diff mbox series

[09/37] clk: renesas: rzg2l: fix computation formula

Message ID 20230912045157.177966-10-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Geert Uytterhoeven
Headers show
Series Add new Renesas RZ/G3S SoC and RZ/G3S SMARC EVK | expand

Commit Message

Claudiu Sept. 12, 2023, 4:51 a.m. UTC
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>

According to hardware manual of RZ/G2L (r01uh0914ej0130-rzg2l-rzg2lc.pdf)
the computation formula for PLL rate is as follows:

Fout = ((m + k/65536) * Fin) / (p * 2^s)

and k has values in range [-32768, 32767]. Dividing k by 65536 with
integer variables leads all the time to zero. Thus we may have slight
differences b/w what has been set vs. what is displayed. Thus,
get rid of this and decompose the formula before dividing k by 65536.

Fixes: ef3c613ccd68a ("clk: renesas: Add CPG core wrapper for RZ/G2L SoC")
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
---
 drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Geert Uytterhoeven Sept. 14, 2023, 12:55 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Claudiu,

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:52 AM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>
> According to hardware manual of RZ/G2L (r01uh0914ej0130-rzg2l-rzg2lc.pdf)
> the computation formula for PLL rate is as follows:
>
> Fout = ((m + k/65536) * Fin) / (p * 2^s)
>
> and k has values in range [-32768, 32767]. Dividing k by 65536 with
> integer variables leads all the time to zero. Thus we may have slight
> differences b/w what has been set vs. what is displayed. Thus,
> get rid of this and decompose the formula before dividing k by 65536.
>
> Fixes: ef3c613ccd68a ("clk: renesas: Add CPG core wrapper for RZ/G2L SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> @@ -696,18 +696,22 @@ static unsigned long rzg2l_cpg_pll_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>         struct pll_clk *pll_clk = to_pll(hw);
>         struct rzg2l_cpg_priv *priv = pll_clk->priv;
>         unsigned int val1, val2;
> -       unsigned int mult = 1;
> -       unsigned int div = 1;
> +       unsigned int div;
> +       u64 rate;
> +       s16 kdiv;
>
>         if (pll_clk->type != CLK_TYPE_SAM_PLL)
>                 return parent_rate;
>
>         val1 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK1(pll_clk->conf));
>         val2 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK2(pll_clk->conf));
> -       mult = MDIV(val1) + KDIV(val1) / 65536;
> +       kdiv = KDIV(val1);
>         div = PDIV(val1) << SDIV(val2);
>
> -       return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * mult, div);
> +       rate = (u64)MDIV(val1) * parent_rate;
> +       rate += ((long long)parent_rate * kdiv) / 65536;

As the division is a binary shift, you can use the mul_u64_u32_shr() helper,
and incorporate the sdiv shift at the same time:

    rate += mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, KDIV(val1), 16 + SDIV(val2));

You can save a multiplication by premultiplying mdiv by 65536:

    rate = mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, (MDIV(val1) << 16)) + KDIV(val1),
                           16 + SDIV(val2));

> +
> +       return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, div);

return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, PDIV(val1));

>  }
>
>  static const struct clk_ops rzg2l_cpg_pll_ops = {

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Claudiu Sept. 26, 2023, 11:47 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi, Geert,

