diff mbox series

[v10,3/6] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI

Message ID 20230822142644.v10.3.I7209db47ef8ec151d3de61f59005bbc59fe8f113@changeid (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs | expand

Commit Message

Doug Anderson Aug. 22, 2023, 9:26 p.m. UTC 
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

To enable NMI backtrace and KGDB's NMI cpu roundup, we need to free up
at least one dedicated IPI.

On arm64 the IPI_WAKEUP IPI is only used for the ACPI parking protocol,
which itself is only used on some very early ARMv8 systems which
couldn't implement PSCI.

Remove the IPI_WAKEUP IPI, and rely on the IPI_RESCHEDULE IPI to wake
CPUs from the parked state. This will cause a tiny amonut of redundant
work to check the thread flags, but this is miniscule in relation to the
cost of taking and handling the IPI in the first place. We can safely
handle redundant IPI_RESCHEDULE IPIs, so there should be no functional
impact as a result of this change.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
I have no idea how to test this. I just took Mark's patch and jammed
it into my series. Logicially the patch seems reasonable to me.

Changes in v10:
- ("arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI") new for v10.

 arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h              |  4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                   | 28 +++++++++--------------
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Comments

Stephen Boyd Aug. 22, 2023, 11:16 p.m. UTC | #1 
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2023-08-22 14:26:58)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> index 9b31e6d0da17..798fd76a883a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -89,9 +89,9 @@ extern void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
>  extern void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
> -extern void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
> +extern void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(int cpu);

Is int used instead of unsigned int because we want to sometimes pass a
negative value to indicate an error? Maybe it should be unsigned int.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
index 9b31e6d0da17..798fd76a883a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -89,9 +89,9 @@  extern void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
 extern void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
-extern void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
+extern void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(int cpu);
 #else
-static inline void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
+static inline void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(int cpu)
 {
 	BUILD_BUG();
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
index b1990e38aed0..e1be29e608b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@  static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
 		       &mailbox->entry_point);
 	writel_relaxed(cpu_entry->gic_cpu_id, &mailbox->cpu_id);
 
-	arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu));
+	arch_send_wakeup_ipi(cpu);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 960b98b43506..bfe60adbc453 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -72,7 +72,6 @@  enum ipi_msg_type {
 	IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP,
 	IPI_TIMER,
 	IPI_IRQ_WORK,
-	IPI_WAKEUP,
 	NR_IPI
 };
 
@@ -764,7 +763,6 @@  static const char *ipi_types[NR_IPI] __tracepoint_string = {
 	[IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP]	= "CPU stop (for crash dump) interrupts",
 	[IPI_TIMER]		= "Timer broadcast interrupts",
 	[IPI_IRQ_WORK]		= "IRQ work interrupts",
-	[IPI_WAKEUP]		= "CPU wake-up interrupts",
 };
 
 static void smp_cross_call(const struct cpumask *target, unsigned int ipinr);
@@ -797,13 +795,6 @@  void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
 	smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu), IPI_CALL_FUNC);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
-void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
-{
-	smp_cross_call(mask, IPI_WAKEUP);
-}
-#endif
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_WORK
 void arch_irq_work_raise(void)
 {
@@ -897,14 +888,6 @@  static void do_handle_IPI(int ipinr)
 		break;
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
-	case IPI_WAKEUP:
-		WARN_ONCE(!acpi_parking_protocol_valid(cpu),
-			  "CPU%u: Wake-up IPI outside the ACPI parking protocol\n",
-			  cpu);
-		break;
-#endif
-
 	default:
 		pr_crit("CPU%u: Unknown IPI message 0x%x\n", cpu, ipinr);
 		break;
@@ -979,6 +962,17 @@  void arch_smp_send_reschedule(int cpu)
 	smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu), IPI_RESCHEDULE);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
+void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(int cpu)
+{
+	/*
+	 * We use a scheduler IPI to wake the CPU as this avoids the need for a
+	 * dedicated IPI and we can safely handle spurious scheduler IPIs.
+	 */
+	arch_smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
+}
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
 void tick_broadcast(const struct cpumask *mask)
 {