@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ class Helper(APIElement):
Break down helper function protocol into smaller chunks: return type,
name, distincts arguments.
"""
- arg_re = re.compile('((\w+ )*?(\w+|...))( (\**)(\w+))?$')
+ arg_re = re.compile(r'((\w+ )*?(\w+|...))( (\**)(\w+))?$')
res = {}
- proto_re = re.compile('(.+) (\**)(\w+)\(((([^,]+)(, )?){1,5})\)$')
+ proto_re = re.compile(r'(.+) (\**)(\w+)\(((([^,]+)(, )?){1,5})\)$')
capture = proto_re.match(self.proto)
res['ret_type'] = capture.group(1)
@@ -114,11 +114,11 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
return Helper(proto=proto, desc=desc, ret=ret)
def parse_symbol(self):
- p = re.compile(' \* ?(BPF\w+)$')
+ p = re.compile(r' \* ?(BPF\w+)$')
capture = p.match(self.line)
if not capture:
raise NoSyscallCommandFound
- end_re = re.compile(' \* ?NOTES$')
+ end_re = re.compile(r' \* ?NOTES$')
end = end_re.match(self.line)
if end:
raise NoSyscallCommandFound
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
# - Same as above, with "const" and/or "struct" in front of type
# - "..." (undefined number of arguments, for bpf_trace_printk())
# There is at least one term ("void"), and at most five arguments.
- p = re.compile(' \* ?((.+) \**\w+\((((const )?(struct )?(\w+|\.\.\.)( \**\w+)?)(, )?){1,5}\))$')
+ p = re.compile(r' \* ?((.+) \**\w+\((((const )?(struct )?(\w+|\.\.\.)( \**\w+)?)(, )?){1,5}\))$')
capture = p.match(self.line)
if not capture:
raise NoHelperFound
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
return capture.group(1)
def parse_desc(self, proto):
- p = re.compile(' \* ?(?:\t| {5,8})Description$')
+ p = re.compile(r' \* ?(?:\t| {5,8})Description$')
capture = p.match(self.line)
if not capture:
raise Exception("No description section found for " + proto)
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
if self.line == ' *\n':
desc += '\n'
else:
- p = re.compile(' \* ?(?:\t| {5,8})(?:\t| {8})(.*)')
+ p = re.compile(r' \* ?(?:\t| {5,8})(?:\t| {8})(.*)')
capture = p.match(self.line)
if capture:
desc_present = True
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
return desc
def parse_ret(self, proto):
- p = re.compile(' \* ?(?:\t| {5,8})Return$')
+ p = re.compile(r' \* ?(?:\t| {5,8})Return$')
capture = p.match(self.line)
if not capture:
raise Exception("No return section found for " + proto)
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
if self.line == ' *\n':
ret += '\n'
else:
- p = re.compile(' \* ?(?:\t| {5,8})(?:\t| {8})(.*)')
+ p = re.compile(r' \* ?(?:\t| {5,8})(?:\t| {8})(.*)')
capture = p.match(self.line)
if capture:
ret_present = True
@@ -219,12 +219,12 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
self.seek_to('enum bpf_cmd {',
'Could not find start of bpf_cmd enum', 0)
# Searches for either one or more BPF\w+ enums
- bpf_p = re.compile('\s*(BPF\w+)+')
+ bpf_p = re.compile(r'\s*(BPF\w+)+')
# Searches for an enum entry assigned to another entry,
# for e.g. BPF_PROG_RUN = BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN, which is
# not documented hence should be skipped in check to
# determine if the right number of syscalls are documented
- assign_p = re.compile('\s*(BPF\w+)\s*=\s*(BPF\w+)')
+ assign_p = re.compile(r'\s*(BPF\w+)\s*=\s*(BPF\w+)')
bpf_cmd_str = ''
while True:
capture = assign_p.match(self.line)
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
break
self.line = self.reader.readline()
# Find the number of occurences of BPF\w+
- self.enum_syscalls = re.findall('(BPF\w+)+', bpf_cmd_str)
+ self.enum_syscalls = re.findall(r'(BPF\w+)+', bpf_cmd_str)
def parse_desc_helpers(self):
self.seek_to(helpersDocStart,
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
self.seek_to('#define ___BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN, ctx...)',
'Could not find start of eBPF helper definition list')
# Searches for one FN(\w+) define or a backslash for newline
- p = re.compile('\s*FN\((\w+), (\d+), ##ctx\)|\\\\')
+ p = re.compile(r'\s*FN\((\w+), (\d+), ##ctx\)|\\\\')