On 14.09.2023 15:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Claudiu,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:52 AM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:
>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>>
>> According to hardware manual of RZ/G2L (r01uh0914ej0130-rzg2l-rzg2lc.pdf)
>> the computation formula for PLL rate is as follows:
>>
>> Fout = ((m + k/65536) * Fin) / (p * 2^s)
>>
>> and k has values in range [-32768, 32767]. Dividing k by 65536 with
>> integer variables leads all the time to zero. Thus we may have slight
>> differences b/w what has been set vs. what is displayed. Thus,
>> get rid of this and decompose the formula before dividing k by 65536.
>>
>> Fixes: ef3c613ccd68a ("clk: renesas: Add CPG core wrapper for RZ/G2L SoC")
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
>> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
>> @@ -696,18 +696,22 @@ static unsigned long rzg2l_cpg_pll_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>>         struct pll_clk *pll_clk = to_pll(hw);
>>         struct rzg2l_cpg_priv *priv = pll_clk->priv;
>>         unsigned int val1, val2;
>> -       unsigned int mult = 1;
>> -       unsigned int div = 1;
>> +       unsigned int div;
>> +       u64 rate;
>> +       s16 kdiv;
>>
>>         if (pll_clk->type != CLK_TYPE_SAM_PLL)
>>                 return parent_rate;
>>
>>         val1 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK1(pll_clk->conf));
>>         val2 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK2(pll_clk->conf));
>> -       mult = MDIV(val1) + KDIV(val1) / 65536;
>> +       kdiv = KDIV(val1);
>>         div = PDIV(val1) << SDIV(val2);
>>
>> -       return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * mult, div);
>> +       rate = (u64)MDIV(val1) * parent_rate;
>> +       rate += ((long long)parent_rate * kdiv) / 65536;
> 
> As the division is a binary shift, you can use the mul_u64_u32_shr() helper,
> and incorporate the sdiv shift at the same time:
> 
>     rate += mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, KDIV(val1), 16 + SDIV(val2));
> 
> You can save a multiplication by premultiplying mdiv by 65536:
> 
>     rate = mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, (MDIV(val1) << 16)) + KDIV(val1),
>                            16 + SDIV(val2));

Looking again at this: KDIV (aka DIV_K) could have negative values thus
mul_u64_u32_shr() cannot be used here.

> 
>> +
>> +       return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, div);
> 
> return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, PDIV(val1));
> 
>>  }
>>
>>  static const struct clk_ops rzg2l_cpg_pll_ops = {
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
>
Geert Uytterhoeven Sept. 26, 2023, 2:44 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Claudiu,

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 1:47 PM claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:
> On 14.09.2023 15:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:52 AM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:
> >> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
> >>
> >> According to hardware manual of RZ/G2L (r01uh0914ej0130-rzg2l-rzg2lc.pdf)
> >> the computation formula for PLL rate is as follows:
> >>
> >> Fout = ((m + k/65536) * Fin) / (p * 2^s)
> >>
> >> and k has values in range [-32768, 32767]. Dividing k by 65536 with
> >> integer variables leads all the time to zero. Thus we may have slight
> >> differences b/w what has been set vs. what is displayed. Thus,
> >> get rid of this and decompose the formula before dividing k by 65536.
> >>
> >> Fixes: ef3c613ccd68a ("clk: renesas: Add CPG core wrapper for RZ/G2L SoC")
> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> >> @@ -696,18 +696,22 @@ static unsigned long rzg2l_cpg_pll_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> >>         struct pll_clk *pll_clk = to_pll(hw);
> >>         struct rzg2l_cpg_priv *priv = pll_clk->priv;
> >>         unsigned int val1, val2;
> >> -       unsigned int mult = 1;
> >> -       unsigned int div = 1;
> >> +       unsigned int div;
> >> +       u64 rate;
> >> +       s16 kdiv;
> >>
> >>         if (pll_clk->type != CLK_TYPE_SAM_PLL)
> >>                 return parent_rate;
> >>
> >>         val1 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK1(pll_clk->conf));
> >>         val2 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK2(pll_clk->conf));
> >> -       mult = MDIV(val1) + KDIV(val1) / 65536;
> >> +       kdiv = KDIV(val1);
> >>         div = PDIV(val1) << SDIV(val2);
> >>
> >> -       return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * mult, div);
> >> +       rate = (u64)MDIV(val1) * parent_rate;
> >> +       rate += ((long long)parent_rate * kdiv) / 65536;
> >
> > As the division is a binary shift, you can use the mul_u64_u32_shr() helper,
> > and incorporate the sdiv shift at the same time:
> >
> >     rate += mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, KDIV(val1), 16 + SDIV(val2));

 [1]^

> >
> > You can save a multiplication by premultiplying mdiv by 65536:
> >
> >     rate = mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, (MDIV(val1) << 16)) + KDIV(val1),
> >                            16 + SDIV(val2));

[2]^

>
> Looking again at this: KDIV (aka DIV_K) could have negative values thus
> mul_u64_u32_shr() cannot be used here.

