diff mbox series

[v3,3/9] net/socket: Break down __sys_setsockopt

Message ID 20230817145554.892543-4-leitao@debian.org (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series io_uring: Initial support for {s,g}etsockopt commands | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Guessing tree name failed - patch did not apply, async
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for veristat

Commit Message

Breno Leitao Aug. 17, 2023, 2:55 p.m. UTC
Split __sys_setsockopt() into two functions by removing the core
logic into a sub-function (do_sock_setsockopt()). This will avoid
code duplication when doing the same operation in other callers, for
instance.

do_sock_setsockopt() will be called by io_uring setsockopt() command
operation in the following patch.

Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
 include/net/sock.h |  2 ++
 net/socket.c       | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Comments

Willem de Bruijn Aug. 19, 2023, 2:35 p.m. UTC | #1
Breno Leitao wrote:
> Split __sys_setsockopt() into two functions by removing the core
> logic into a sub-function (do_sock_setsockopt()). This will avoid
> code duplication when doing the same operation in other callers, for
> instance.
> 
> do_sock_setsockopt() will be called by io_uring setsockopt() command
> operation in the following patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>

Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> ---
>  include/net/sock.h |  2 ++
>  net/socket.c       | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 2eb916d1ff64..2a0324275347 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -1853,6 +1853,8 @@ int sk_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
>  		  sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen);
>  int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op,
>  		    sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen);
> +int do_sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
> +		       int optname, sockptr_t optval, int optlen);

Somewhat surprising that optlen type differs between __sys_setsockopt
and sock_setsockopt. But agreed that this code should follow
__sys_setsockopt.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 2eb916d1ff64..2a0324275347 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1853,6 +1853,8 @@  int sk_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 		  sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen);
 int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op,
 		    sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen);
+int do_sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
+		       int optname, sockptr_t optval, int optlen);
 
 int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 		  sockptr_t optval, sockptr_t optlen);
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 2c3ef8862b4f..b5e4398a6b4d 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -2221,30 +2221,20 @@  static bool sock_use_custom_sol_socket(const struct socket *sock)
 	return test_bit(SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT, &sock->flags);
 }
 
-/*
- *	Set a socket option. Because we don't know the option lengths we have
- *	to pass the user mode parameter for the protocols to sort out.
- */
-int __sys_setsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, char __user *user_optval,
-		int optlen)
+int do_sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
+		       int optname, sockptr_t optval, int optlen)
 {
-	sockptr_t optval = USER_SOCKPTR(user_optval);
 	char *kernel_optval = NULL;
-	int err, fput_needed;
-	struct socket *sock;
+	int err;
 
 	if (optlen < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	sock = sockfd_lookup_light(fd, &err, &fput_needed);
-	if (!sock)
-		return err;
-
 	err = security_socket_setsockopt(sock, level, optname);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_put;
 
-	if (!in_compat_syscall())
+	if (!compat)
 		err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SETSOCKOPT(sock->sk, &level, &optname,
 						     optval, &optlen,
 						     &kernel_optval);
@@ -2266,6 +2256,27 @@  int __sys_setsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, char __user *user_optval,
 					    optlen);
 	kfree(kernel_optval);
 out_put:
+	return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_sock_setsockopt);
+
+/* Set a socket option. Because we don't know the option lengths we have
+ * to pass the user mode parameter for the protocols to sort out.
+ */
+int __sys_setsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, char __user *user_optval,
+		     int optlen)
+{
+	sockptr_t optval = USER_SOCKPTR(user_optval);
+	bool compat = in_compat_syscall();
+	int err, fput_needed;
+	struct socket *sock;
+
+	sock = sockfd_lookup_light(fd, &err, &fput_needed);
+	if (!sock)
+		return err;
+
+	err = do_sock_setsockopt(sock, compat, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+
 	fput_light(sock->file, fput_needed);
 	return err;
 }