index 1e61f2180470..3eb9477541fb 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
> @@ -419,5 +419,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		bpf_link__destroy(links[i]);
>  
>  	bpf_object__close(obj);
> +	free_kallsyms();
>  	return err;
>  }
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c b/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
> index 9664749bf618..a8b9343126fa 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
> @@ -348,5 +348,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  
>  cleanup:
>  	bpf_object__close(obj);
> +	free_kallsyms();
>  	err_exit(error);
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
> index 26b2d1bffdfd..4786396e554b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ static void kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest(void)
>  cleanup:
>  	close(link1_fd);
>  	close(link2_fd);
> +	free_kallsyms();
>  	kprobe_multi__destroy(skel);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c
> index 858e0575f502..4e1c564746e1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c
> @@ -146,4 +146,5 @@ void test_get_stack_raw_tp(void)
>  	bpf_link__destroy(link);
>  	perf_buffer__free(pb);
>  	bpf_object__close(obj);
> +	free_kallsyms();
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> index 2173c4bb555e..d6c0b5f2f887 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> @@ -488,4 +488,6 @@ void test_kprobe_multi_test(void)
>  		test_attach_api_syms();
>  	if (test__start_subtest("attach_api_fails"))
>  		test_attach_api_fails();
> +
> +	free_kallsyms();
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_testmod_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_testmod_test.c
> index 1fbe7e4ac00a..c25f262832b7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_testmod_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_testmod_test.c
> @@ -86,4 +86,6 @@ void serial_test_kprobe_multi_testmod_test(void)
>  		test_testmod_attach_api_syms();
>  	if (test__start_subtest("testmod_attach_api_addrs"))
>  		test_testmod_attach_api_addrs();
> +
> +	free_kallsyms();
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
> index f83d9f65c65b..08986f70836b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
> @@ -18,9 +18,32 @@
>  #define TRACEFS_PIPE	"/sys/kernel/tracing/trace_pipe"
>  #define DEBUGFS_PIPE	"/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe"
>  
> -#define MAX_SYMS 400000
> -static struct ksym syms[MAX_SYMS];
> -static int sym_cnt;
> +static struct {
> +	struct ksym *syms;
> +	unsigned int sym_cnt;
> +} ksyms = {
> +	.syms = NULL,
> +	.sym_cnt = 0,
> +};
> +
> +static int ksyms__add_symbol(const char *name, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	void *tmp;
> +	unsigned int cnt = ksyms.sym_cnt;
> +
> +	cnt++;
> +	tmp = realloc(ksyms.syms, sizeof(struct ksym) * cnt);
> +	if (!tmp)
> +		return -ENOMEM;

Should we do the usual len/capacity scheme here to amortize the cost
of realloc (like doubling capacity when we reach it)?
Calling realloc on every symbol doesn't seem right.
Rong Tao Aug. 11, 2023, 12:01 a.m. UTC | #2
Thanks for your advise, you are right, i just submit v2 [0].

I just found that, because of the modified patch, your email address was not
obtained through scripts/get_maintainer.pl, so the v2 [0] email was not sent
to you, sorry.

Rong Tao,
Good day.

[0] v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/tencent_B655EE5E5D463110D70CD2846AB3262EED09@qq.com/
Stanislav Fomichev Aug. 11, 2023, 4:59 p.m. UTC | #3
On 08/11, Rong Tao wrote:
> Thanks for your advise, you are right, i just submit v2 [0].
> 
> I just found that, because of the modified patch, your email address was not
> obtained through scripts/get_maintainer.pl, so the v2 [0] email was not sent
> to you, sorry.

No worries, as long as it reaches the list I'll get to it :-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c b/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c
index b6eedcb98fb9..5e6934f2d932 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/offwaketime_user.c
@@ -149,5 +149,6 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		bpf_link__destroy(links[i]);
 
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
+	free_kallsyms();
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c b/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
index 9283f47844fb..548ca1e9fcac 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
@@ -230,5 +230,6 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	free(links);
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
+	free_kallsyms();
 	return error;
 }
diff --git a/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c b/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c
index aadac14f748a..895a64afaf78 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/spintest_user.c
@@ -88,5 +88,6 @@  int main(int ac, char **argv)
 		bpf_link__destroy(links[j]);
 
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
+	free_kallsyms();
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
index 1e61f2180470..3eb9477541fb 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c
@@ -419,5 +419,6 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		bpf_link__destroy(links[i]);
 
