mbox series

[blktests,v3,0/3] Introduce nvmet target setup/cleanup helpers

Message ID 20230822083812.24612-1-dwagner@suse.de (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Introduce nvmet target setup/cleanup helpers | expand

Message

Daniel Wagner Aug. 22, 2023, 8:38 a.m. UTC
Addressed Sagi's feedback and dropped the explicit --blkdev=device argument from
the _nvmet_target_setup calls, as it is the default.



original cover letter:

Introduce helpers to setup nvmet targets. This is spin off from the refactoring
patches and the allowed_host patches [1].

Sagi suggested to record all resources allocated by nvmet_target_setup and then
later clean them up in nvmet_target_cleanup. I opted to figure out in
nvmet_target_cleanup what was allocated via the newly introdcuded _get_nvmet_ports
helper. The reason being, Hannes told me offline that he would like to add ANA
tests which will add some more ports to the subsystem. I hope with this
the code is more future proof.

BTW, while looking at this I saw that the passthru code is using the awkward
return value port when calling nvmet_passthru_target_setup. It seems some
more refactoring is in order...

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/5h333eqhtw252sjw6axjewlb5bbb5ze7awekczxe3kie2lnhw6@manyer42khct/


changes

v3:
 - rebased/retested
 - use the default with _nvmet_target_setup 

v2:
 - drop local subsys variable in passthru tests
 - do not use port as handle in passthru tests
 - free port after unregistering from subsys
 - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20230818141537.22332-1-dwagner@suse.de/

v1:
 - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20230818095744.24619-1-dwagner@suse.de/

Daniel Wagner (3):
  nvme/{033,034,035,036}: use default subsysnqn variable directly
  nvme/{033,034,035,036,37}: drop port handle between passthru target
    setup and cleanup
  nvme: introduce nvmet_target_{setup/cleanup} common code

 tests/nvme/003 | 14 ++-----
 tests/nvme/004 | 21 ++---------
 tests/nvme/005 | 20 +---------
 tests/nvme/006 | 19 +---------
 tests/nvme/007 | 14 +------
 tests/nvme/008 | 21 +----------
 tests/nvme/009 | 16 +-------
 tests/nvme/010 | 21 +----------
 tests/nvme/011 | 16 +-------
 tests/nvme/012 | 21 +----------
 tests/nvme/013 | 16 +-------
 tests/nvme/014 | 21 +----------
 tests/nvme/015 | 16 +-------
 tests/nvme/018 | 16 +-------
 tests/nvme/019 | 21 +----------
 tests/nvme/020 | 16 +-------
 tests/nvme/021 | 16 +-------
 tests/nvme/022 | 16 +-------
 tests/nvme/023 | 21 +----------
 tests/nvme/024 | 16 +-------
 tests/nvme/025 | 16 +-------
 tests/nvme/026 | 16 +-------
 tests/nvme/027 | 17 ++-------
 tests/nvme/028 | 17 ++-------
 tests/nvme/029 | 21 +----------
 tests/nvme/033 | 10 ++---
 tests/nvme/034 | 10 ++---
 tests/nvme/035 | 10 ++---
 tests/nvme/036 | 12 +++---
 tests/nvme/037 |  5 +--
 tests/nvme/040 | 19 +---------
 tests/nvme/041 | 18 +--------
 tests/nvme/042 | 17 +--------
 tests/nvme/043 | 17 +--------
 tests/nvme/044 | 19 ++--------
 tests/nvme/045 | 18 ++-------
 tests/nvme/047 | 21 +----------
 tests/nvme/048 | 17 +--------
 tests/nvme/rc  | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 39 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 553 deletions(-)

Comments

Chaitanya Kulkarni Aug. 22, 2023, 5:54 p.m. UTC | #1
On 8/22/23 01:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Addressed Sagi's feedback and dropped the explicit --blkdev=device argument from
> the _nvmet_target_setup calls, as it is the default.
>
>
>
> original cover letter:
>
> Introduce helpers to setup nvmet targets. This is spin off from the refactoring
> patches and the allowed_host patches [1].
>
> Sagi suggested to record all resources allocated by nvmet_target_setup and then
> later clean them up in nvmet_target_cleanup. I opted to figure out in
> nvmet_target_cleanup what was allocated via the newly introdcuded _get_nvmet_ports
> helper. The reason being, Hannes told me offline that he would like to add ANA
> tests which will add some more ports to the subsystem. I hope with this
> the code is more future proof.
>
> BTW, while looking at this I saw that the passthru code is using the awkward
> return value port when calling nvmet_passthru_target_setup. It seems some
> more refactoring is in order...
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/5h333eqhtw252sjw6axjewlb5bbb5ze7awekczxe3kie2lnhw6@manyer42khct/
>
>
> changes
>
> v3:
>   - rebased/retested
>   - use the default with _nvmet_target_setup
>
> v2:
>   - drop local subsys variable in passthru tests
>   - do not use port as handle in passthru tests
>   - free port after unregistering from subsys
>   - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20230818141537.22332-1-dwagner@suse.de/
>
> v1:
>   - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20230818095744.24619-1-dwagner@suse.de/
>
> Daniel Wagner (3):
>    nvme/{033,034,035,036}: use default subsysnqn variable directly
>    nvme/{033,034,035,036,37}: drop port handle between passthru target
>      setup and cleanup
>    nvme: introduce nvmet_target_{setup/cleanup} common code
>
>

I really appreciate you doing this cleanup, it was long due.

Thanks a lot, for this series :-

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>

-ck