Message ID | 20230811231610.2025814-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix UAF in hci_disconnect_all_sync | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
tedd_an/pre-ci_am | success | Success |
tedd_an/CheckPatch | success | CheckPatch PASS |
tedd_an/GitLint | success | Gitlint PASS |
tedd_an/SubjectPrefix | success | Gitlint PASS |
tedd_an/BuildKernel | success | BuildKernel PASS |
tedd_an/CheckAllWarning | success | CheckAllWarning PASS |
tedd_an/CheckSparse | success | CheckSparse PASS |
tedd_an/CheckSmatch | success | CheckSparse PASS |
tedd_an/BuildKernel32 | success | BuildKernel32 PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunnerSetup | success | TestRunnerSetup PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_l2cap-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_iso-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_bnep-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_mgmt-tester | fail | TestRunner_mgmt-tester: Total: 497, Passed: 495 (99.6%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0 |
tedd_an/TestRunner_rfcomm-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_sco-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_ioctl-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_mesh-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_smp-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/TestRunner_userchan-tester | success | TestRunner PASS |
tedd_an/IncrementalBuild | success | Incremental Build PASS |
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=775536 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PASS 0.77 seconds GitLint PASS 0.32 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.11 seconds BuildKernel PASS 38.70 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 42.94 seconds CheckSparse PASS 49.10 seconds CheckSmatch PASS 132.56 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 37.95 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 580.39 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 33.28 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 65.22 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 13.54 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester FAIL 263.32 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 20.26 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 22.74 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 22.66 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 16.88 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 18.08 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 14.55 seconds IncrementalBuild PASS 35.85 seconds Details ############################## Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner Output: Total: 497, Passed: 495 (99.6%), Failed: 2, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases LL Privacy - Unpair 1 Timed out 1.888 seconds LL Privacy - Unpair 2 (Remove from AL) Timed out 4.983 seconds --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth
Hi Luiz, pe, 2023-08-11 kello 16:16 -0700, Luiz Augusto von Dentz kirjoitti: > From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> > > Use-after-free can occur in hci_disconnect_all_sync if a connection is > deleted by concurrent processing of a controller event. > > To prevent this the code now tries to iterate over the list backwards > to ensure the links are cleanup before its parents, also it no longer > relies on a cursor, instead it always uses the last element since > hci_abort_conn_sync is guaranteed to call hci_conn_del. > > UAF crash log: > ================================================================== > BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hci_set_powered_sync > (net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c:5424) [bluetooth] > Read of size 8 at addr ffff888009d9c000 by task kworker/u9:0/124 > > CPU: 0 PID: 124 Comm: kworker/u9:0 Tainted: G W > 6.5.0-rc1+ #10 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS > 1.16.2-1.fc38 04/01/2014 > Workqueue: hci0 hci_cmd_sync_work [bluetooth] > Call Trace: > <TASK> > dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x90 > print_report+0xcf/0x670 > ? __virt_addr_valid+0xdd/0x160 > ? hci_set_powered_sync+0x2c9/0x4a0 [bluetooth] > kasan_report+0xa6/0xe0 > ? hci_set_powered_sync+0x2c9/0x4a0 [bluetooth] > ? __pfx_set_powered_sync+0x10/0x10 [bluetooth] > hci_set_powered_sync+0x2c9/0x4a0 [bluetooth] > ? __pfx_hci_set_powered_sync+0x10/0x10 [bluetooth] > ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 > ? __pfx_set_powered_sync+0x10/0x10 [bluetooth] > hci_cmd_sync_work+0x137/0x220 [bluetooth] > process_one_work+0x526/0x9d0 > ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10 > ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 > ? mark_held_locks+0x1a/0x90 > worker_thread+0x92/0x630 > ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 > kthread+0x196/0x1e0 > ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 > </TASK> > > Allocated by task 1782: > kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 > kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 > __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0 > hci_conn_add+0xa5/0xa80 [bluetooth] > hci_bind_cis+0x881/0x9b0 [bluetooth] > iso_connect_cis+0x121/0x520 [bluetooth] > iso_sock_connect+0x3f6/0x790 [bluetooth] > __sys_connect+0x109/0x130 > __x64_sys_connect+0x40/0x50 > do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 > > Freed by task 695: > kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 > kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 > kasan_save_free_info+0x2b/0x50 > __kasan_slab_free+0x10a/0x180 > __kmem_cache_free+0x14d/0x2e0 > device_release+0x5d/0xf0 > kobject_put+0xdf/0x270 > hci_disconn_complete_evt+0x274/0x3a0 [bluetooth] > hci_event_packet+0x579/0x7e0 [bluetooth] > hci_rx_work+0x287/0xaa0 [bluetooth] > process_one_work+0x526/0x9d0 > worker_thread+0x92/0x630 > kthread+0x196/0x1e0 > ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 > ================================================================== > > Fixes: 182ee45da083 ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Rework