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
+	free_kallsyms();
 	return err;
 }
diff --git a/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c b/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
index 9664749bf618..a8b9343126fa 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
@@ -348,5 +348,6 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 cleanup:
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
+	free_kallsyms();
 	err_exit(error);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
index 26b2d1bffdfd..4786396e554b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
@@ -170,6 +170,7 @@  static void kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest(void)
 cleanup:
 	close(link1_fd);
 	close(link2_fd);
+	free_kallsyms();
 	kprobe_multi__destroy(skel);
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c
index 858e0575f502..4e1c564746e1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c
@@ -146,4 +146,5 @@  void test_get_stack_raw_tp(void)
 	bpf_link__destroy(link);
 	perf_buffer__free(pb);
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
+	free_kallsyms();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
index 2173c4bb555e..d6c0b5f2f887 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -488,4 +488,6 @@  void test_kprobe_multi_test(void)
 		test_attach_api_syms();
 	if (test__start_subtest("attach_api_fails"))
 		test_attach_api_fails();
+
+	free_kallsyms();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_testmod_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_testmod_test.c
index 1fbe7e4ac00a..c25f262832b7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_testmod_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_testmod_test.c
@@ -86,4 +86,6 @@  void serial_test_kprobe_multi_testmod_test(void)
 		test_testmod_attach_api_syms();
 	if (test__start_subtest("testmod_attach_api_addrs"))
 		test_testmod_attach_api_addrs();
+
+	free_kallsyms();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
index f83d9f65c65b..08986f70836b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
@@ -18,9 +18,32 @@ 
 #define TRACEFS_PIPE	"/sys/kernel/tracing/trace_pipe"
 #define DEBUGFS_PIPE	"/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe"
 
-#define MAX_SYMS 400000
-static struct ksym syms[MAX_SYMS];
-static int sym_cnt;
+static struct {
+	struct ksym *syms;
+	unsigned int sym_cnt;
+} ksyms = {
+	.syms = NULL,
+	.sym_cnt = 0,
+};
+
+static int ksyms__add_symbol(const char *name, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	void *tmp;
+	unsigned int cnt = ksyms.sym_cnt;
+
+	cnt++;
+	tmp = realloc(ksyms.syms, sizeof(struct ksym) * cnt);
+	if (!tmp)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ksyms.sym_cnt = cnt;
+	ksyms.syms = tmp;
+
+	ksyms.syms[ksyms.sym_cnt - 1].addr = addr;
+	ksyms.syms[ksyms.sym_cnt - 1].name = strdup(name);
+
+	return 0;
+}
 
 static int ksym_cmp(const void *p1, const void *p2)
 {
@@ -33,9 +56,6 @@  int load_kallsyms_refresh(void)
 	char func[256], buf[256];
 	char symbol;
 	void *addr;
-	int i = 0;
-
-	sym_cnt = 0;
 
 	f = fopen("/proc/kallsyms", "r");
 	if (!f)
@@ -46,16 +66,10 @@  int load_kallsyms_refresh(void)
 			break;
 		if (!addr)
 			continue;
-		if (i >= MAX_SYMS)
-			return -EFBIG;
-
-		syms[i].addr = (long) addr;
-		syms[i].name = strdup(func);
-		i++;
+		ksyms__add_symbol(func, (unsigned long)addr);
 	}
 	fclose(f);
-	sym_cnt = i;
-	qsort(syms, sym_cnt, sizeof(struct ksym), ksym_cmp);
+	qsort(ksyms.syms, ksyms.sym_cnt, sizeof(struct ksym), ksym_cmp);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -65,48 +79,56 @@  int load_kallsyms(void)
 	 * This is called/used from multiplace places,
 	 * load symbols just once.
 	 */
-	if (sym_cnt)
+	if (ksyms.sym_cnt)
 		return 0;
 	return load_kallsyms_refresh();
 }
 
+void free_kallsyms(void)
+{
+	if (!ksyms.sym_cnt)
+		return;
+	free(ksyms.syms);
+	ksyms.sym_cnt = 0;
+}
+
 struct ksym *ksym_search(long key)
 {
-	int start = 0, end = sym_cnt;
+	int start = 0, end = ksyms.sym_cnt;
 	int result;
 
 	/* kallsyms not loaded. return NULL */
-	if (sym_cnt <= 0)
+	if (ksyms.sym_cnt <= 0)
 		return NULL;
 
 	while (start < end) {
 		size_t mid = start + (end - start) / 2;
 
-		result = key - syms[mid].addr;
+		result = key - ksyms.syms[mid].addr;
 		if (result < 0)
 			end = mid;
 		else if (result > 0)
 			start = mid + 1;
 		else
-			return &syms[mid];
+			return &ksyms.syms[mid];
 	}
 
-	if (start >= 1 && syms[start - 1].addr < key &&
-	    key < syms[start].addr)
+	if (start >= 1 && ksyms.syms[start - 1].addr < key &&
+	    key < ksyms.syms[start].addr)
 		/* valid ksym */
-		return &syms[start - 1];
+		return &ksyms.syms[start - 1];
 
 	/* out of range. return _stext */
-	return &syms[0];
+	return &ksyms.syms[0];
 }
 
 long ksym_get_addr(const char *name)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < sym_cnt; i++) {
-		if (strcmp(syms[i].name, name) == 0)
-			return syms[i].addr;
+	for (i = 0; i < ksyms.sym_cnt; i++) {
+		if (strcmp(ksyms.syms[i].name, name) == 0)
+			return ksyms.syms[i].addr;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.h
index 876f3e711df6..d0d2bc4066c3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@  struct ksym {
 
 int load_kallsyms(void);
 int load_kallsyms_refresh(void);
+void free_kallsyms(void);
 
 struct ksym *ksym_search(long key);
 long ksym_get_addr(const char *name);