fn_defines_str = ''
i = 0
while True:
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
break
self.line = self.reader.readline()
# Find the number of occurences of FN(\w+)
- self.define_unique_helpers = re.findall('FN\(\w+, \d+, ##ctx\)', fn_defines_str)
+ self.define_unique_helpers = re.findall(r'FN\(\w+, \d+, ##ctx\)', fn_defines_str)
def validate_helpers(self):
last_helper = ''
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ class PrinterRST(Printer):
try:
cmd = ['git', 'log', '-1', '--pretty=format:%cs', '--no-patch',
'-L',
- '/{}/,/\*\//:include/uapi/linux/bpf.h'.format(delimiter)]
+ '/{}/,/\\*\\//:include/uapi/linux/bpf.h'.format(delimiter)]
date = subprocess.run(cmd, cwd=linuxRoot,
capture_output=True, check=True)
return date.stdout.decode().rstrip()
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ as "Dual BSD/GPL", may be used). Some helper functions are only accessible to
programs that are compatible with the GNU Privacy License (GPL).
In order to use such helpers, the eBPF program must be loaded with the correct
-license string passed (via **attr**) to the **bpf**\ () system call, and this
+license string passed (via **attr**) to the **bpf**\\ () system call, and this
generally translates into the C source code of the program containing a line
similar to the following:
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ may be interested in:
* The bpftool utility can be used to probe the availability of helper functions
on the system (as well as supported program and map types, and a number of
other parameters). To do so, run **bpftool feature probe** (see
- **bpftool-feature**\ (8) for details). Add the **unprivileged** keyword to
+ **bpftool-feature**\\ (8) for details). Add the **unprivileged** keyword to
list features available to unprivileged users.
Compatibility between helper functions and program types can generally be found
@@ -562,23 +562,23 @@ other functions, themselves allowing access to additional helpers. The
requirement for GPL license is also in those **struct bpf_func_proto**.
Compatibility between helper functions and map types can be found in the
-**check_map_func_compatibility**\ () function in file *kernel/bpf/verifier.c*.
+**check_map_func_compatibility**\\ () function in file *kernel/bpf/verifier.c*.
Helper functions that invalidate the checks on **data** and **data_end**
pointers for network processing are listed in function
-**bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data**\ () in file *net/core/filter.c*.
+**bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data**\\ () in file *net/core/filter.c*.
SEE ALSO
========
-**bpf**\ (2),
-**bpftool**\ (8),
-**cgroups**\ (7),
-**ip**\ (8),
-**perf_event_open**\ (2),
-**sendmsg**\ (2),
-**socket**\ (7),
-**tc-bpf**\ (8)'''
+**bpf**\\ (2),
+**bpftool**\\ (8),
+**cgroups**\\ (7),
+**ip**\\ (8),
+**perf_event_open**\\ (2),
+**sendmsg**\\ (2),
+**socket**\\ (7),
+**tc-bpf**\\ (8)'''
print(footer)
def print_proto(self, helper):
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ SEE ALSO
one_arg = '{}{}'.format(comma, a['type'])
if a['name']:
if a['star']:
- one_arg += ' {}**\ '.format(a['star'].replace('*', '\\*'))
+ one_arg += ' {}**\\ '.format(a['star'].replace('*', '\\*'))
else:
one_arg += '** '
one_arg += '*{}*\\ **'.format(a['name'])
The script bpf_doc.py generates multiple SyntaxWarnings related to invalid escape sequences when executed with Python 3.12. These warnings do not appear in Python 3.10 and 3.11 and do not affect the kernel build, which completes successfully. This patch resolves these SyntaxWarnings by converting the relevant string literals to raw strings or by escaping backslashes. This ensures that backslashes are interpreted as literal characters, eliminating the warnings. Signed-off-by: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@linux.ibm.com> Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- scripts/bpf_doc.py | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)