hci_suspend_notifier") > Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> > Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> > --- > net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c > index 5eb30ba21370..86e18e09136e 100644 > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c > @@ -5370,6 +5370,7 @@ int hci_abort_conn_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, u8 reason) > { > int err = 0; > u16 handle = conn->handle; > + struct hci_conn *c; > > switch (conn->state) { > case BT_CONNECTED: > @@ -5389,43 +5390,53 @@ int hci_abort_conn_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, u8 reason) > hci_dev_unlock(hdev); > return 0; > default: > + hci_dev_lock(hdev); > conn->state = BT_CLOSED; > + hci_disconn_cfm(conn, reason); > + hci_conn_del(conn); > + hci_dev_unlock(hdev); > return 0; > } > > + /* Check if the connection hasn't been cleanup while waiting > + * commands to complete. > + */ > + c = hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle(hdev, handle); > + if (!c || c != conn) > + return 0; > + > /* Cleanup hci_conn object if it cannot be cancelled as it > * likelly means the controller and host stack are out of sync > * or in case of LE it was still scanning so it can be cleanup > * safely. > */ > - if (err) { > - struct hci_conn *c; > - > - /* Check if the connection hasn't been cleanup while waiting > - * commands to complete. > - */ > - c = hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle(hdev, handle); > - if (!c || c != conn) > - return 0; > - > - hci_dev_lock(hdev); > - hci_conn_failed(conn, err); > - hci_dev_unlock(hdev); > - } > + hci_dev_lock(hdev); > + hci_conn_failed(conn, reason); > + hci_dev_unlock(hdev); To me it seems there is a theoretical race here: task 1 in hci_conn_abort_sync task 2 in hci_disconn_complete_evt task 1: c = hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle(conn->handle) task 2: hci_dev_lock(hdev) task 1: hci_dev_lock(hdev) /* waits here */ task 2: hci_conn_del(conn) /* conn deleted the first time */ task 2: hci_dev_unlock(hdev) task 1: hci_conn_failed(conn, err) /* conn deleted again */ Moving hci_dev_lock before hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle avoids this. Another related theoretical race seems to be in e.g. hci_acl/sco/isodata_packet which do hci_dev_lock(hdev); conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle(hdev, handle); hci_dev_unlock(hdev); if (conn) do_stuff_without_lock(conn); These tasks run in hdev->workqueue, so it seems like deletion of conn in hdev->req_workqueue like in hci_conn_abort_sync here could in theory occur while do_stuff_without_lock is still accessing conn. I guess in reality it depends on whether the two workqueues are really running the tasks on different CPU at the same time, and if one can hit narrow time windows. > > return err; > } > > static int hci_disconnect_all_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 reason) > { > - struct hci_conn *conn, *tmp; > - int err; > + struct list_head *head = &hdev->conn_hash.list; > + struct hci_conn *conn; > > - list_for_each_entry_safe(conn, tmp, &hdev->conn_hash.list, list) { > - err = hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); > - if (err) > - return err; > + rcu_read_lock(); > + while ((conn = list_first_or_null_rcu(head, struct hci_conn, list))) { > + /* Make sure the connection is not freed while unlocking */ > + conn = hci_conn_get(conn); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + /* Disregard possible errors since hci_conn_del shall have been > + * called even in case of errors had occurred since it would > + * then cause hci_conn_failed to be called which calls > + * hci_conn_del internally. > + */ > + hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); > + hci_conn_put(conn); > + rcu_read_lock(); > } > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > return 0; > }
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c index 5eb30ba21370..86e18e09136e 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c @@ -5370,6 +5370,7 @@ int hci_abort_conn_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, u8 reason) { int err = 0; u16 handle = conn->handle; + struct hci_conn *c; switch (conn->state) { case BT_CONNECTED: @@ -5389,43 +5390,53 @@ int hci_abort_conn_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct hci_conn *conn, u8 reason) hci_dev_unlock(hdev); return 0; default: + hci_dev_lock(hdev); conn->state = BT_CLOSED; + hci_disconn_cfm(conn, reason); + hci_conn_del(conn); + hci_dev_unlock(hdev); return 0; } + /* Check if the connection hasn't been cleanup while waiting + * commands to complete. + */ + c = hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle(hdev, handle); + if (!c || c != conn) + return 0; + /* Cleanup hci_conn object if it cannot be cancelled as it * likelly means the controller and host stack are out of sync * or in case of LE it was still scanning so it can be cleanup * safely. */ - if (err) { - struct hci_conn *c; - - /* Check if the connection hasn't been cleanup while waiting - * commands to complete. - */ - c = hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle(hdev, handle); - if (!c || c != conn) - return 0; - - hci_dev_lock(hdev); - hci_conn_failed(conn, err); - hci_dev_unlock(hdev); - } + hci_dev_lock(hdev); + hci_conn_failed(conn, reason); + hci_dev_unlock(hdev); return err; } static int hci_disconnect_all_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 reason) { - struct hci_conn *conn, *tmp; - int err; + struct list_head *head = &hdev->conn_hash.list; + struct hci_conn *conn; - list_for_each_entry_safe(conn, tmp, &hdev->conn_hash.list, list) { - err = hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); - if (err) - return err; + rcu_read_lock(); + while ((conn = list_first_or_null_rcu(head, struct hci_conn, list))) { + /* Make sure the connection is not freed while unlocking */ + conn = hci_conn_get(conn); + rcu_read_unlock(); + /* Disregard possible errors since hci_conn_del shall have been + * called even in case of errors had occurred since it would + * then cause hci_conn_failed to be called which calls + * hci_conn_del internally. + */ + hci_abort_conn_sync(hdev, conn, reason); + hci_conn_put(conn); + rcu_read_lock(); } + rcu_read_unlock(); return 0; }