Message ID | 20230815184333.6554-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | s390/vfio_ap: crypto pass-through for SE guests | expand |
On 8/15/23 20:43, Tony Krowiak wrote: > This patch series is for the changes required in the vfio_ap device > driver to facilitate pass-through of crypto devices to a secure > execution guest. In particular, it is critical that no data from the > queues passed through to the SE guest is leaked when the guest is > destroyed. There are also some new response codes returned from the > PQAP(ZAPQ) and PQAP(TAPQ) commands that have been added to the > architecture in support of pass-through of crypto devices to SE guests; > these need to be accounted for when handling the reset of queues. > @Heiko: Once this has soaked a day or two, could you please apply this and create a feature branch that I can pull from?
On 8/16/23 13:39, Janosch Frank wrote: > On 8/15/23 20:43, Tony Krowiak wrote: >> This patch series is for the changes required in the vfio_ap device >> driver to facilitate pass-through of crypto devices to a secure >> execution guest. In particular, it is critical that no data from the >> queues passed through to the SE guest is leaked when the guest is >> destroyed. There are also some new response codes returned from the >> PQAP(ZAPQ) and PQAP(TAPQ) commands that have been added to the >> architecture in support of pass-through of crypto devices to SE guests; >> these need to be accounted for when handling the reset of queues. >> > > @Heiko: Once this has soaked a day or two, could you please apply this > and create a feature branch that I can pull from? Sorry for the noise, for some reason I still had Heiko's old address in the address book. I'll delete it in a second. Here we go again.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 02:12:50PM +0200, Janosch Frank wrote: > On 8/16/23 13:39, Janosch Frank wrote: > > On 8/15/23 20:43, Tony Krowiak wrote: > > > This patch series is for the changes required in the vfio_ap device > > > driver to facilitate pass-through of crypto devices to a secure > > > execution guest. In particular, it is critical that no data from the > > > queues passed through to the SE guest is leaked when the guest is > > > destroyed. There are also some new response codes returned from the > > > PQAP(ZAPQ) and PQAP(TAPQ) commands that have been added to the > > > architecture in support of pass-through of crypto devices to SE guests; > > > these need to be accounted for when handling the reset of queues. > > > > > > > @Heiko: Once this has soaked a day or two, could you please apply this > > and create a feature branch that I can pull from? > > Sorry for the noise, for some reason I still had Heiko's old address in the > address book. I'll delete it in a second. > > Here we go again. Series is now available via the vfio-ap branch, based on rc2 like your your branches within the kvms390 tree. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git vfio-ap