That means you can indeed not use [1].

But you can still use [2], as MDIV() must be in the range 64..533[3],
so "(MDIV(val1) << 16)) + (s16)KDIV(val1)" is always positive.
Note that you do need the cast to s16 (which I had missed before), or
the intermediate variable kdiv of type s16 (like in your patch).

[3] As the current PLL driver is read-only, there is no calculation or
    validation of the PLL parameters.

> >> +
> >> +       return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, div);
> >
> > return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, PDIV(val1));

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Geert Uytterhoeven Sept. 27, 2023, 8 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Claudiu,

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 4:44 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 1:47 PM claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:
> > On 14.09.2023 15:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:52 AM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:
> > >> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
> > >>
> > >> According to hardware manual of RZ/G2L (r01uh0914ej0130-rzg2l-rzg2lc.pdf)
> > >> the computation formula for PLL rate is as follows:
> > >>
> > >> Fout = ((m + k/65536) * Fin) / (p * 2^s)
> > >>
> > >> and k has values in range [-32768, 32767]. Dividing k by 65536 with
> > >> integer variables leads all the time to zero. Thus we may have slight
> > >> differences b/w what has been set vs. what is displayed. Thus,
> > >> get rid of this and decompose the formula before dividing k by 65536.
> > >>
> > >> Fixes: ef3c613ccd68a ("clk: renesas: Add CPG core wrapper for RZ/G2L SoC")
> > >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patch!
> > >
> > >> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> > >> @@ -696,18 +696,22 @@ static unsigned long rzg2l_cpg_pll_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> > >>         struct pll_clk *pll_clk = to_pll(hw);
> > >>         struct rzg2l_cpg_priv *priv = pll_clk->priv;
> > >>         unsigned int val1, val2;
> > >> -       unsigned int mult = 1;
> > >> -       unsigned int div = 1;
> > >> +       unsigned int div;
> > >> +       u64 rate;
> > >> +       s16 kdiv;
> > >>
> > >>         if (pll_clk->type != CLK_TYPE_SAM_PLL)
> > >>                 return parent_rate;
> > >>
> > >>         val1 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK1(pll_clk->conf));
> > >>         val2 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK2(pll_clk->conf));
> > >> -       mult = MDIV(val1) + KDIV(val1) / 65536;
> > >> +       kdiv = KDIV(val1);
> > >>         div = PDIV(val1) << SDIV(val2);
> > >>
> > >> -       return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * mult, div);
> > >> +       rate = (u64)MDIV(val1) * parent_rate;
> > >> +       rate += ((long long)parent_rate * kdiv) / 65536;
> > >
> > > As the division is a binary shift, you can use the mul_u64_u32_shr() helper,
> > > and incorporate the sdiv shift at the same time:
> > >
> > >     rate += mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, KDIV(val1), 16 + SDIV(val2));
>
>  [1]^
>
> > >
> > > You can save a multiplication by premultiplying mdiv by 65536:
> > >
> > >     rate = mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, (MDIV(val1) << 16)) + KDIV(val1),
> > >                            16 + SDIV(val2));
>
> [2]^
>
> >
> > Looking again at this: KDIV (aka DIV_K) could have negative values thus
> > mul_u64_u32_shr() cannot be used here.
>
> That means you can indeed not use [1].
>
> But you can still use [2], as MDIV() must be in the range 64..533[3],
> so "(MDIV(val1) << 16)) + (s16)KDIV(val1)" is always positive.
> Note that you do need the cast to s16 (which I had missed before), or
> the intermediate variable kdiv of type s16 (like in your patch).

Or include the cast to a signed type in the definition of KDIV().

