diff mbox series

[net] rtnetlink: Reject negative ifindexes in RTM_NEWLINK

Message ID 20230823064348.2252280-1-idosch@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 30188bd7838c16a98a520db1fe9df01ffc6ed368
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net] rtnetlink: Reject negative ifindexes in RTM_NEWLINK | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1330 this patch: 1330
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 1 blamed authors not CCed: kaber@trash.net; 3 maintainers not CCed: kaber@trash.net edwin.peer@broadcom.com lucien.xin@gmail.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1351 this patch: 1351
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1353 this patch: 1353
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 9 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Ido Schimmel Aug. 23, 2023, 6:43 a.m. UTC
Negative ifindexes are illegal, but the kernel does not validate the
ifindex in the ancillary header of RTM_NEWLINK messages, resulting in
the kernel generating a warning [1] when such an ifindex is specified.

Fix by rejecting negative ifindexes.

[1]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5031 at net/core/dev.c:9593 dev_index_reserve+0x1a2/0x1c0 net/core/dev.c:9593
[...]
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 register_netdevice+0x69a/0x1490 net/core/dev.c:10081
 br_dev_newlink+0x27/0x110 net/bridge/br_netlink.c:1552
 rtnl_newlink_create net/core/rtnetlink.c:3471 [inline]
 __rtnl_newlink+0x115e/0x18c0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3688
 rtnl_newlink+0x67/0xa0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3701
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x439/0xd30 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6427
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x16b/0x440 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2545
 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342 [inline]
 netlink_unicast+0x536/0x810 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1368
 netlink_sendmsg+0x93c/0xe40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1910
 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:728 [inline]
 sock_sendmsg+0xd9/0x180 net/socket.c:751
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x6ac/0x940 net/socket.c:2538
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x135/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2592
 __sys_sendmsg+0x117/0x1e0 net/socket.c:2621
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Fixes: 38f7b870d4a6 ("[RTNETLINK]: Link creation API")
Reported-by: syzbot+5ba06978f34abb058571@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
---
 net/core/rtnetlink.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Comments

Jakub Kicinski Aug. 24, 2023, 2:06 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:43:48 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Negative ifindexes are illegal, but the kernel does not validate the
> ifindex in the ancillary header of RTM_NEWLINK messages, resulting in
> the kernel generating a warning [1] when such an ifindex is specified.

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Thanks!
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Aug. 24, 2023, 8 a.m. UTC | #2
Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:

On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:43:48 +0300 you wrote:
> Negative ifindexes are illegal, but the kernel does not validate the
> ifindex in the ancillary header of RTM_NEWLINK messages, resulting in
> the kernel generating a warning [1] when such an ifindex is specified.
> 
> Fix by rejecting negative ifindexes.
> 
> [1]
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5031 at net/core/dev.c:9593 dev_index_reserve+0x1a2/0x1c0 net/core/dev.c:9593
> [...]
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  register_netdevice+0x69a/0x1490 net/core/dev.c:10081
>  br_dev_newlink+0x27/0x110 net/bridge/br_netlink.c:1552
>  rtnl_newlink_create net/core/rtnetlink.c:3471 [inline]
>  __rtnl_newlink+0x115e/0x18c0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3688
>  rtnl_newlink+0x67/0xa0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3701
>  rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x439/0xd30 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6427
>  netlink_rcv_skb+0x16b/0x440 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2545
>  netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342 [inline]
>  netlink_unicast+0x536/0x810 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1368
>  netlink_sendmsg+0x93c/0xe40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1910
>  sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:728 [inline]
>  sock_sendmsg+0xd9/0x180 net/socket.c:751
>  ____sys_sendmsg+0x6ac/0x940 net/socket.c:2538
>  ___sys_sendmsg+0x135/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2592
>  __sys_sendmsg+0x117/0x1e0 net/socket.c:2621
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] rtnetlink: Reject negative ifindexes in RTM_NEWLINK
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/30188bd7838c

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index bcebdeb59163..00c94d9622b4 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -3561,6 +3561,9 @@  static int __rtnl_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 	if (ifm->ifi_index > 0) {
 		link_specified = true;
 		dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifm->ifi_index);
+	} else if (ifm->ifi_index < 0) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ifindex can't be negative");
+		return -EINVAL;
 	} else if (tb[IFLA_IFNAME] || tb[IFLA_ALT_IFNAME]) {
 		link_specified = true;
 		dev = rtnl_dev_get(net, tb);