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Claudiu Sept. 28, 2023, 4:55 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi, Geert,

On 27.09.2023 11:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Claudiu,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 4:44 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 1:47 PM claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:
>>> On 14.09.2023 15:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:52 AM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:
>>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> According to hardware manual of RZ/G2L (r01uh0914ej0130-rzg2l-rzg2lc.pdf)
>>>>> the computation formula for PLL rate is as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> Fout = ((m + k/65536) * Fin) / (p * 2^s)
>>>>>
>>>>> and k has values in range [-32768, 32767]. Dividing k by 65536 with
>>>>> integer variables leads all the time to zero. Thus we may have slight
>>>>> differences b/w what has been set vs. what is displayed. Thus,
>>>>> get rid of this and decompose the formula before dividing k by 65536.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: ef3c613ccd68a ("clk: renesas: Add CPG core wrapper for RZ/G2L SoC")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your patch!
>>>>
>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
>>>>> @@ -696,18 +696,22 @@ static unsigned long rzg2l_cpg_pll_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>>>>>         struct pll_clk *pll_clk = to_pll(hw);
>>>>>         struct rzg2l_cpg_priv *priv = pll_clk->priv;
>>>>>         unsigned int val1, val2;
>>>>> -       unsigned int mult = 1;
>>>>> -       unsigned int div = 1;
>>>>> +       unsigned int div;
>>>>> +       u64 rate;
>>>>> +       s16 kdiv;
>>>>>
>>>>>         if (pll_clk->type != CLK_TYPE_SAM_PLL)
>>>>>                 return parent_rate;
>>>>>
>>>>>         val1 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK1(pll_clk->conf));
>>>>>         val2 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK2(pll_clk->conf));
>>>>> -       mult = MDIV(val1) + KDIV(val1) / 65536;
>>>>> +       kdiv = KDIV(val1);
>>>>>         div = PDIV(val1) << SDIV(val2);
>>>>>
>>>>> -       return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * mult, div);
>>>>> +       rate = (u64)MDIV(val1) * parent_rate;
>>>>> +       rate += ((long long)parent_rate * kdiv) / 65536;
>>>>
>>>> As the division is a binary shift, you can use the mul_u64_u32_shr() helper,
>>>> and incorporate the sdiv shift at the same time:
>>>>
>>>>     rate += mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, KDIV(val1), 16 + SDIV(val2));
>>
>>  [1]^
>>
>>>>
>>>> You can save a multiplication by premultiplying mdiv by 65536:
>>>>
>>>>     rate = mul_u64_u32_shr(parent_rate, (MDIV(val1) << 16)) + KDIV(val1),
>>>>                            16 + SDIV(val2));
>>
>> [2]^
>>
>>>
>>> Looking again at this: KDIV (aka DIV_K) could have negative values thus
>>> mul_u64_u32_shr() cannot be used here.
>>
>> That means you can indeed not use [1].

You're right. Thanks for the input!

>>
>> But you can still use [2], as MDIV() must be in the range 64..533[3],
>> so "(MDIV(val1) << 16)) + (s16)KDIV(val1)" is always positive.
>> Note that you do need the cast to s16 (which I had missed before), or
>> the intermediate variable kdiv of type s16 (like in your patch).
> 
> Or include the cast to a signed type in the definition of KDIV().
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
index d0d086d6dc51..b391c9548421 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
@@ -696,18 +696,22 @@  static unsigned long rzg2l_cpg_pll_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	struct pll_clk *pll_clk = to_pll(hw);
 	struct rzg2l_cpg_priv *priv = pll_clk->priv;
 	unsigned int val1, val2;
-	unsigned int mult = 1;
-	unsigned int div = 1;
+	unsigned int div;
+	u64 rate;
+	s16 kdiv;
 
 	if (pll_clk->type != CLK_TYPE_SAM_PLL)
 		return parent_rate;
 
 	val1 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK1(pll_clk->conf));
 	val2 = readl(priv->base + GET_REG_SAMPLL_CLK2(pll_clk->conf));
-	mult = MDIV(val1) + KDIV(val1) / 65536;
+	kdiv = KDIV(val1);
 	div = PDIV(val1) << SDIV(val2);
 
-	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * mult, div);
+	rate = (u64)MDIV(val1) * parent_rate;
+	rate += ((long long)parent_rate * kdiv) / 65536;
+
+	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(rate, div);
 }
 
 static const struct clk_ops rzg2l_cpg_pll_ops = {